HuMiT: Low-Latency Whole-Body Humanoid Teleoperation via Compact Reference Tracking
Organizations: Tsinghua IIIS · The Chinese University of Hong Kong · Renmin University of China · Tsinghua College AI ·
Abstract
Real-time whole-body humanoid teleoperation remains challenging due to the computational latency introduced by optimization-based retargeting pipelines and future-frame conditioning. Existing motion tracking policies typically require dense reference targets including full joint positions, body-part transformations, and even future frames, which tightly couples the controller to expensive upstream modules. In this work, we present HuMiT, a whole-body teleoperation system built on a unified tracking policy that requires only a compact reference target, consisting of root height, root velocity, and the SE(3) poses of four sparse keypoints at the current frame, yet achieves competitive tracking fidelity compared to methods relying on more diverse reference states including complete joint positions, dense body-part transformations, and even future frames. Experiments show that our policy achieves a communication-to-inference latency of 20 ms measured between headset streaming and policy output and a video-based optical flow latency of 65 ms (median) across different motion types. We validate the system on a Unitree G1 humanoid, showcasing split-second reactive responses such as catching a tossed ball, as well as coordinated loco-manipulation capabilities. Project page: https://xiaohu-art.github.io/Track/.
Figures & tables
| Reward Term | Error Term | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Anchor position | ||
| Anchor orientation | ||
| Body position | ||
| Body orientation | ||
| Body linear velocity | ||
| Body angular velocity |
| Method | Buffering (ms) | Online retarget. | End-to-end (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SONIC [ 4 ] | 200 | 245 | |
| SONIC-LL | 80 | 145 | |
| TWIST2 [ 13 ] | 0 | 120 | |
| HuMiT (ours) | 0 | 65 |
| AMASS | LAFAN1 | BONES-SEED | |||||||||||||
| Method | SR | SR | SR | ||||||||||||
| SONIC [ 4 ] | 316.0 | 0.116 | 0.141 | 0.312 | 79.8 | 1492.6 | 0.097 | 0.221 | 0.394 | 20.0 | 143.1 | 0.098 | 0.112 | 0.295 | 98.2 |
| SONIC-LL | 400.5 | 0.113 | 0.177 | 0.397 | 59.5 | 1524.5 | 0.110 | 0.245 | 0.537 | 15.0 | 229.9 | 0.098 | 0.136 | 0.384 | 96.5 |
| ScaleBFM-M [ 28 ] | 73.2 | 0.123 | 0.145 | 0.444 | 92.6 | 82.1 | 0.102 | 0.226 | 0.699 | 27.5 | 60.2 | 0.079 | 0.136 | 0.435 | 97.7 |
| ScaleBFM-XL [ 28 ] | 71.8 | 0.125 | 0.137 | 0.407 | 94.0 | 82.8 | 0.097 | 0.224 | 0.621 | 32.5 | 58.5 | 0.081 | 0.128 | 0.403 | 98.7 |
| ExtremControl [ 20 ] | 329.5 | 0.246 | 0.259 | 0.675 | 60.1 | 191.0 | 0.203 | 0.244 | 0.781 | 0.0 | 220.2 | 0.138 | 0.203 | 0.638 | 66.3 |
| Task | Succ./trials | Dominant failure mode |
|---|---|---|
| Reactive catching | 2 / 10 | Arm workspace differs from operator’s |
| Carrying a water jug | 9 / 10 | Jug tips out of the grasp |
| Pushing a wheeled chair | 5 / 10 | Chair heading hard to steer |
| Sitting on a chair | 7 / 10 | Chair out of view after turning |
| Hanging a coat | 6 / 10 | Hanger orientation uncontrolled |
Robot Teleoperation
Robot teleoperation studies how people remotely control robots through interfaces, sensing, feedback, and autonomy, despite distance, delay, and embodiment gaps.
See all 206 papers