Navigating human-robot interaction challenges in private and residential aged care homes
Organizations: CSIRO, Imaging and Computer Vision Group, Canberra, Australia · Queensland University of Technology, School of Electrical Engineering and Robotics, Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence and Vision Technologies (SAIVT Lab), Brisbane, Australia · CSIRO, Australian e-Health Research Centre, Sydney, Australia · UNSW Medicine & Health, International Centre for Future Health Systems, Sydney, Australia
Abstract
This chapter explores how robotic systems and ambient intelligence can enhance care for older adults in residential aged care (RAC) homes and private homes. Although these settings differ, we frame both as extreme and challenging environments for human-robot interaction (HRI), characterised by cluttered and dynamic layouts, diverse resident needs, and limited on-site technical support. We review embodied and non-embodied systems that assist with daily living, safety monitoring, and social engagement, highlighting hybrid deployments where robots complement fixed and wearable sensors. To ensure these technologies are usable and effective, design considerations consider the cognitive, physical, and social needs of older adults. Interaction design prioritises accessibility for older adults with low digital literacy, using robust but simple voice interfaces, small sets of non-verbal cues, accessible screen-based companions, and safe object handovers. Privacy, trust, and acceptability are addressed via practical strategies such as on-device inference, data minimisation, visible consent controls, and transparent data handling aligned with emerging artificial intelligence (AI) and privacy regulation. Evaluation emphasises real-world metrics including false alarms per day, time to recover from faults, staff workload, and long-term system reliability. We close by outlining open research challenges and future directions for scalable, regulation-ready deployments that support aging with dignity, safety, and independence.
Figures & tables
| Dimension | Residential care homes | Private homes |
| Supervision and presence of staff | Staff are usually on-site, with scheduled rounds and defined escalation pathways. Monitoring can be continuous in some areas and intermittent in others. | No formal on-site staff. Support is typically provided by family, visiting carers, or community services, often with long gaps between visits. |
| Policy and governance context | Operate under aged care regulations, clinical governance, infection prevention policies, and facility-level procedures. Technology must fit accreditation and audit requirements. | Governed mainly by consumer protection, tenancy or home ownership arrangements, and general privacy and safety laws. Policies and record-keeping practices vary widely by household. |
| Environmental variability | Layouts are somewhat standardised within a facility, with repeated room types and shared areas, although furniture and equipment may still move. | Highly heterogeneous and personalised. Floor plans, furniture, lighting, and clutter vary from home to home and change over time. |
| Available technical and care support | Some access to internal information technology and maintenance teams, plus nursing and care staff who can help reset or reposition devices when trained. | Very limited technical support on site. Households rely on remote support, ad hoc local help, or do it themselves, often with low digital literacy. |
| Mobility aids and assistive equipment | High prevalence of walkers, wheelchairs, hoists, oxygen stands, and shared medical equipment in corridors and rooms, with associated trip and collision risks. | Mobility aids may be present but are more idiosyncratic and less standardised. Distribution across homes is uneven, and storage locations can change frequently. |
Human-Robot Interaction
Human-robot interaction studies how people and robots communicate, coordinate, and safely work or live together.
See all 452 papers