Can Entanglement-Induced Feature-Map Designs Improve Projected Quantum Kernels?
Organizations: Simula UiB, N–5006 Bergen, Norway
Abstract
Projected quantum kernels (PQKs) have emerged as a notable approach to circumvent the hardness of machine learning tasks arising from the exponential dimensionality of the quantum Hilbert space. However, recent PQK studies often rely heavily on extensive classical hyperparameter tuning of the radial basis function (RBF) kernel parameter and the support vector machine regularization parameter. The extensive tuning can mask the true representational power of the underlying PQKs induced by quantum feature maps, which has not been explored in detail. Thus, this work aims to expose the structural capabilities of PQKs by isolating and evaluating their native inductive bias through comparisons between untuned and tuned PQKs against the RBF baseline. Furthermore, we propose novel quantum feature maps that leverage two-qubit entanglement to capture multivariate correlations in IoT data. The results show that extensive tuning can lead to competitive performance architectures, while our proposed entanglement topologies exhibit a significantly stronger native inductive bias. This reveals that superior quantum architectural design can yield structurally better PQKs with improvements arising from quantum-mechanical properties rather than from classical hyperparameter tuning.
Figures & tables
| Models | Accuracy | F1-score | MCC |
| Lin | |||
| RBF | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.826\pm 0.017 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.820\pm 0.021 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.670\pm 0.033 |
| LDA | |||
| RF | |||
| AB |
| Models | |||||||||
| Accuracy | F1-score | MCC | Accuracy | F1-score | MCC | Accuracy | F1-score | MCC | |
| \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.853\pm 0.015 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.842\pm 0.017 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.711\pm 0.030 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.855\pm 0.013 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.847\pm 0.012 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.720\pm 0.026 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.859\pm 0.015 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.850\pm 0.016 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.726\pm 0.030 | |
| \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.864\pm 0.012 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.858\pm 0.015 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.742\pm 0.023 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.852\pm 0.013 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.843\pm 0.015 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.714\pm 0.026 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.864\pm 0.013 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.857\pm 0.015 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.740\pm 0.026 | |
| +CNOT | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.844\pm 0.013 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.832\pm 0.015 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.693\pm 0.027 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.839\pm 0.013 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.829\pm 0.016 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.688\pm 0.022 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.857\pm 0.014 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.849\pm 0.017 | \color[rgb]{0,0,1}0.724\pm 0.027 |
Quantum Kernel Methods
Quantum kernel methods use quantum feature maps and similarity measures to learn patterns, with potential benefits for structured data and quantum systems.
See all 50 papers