LapaFM: A Laparoscopic Foundation Model via Multi-Stage Continual Learning
Authors: Xiaobo Zhu, Shiwei Wu, Yu An, Yuechen Tao, He Sun, Song Zhang, Jianbo Wang, Xiaojing Wang, Junwei Liu, Wei Guo, Yanfei Shao, Xuan Zhao, Jiangwei Xiao, Wenbo Niu, Bo Wei, Yuhan Wang, Gang Hu, Fei Liu, Kunshan He, Chongwei Chi, Jianqiang Tang, Kang Zhang, Jie Tian, Zhenyu Liu
Organizations: the CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China · the School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China · School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210094, China · School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China · Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China, Beijing, 100191, China · Department of Gastroenterology, Lishui Central Hospital, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, Zhejiang Province, 323020, China · Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi Province, 425599, China · Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Shanghai, 200025, China · Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610500, China · The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050011, China · Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China · the Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China · State Key Laboratory for Eye Health, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325027, China
Artificial intelligence-based analysis of intraoperative laparoscopic videos has the potential to improve surgical decision-making and precision. However, effective surgical assistance requires models that can generalize across diverse intraoperative tasks. Here we present LapaFM, a foundation model for laparoscopic surgery trained on more than 20,000 minutes of surgical videos using a multi-stage continual learning strategy that mitigates catastrophic forgetting and inter-task interference. LapaFM learns multimodal visual representations and supports multiple tasks, including smoke removal, surgical phase recognition, instrument and polyp segmentation, and lesion identification. The model was evaluated on 13 retrospective and two prospective cohorts collected from different imaging devices. LapaFM consistently outperformed task-specific models and existing foundation models across datasets, and also generalized to gastrointestinal endoscopy tasks, including polyp detection and classification. Notably, it recovered over 90% of smoke-obscured frames and achieved clinician-level or superior performance in lymph node metastasis prediction and prospective polyp classification.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: A multi-stage continual learning strategy is employed during pretraining. In Stage I, the model learns white-light imaging (WLI) representations. In Stage II, pseudo-color imaging (PCI) features are introduced while reviewing white-light features via a frozen teacher network to mitigate modality conflict and catastrophic forgetting.
Fig. 2: Overview of the proposed smoke removal model. During training, the image reconstruction branch refines the output of the smoke removal branch by leveraging semantic priors extracted from the ground truth via LapaFM. A semantic embedding module is employed to guide high-quality reconstruction. During inference, only the smoke removal branch is retained, while the pretrained prior knowledge from LapaFM is transferred under the supervision of the distillation loss Ldistill .
Model
DS_Synthetic
DS_Real
SSIM ↑
PSNR ↑
CIEDE-2000 ↓
SSIM ↑
PSNR ↑
CIEDE-2000 ↓
AECR-Net (CVPR’21) [ 15 ]
0.949
27.487
3.696
0.870
25.751
4.859
DS-CycleGAN (TCBB’22) [ 16 ]
0.792
20.412
9.495
0.766
21.927
7.688
Cyclic-DeGAN (CBM’20) [ 17 ]
0.865
21.280
7.525
0.833
22.397
7.173
DEA-Net (TIP’24) [ 18 ]
0.964
29.706
2.833
0.846
25.289
5.029
MB-Taylor-B V2 (TPAMI’25) [ 19 ]
0.969
29.551
2.658
0.871
25.883
4.853
TABLE I: Quantitative comparison of LapaFM with seven state-of-the-art desmoking/dehazing models or general image restoration models—AECR-Net, Ds-CycleGAN, Cyclic-DeGAN,DEA-Net, MB-Taylor-B V2, SGDN, and MambaIRv2-S—on both synthetic and real laparoscopic datasets. LapaFM achieves superior performance across all metrics
Fig. 3: Laparoscopic smoke removal visualization. Qualitative results demonstrate that LapaFM effectively removes surgical smoke while preserving anatomical details, outperforming other methods on both synthetic and real data.
Fig. 4: Performance validation for surgical stage recognition task. a. Performance comparison of models on the AutoLaparo dataset for surgical phase recognition task. b. Performance comparison of models on the Cholec80 dataset for surgical phase recognition task.
Endovis2017
Endovis2018
Model
IOU
DICE
IOU
DICE
SSIS-Seg (TMI’22) [ 31 ]
0.867
0.926
0.613
0.661
Active_learning (MIA’24) [ 32 ]
0.736
0.846
0.705
0.816
MCF-SMSIS (CBM’24) [ 33 ]
0.722
0.831
0.663
0.794
SurgicalSAM (AAAI’24) [ 34 ]
0.756
0.857
0.699
0.820
MedSAM (NC’24) [ 35 ]
0.749
0.851
0.694
0.812
TABLE II: Quantitative results on surgical instrument segmentation show that LapaFM outperforms three task-specific models and two general-purpose segmentation models, achieving the highest IoU and Dice scores.
Fig. 5: Visualization of surgical instrument segmentation results. Qualitative results on instrument segmentation demonstrate that LapaFM produces more accurate and coherent edge predictions, supporting enhanced intraoperative navigation.
Fig. 6: Comparison of results for the task of predicting lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. a. Performance comparison of LapaFM on the validation set for the colorectal cancer lymph node metastasis prediction task. b. Performance comparison of LapaFM on the test set for the colorectal cancer lymph node metastasis prediction task.
Pretraining Strategy
Validation Set
Test Set
AUC
AUC
Joint Pretraining
0.783
0.722
Ours
0.797
0. 817
TABLE III: Comparison between multi-stage continuous learning and joint training for lymph node metastasis prediction, demonstrating improved multimodal modeling with reduced modality conflict and knowledge loss.
CVC-ClinicDB
CVC-ColonDB
ETIS
EndoScene
Model
IOU
DICE
IOU
DICE
IOU
DICE
IOU
DICE
Polyper (AAAI’2024) [ 40 ]
0.889
0.942
0.668
0.756
0.785
0.865
0.867
0.924
CFANet (PR’2023) [ 41 ]
0.883
0.933
0.665
0.743
0.655
0.732
0.827
0.893
CoInNet (TMI’2023) [ 42 ]
0.887
0.930
0.729
0.797
0.690
0.759
0.863
0.909
BUNet (NN’2023) [ 43 ]
0.890
0.935
0.731
0.813
0.721
0.798
0.834
0.900
SurgicalSAM (AAAI’2024) [ 34 ]
0.505
0.644
0.330
0.460
0.238
0.342
0.472
0.623
TABLE IV: Quantitative results on surgical instrument segmentation show that LapaFM outperforms three task-specific models and two general-purpose segmentation models, achieving the highest IoU and Dice scores.
Model
Polyp Detection
Polyp Classification
CH-CHILD
WCE-CCD validation set
WCE-CCD test set
ACC
AUC
ACC
F1
ACC
F1
Swin-Transformer (ICCV’21) [ 36 ]
0.956
0.992
0.827
0.821
0.831
0.828
ConvNeXt (CVPR’22) [ 37 ]
0.979
0.992
0.761
0.741
0.795
0.780
Efficientnetv2 (ICML’21) [ 38 ]
0.961
0.994
0.772
0.766
0.792
0.782
GastroNet_5M (GAS’25) [ 30 ]
0.980
0.996
0.941
0.932
0.957
0.935
TABLE V: Comparison of LapaFM performance on polyp detection and classification across the CP-CHILD and WCE-CCD datasets.
Model
Propolyp-cls
Propolyp-detection
ACC
AUC
ACC
AUC
Swin-Transformer(ICCV’21) [ 36 ]
0.646
0.535
0.554
0.523
ConvNeXt (CVPR’22) [ 37 ]
0.667
0.562
0.593
0.529
Efficientnetv2(ICML’21) [ 38 ]
0.671
0.576
0.619
0.645
GastroNet_5M (GAS’25) [ 30 ]
0.687
0.594
0.796
0.81
Dinov3 (Arxiv’25) [ 39 ]
0.675
0.582
0.787
0.779
TABLE VI: Performance comparison of LapaFM on prospective polyp classification and detection tasks across Propolyp-cls and Propolyp-detection dataset.
Fig. 7: Comparison between LapaFM and clinical experts. a. Lymph node metastasis prediction across five gastroenterologists with varying experience levels. b. Polyp classification across six endoscopy experts with varying experience levels.
Fig. 8: Robustness of LapaFM under limited supervision. Performance on instrument segmentation and polyp detection with 10%, 30%, and 50% training data demonstrates superior robustness compared to competing models.
Fig. 9: Effect of surgical smoke on downstream tasks and full-process surgical workflow support. a. Surgical smoke severely degrades segmentation and classification performance by obscuring the visual field. After applying LapaFM-based smoke removal, performance is significantly improved and approaches that of clear images, with no significant difference(ns, P>0.05 ; ∗∗∗ , P<0.001 ), indicating effective recovery of critical visual information. b. LapaFM supports the full laparoscopic workflow, from intraoperative smoke removal to downstream lesion classification.
While foundation models have advanced surgical video analysis, current approaches rely predominantly on pixel-level reconstruction objectives that waste model capacity on low-level visual details, such as smoke, specular reflections, and fluid motion, rather than semantic structures essential for surgical understanding. We present SurgMotion, a video-native foundation model that shifts the learning paradigm from pixel-level reconstruction to latent motion prediction. Built on the Video Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (V-JEPA), SurgMotion introduces three key technical innovations tailored to surgical videos: (1) motion-guided latent masked prediction to prioritize semantically meaningful regions, (2) spatiotemporal affinity self-distillation to enforce relational consistency, and (3) spatiotemporal feature diversity regularization (SFDR) to prevent representation collapse in texture-sparse surgical scenes. To enable large-scale pretraining, we curate SurgMotion-15M, the largest surgical video dataset to date, comprising 3,658 hours of video from 50 sources across 13 anatomical regions. Extensive experiments across 17 benchmarks demonstrate that SurgMotion significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods on surgical workflow recognition, achieving 14.6 percent improvement in F1 score on EgoSurgery and 10.3 percent on PitVis; on action triplet recognition with 39.54 percent mAP-IVT on CholecT50; as well as on skill assessment, polyp segmentation, and depth estimation. These results establish SurgMotion as a new standard for universal, motion-oriented surgical video understanding.
Jinlin Wu, Felix Holm, Chuxi Chen +18
Center for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Hong Kong Institute of Science and Innovation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hong Kong, China · State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany +7
Surgical video understanding is essential for computer-assisted interventions, yet existing surgical foundation models remain constrained by limited data scale, procedural diversity, and inconsistent evaluation, often lacking a reproducible training pipeline. We propose SurgRec, a scalable and reproducible pretraining recipe for surgical video understanding, instantiated with two variants: SurgRec-MAE and SurgRec-JEPA. We curate a large multi-source corpus of 10,535 videos and 214.5M frames spanning endoscopy, laparoscopy, cataract, and robotic surgery. Building on this corpus, we develop a unified pretraining pipeline with balanced sampling and standardize a reproducible benchmark across 16 downstream datasets and four clinical domains with consistent data splits. Across extensive comparisons against SSL baselines and vision-language models, SurgRec consistently achieves superior performance across downstream datasets. In contrast, VLMs prove unreliable for fine-grained temporal recognition, exhibiting both performance gaps and sensitivity to prompt phrasing. Our work provides a reproducible, scalable foundation for the community to build more general surgical video models. All code, models, and data will be publicly released.
Sicheng Lu, Zikai Xiao, Jianhui Wei +7
The Johns Hopkins University, United States · Zhejiang University, China · Zhejiang University-University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Institute, China +4
During laparoscopic surgery, smoke generated by tissue cauterization can significantly degrade the visual quality of endoscopic frames, increasing the risk of surgical errors and hindering both clinical decision-making and computer-assisted visual analysis. Consequently, removing surgical smoke is critical to ensuring patient safety and maintaining operative efficiency. In this study, we propose the Surgical Atmospheric Model (SurgiATM) for surgical smoke removal. SurgiATM statistically bridges a physics-based atmospheric model and data-driven deep learning models, combining the superior generalizability of the former with the high accuracy of the latter. Furthermore, SurgiATM is designed as a lightweight module that can be easily integrated into existing surgical desmoking architectures with minimal modification, aiming to enhance their accuracy and stability. The proposed method is derived via statistically optimizing a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model at the output end of arbitrary deep learning methods, with a Laplacian-like error distribution specifically leveraged to model surgical smoke. The output-stage MoE ensures minimal modification to the architecture of the original methods, while the Laplacian-like distribution characteristic of surgical smoke enables a lightweight reconstruction formulation with minimal parameters. Therefore, SurgiATM introduces only two hyperparameters and no additional trainable weights, preserving the original network architecture with minimal computational and modification overhead. We conduct extensive experiments on three public surgical datasets with ten desmoking methods, involving multiple network architectures and covering diverse procedures, including cholecystectomy, partial nephrectomy, and diaphragm dissection.
Mingyu Sheng, Jianan Fan, Dongnan Liu +3
School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia · Institute of Medical Robotics, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China · Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States