Overview

Hidden-state probing asks what information is available in a model’s internal activations, often by fitting linear probes and comparing layers, tokens, or trajectories. Researchers use it to detect properties such as hallucination, refusal, deception, prompt injection, and task state, and to inspect representations in settings including language, time series, and biology. Methods include linear and nonlinear classifiers, contrastive directions, sparse-autoencoder features, and causal interventions such as activation patching or steering; evaluations increasingly use matched controls, distribution shifts, and cross-model tests. A central unresolved issue is that decodability does not show that a model causally uses a signal, and strong probe scores can reflect confounds or fail to transfer to new contexts.

Latest papers

CardsList

49 papers11 papers in the last four weeks, up 175% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

  1. Why Static Probes Fail: Context Determines Deception Feature Composition

    Oct 20, 2026Yao Huang, Siyuan Chen, Zhenghan Zhou +1Deception in Language ModelsHidden-State Probing

  2. Diagnosing GNN Failure Modes with Layer-Wise Probe Entropy

    Oct 15, 2026Shanzi Bao, Mar Gonzàlez I Català, Pietro LiòGraph Neural NetworksHidden-State Probing

  3. Effectiveness of Hidden-State Probes for Localizing Reasoning Failures

    Oct 15, 2026Shubham Subhnil, Yannis Belkhiter, Erik Miehling +2Hidden-State ProbingReasoning Trace Analysis

  4. Grounding Probes: Generator-Independent Hallucination Detection from Observer Model Hidden States

    Oct 3, 2026Michael Rathmayr, Ádám Kovács, Gábor RecskiHallucination in RAGLLM Grounding

  5. Alignment via Training Against Probes Without Losing Monitorability

    Sep 29, 2026Lena Libon, Alexander Panfilov, Ben Rank +3Fine-TuningLLM Safety Alignment

  6. Finite Probes Suffice: Identifiability and Universality for Weight-Space Learning

    Sep 27, 2026Soutrik Sarangi, Yonatan Sverdlov, Adir Dayan +2Hidden-State ProbingWeight-Space Learning

  7. Decodability is Not Causality: Dissociating Probe Readouts from Behavioral Drivers via SAE Decomposition

    Sep 16, 2026Devesh Tiwari, Camille Davis, Shivank Sinha +3Causal Interventions in Language ModelsHidden-State Probing

  8. The Hallucination Signal Is a Mean Shift: Why Simple Probes Suffice

    Aug 28, 2026Jungseob Lee, Jaehyung Seo, Heuiseok LimLLM Hallucination DetectionHidden-State Probing

  9. Probing and steering biology across Boltz-1s trunk-diffusion boundary

    Aug 11, 2026Piotr Jedryszek, Tongmeng Xie, Adam Winnifrith +5Protein Structure PredictionActivation Steering

  10. Probe, Don't Prompt: A Hidden-State Probe for Metadata Filtering in Multi-Meta-RAG

    Jul 4, 2026Mykhailo Poliakov, Nadiya ShvaiRetrieval-Augmented GenerationLLM Information Extraction

  11. Aionoscope: Debugging Latent-State Accessibility in Time-Series Representations

    Jul 1, 2026Alexander Chemeris, Ming Jin, Randall BalestrieroSynthetic Benchmark GenerationTime Series Representation Learning

  12. Event-Conditioned Diagnostics of Kinematic, Contact, and Object-Permanence Fields in Passive Object-State World Models

    Jun 26, 2026Yang Liu, Yuming ChenLatent Dynamics ModelingLatent World Models

  13. When AUC 0.998 Is Not Enough: A Candidate Evaluation Protocol for Hidden-State Probes of Indirect Prompt Injection in Multimodal Computer-Use Agents

    Jun 22, 2026Yanhang Li, Zhichao Fan, Zexin ZhuangAI Agent EvaluationIndirect Prompt Injection

  14. Now You (Still) See Me: Detecting Evasive Steganographic Payloads in LLMs

    Jun 8, 2026Charles Westphal, Timothy Douglas, Keivan Navaie +2LLM Backdoor AttacksAdversarial Attacks on LLMs