Towards Field-Deployable Wearable IMU Systems for Occupational Activity Recognition
Organizations: Centre for Computational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, United Kingdom · School of Architecture and Built Environment Deakin University, Australia · School of Information Technology Deakin University, Australia
Abstract
Wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) systems for construction worker human activity recognition (HAR) routinely report aggregate accuracies above 95 %, rarely under genuine subject-independent (leave-one-subject-out (LOSO)) evaluation, masking the per-individual variance that determines real-world deployment performance. Using the VTT-ConIoT benchmark, we conduct, to our knowledge, the first systematic configuration sensitivity analysis of this dataset: six classifiers across five sensor placements and three window sizes under a single LOSO protocol, a personalised-calibration pilot, and a validated comparison of tabular GAN-based and standard time-series augmentation. Per-subject LOSO accuracy for the main multi-sensor, 16-class configuration ranges from 61.9 % to 88.7 % (mean 77.5 %), a 27 pp spread, though all data are laboratory-collected. Multi-sensor fusion and longer windows both improve accuracy; standard augmentation gives small, consistent gains, while Conditional Tabular GAN (CTGAN) augmentation actively harms accuracy with a demonstrated distributional-fidelity mechanism; and personalised calibration recovers 16.8 pp for the weakest participants from just 30 % of their own data. These findings provide evidence-grounded configuration guidance for scaling occupational body sensor networks towards field deployment
Figures & tables
| Clf. | All | Back | Hand | Trouser | Trsr-Accel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | 77.5 | 67.9 | 66.4 | 53.1 | 41.8 |
| ET | 76.6 | 66.8 | 64.9 | 52.1 | 37.4 |
| RF | 76.4 | 67.1 | 65.1 | 55.0 | 38.2 |
| XGB | 75.9 | 67.0 | 66.6 | 54.3 | 38.4 |
| LDA | 73.3 | 59.8 | 60.2 | 49.4 | 42.7 |
| LR | 70.8 | 63.3 | 62.8 | 53.3 | 46.9 |
| Clf. | Base | +StdAug | +CTGAN | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF | 73.3 | 73.5 | +0.2 | 72.1 | -2.0 |
| ET | 73.0 | 73.6 | +0.6 | 73.6 | -0.1 |
| LDA | 69.7 | 69.5 | -0.1 | 63.6 | -5.5 |
| LR | 66.1 | 66.8 | +0.7 | 64.5 | -1.4 |
| SVM | 73.3 | 74.1 | +0.7 | 72.4 | -1.4 |
Human Activity Recognition
Human activity recognition classifies actions and behaviors from wearable sensors, video, radio signals, and other measurements.
See all 228 papers