World action models have demonstrated promising performance in robot policy learning, yet their high inference latency remains a critical bottleneck for real-world deployment. Recent approaches have sought to improve inference efficiency by reducing test-time future-frame imagination or accelerating action prediction. However, these methods often leverage representations from all video world model layers without explicitly considering their varying relevance to action prediction, leading to redundant computation and suboptimal representation utilization. In this work, we propose TurboWAM, a fast world action model that efficiently aggregates structured world representations conditioned on action predictions. Specifically, TurboWAM introduces a structured world representation aggregation module that adaptively fuses representations from different world model layers according to their relevance to the evolving action denoising state. Furthermore, TurboWAM employs a structured action supervision mechanism that adaptively modulates gradients from action supervision across different world model layers during backward propagation, facilitating world representation learning. During inference, by reducing the number of world model layers executed and caching relevant representations across action denoising steps, TurboWAM substantially reduces computational overhead. Extensive experiments on multiple robot manipulation benchmarks demonstrate that TurboWAM achieves low inference latency while maintaining competitive task success rates compared with state-of-the-art methods.
Figures & tables
Figure 2: Overview of the TurboWAM framework. The structured world representation aggregation module adaptively fuses representations from different world model layers according to the current action denoising state. The structured action supervision mechanism modulates action-supervision gradients across world model layers during the backward pass. Together, these complementary designs reduce inference latency while maintaining competitive task success rates.
Figure 3: Motivation for the proposed TurboWAM. (a) Distribution of fusion weights across world model layers in Faster-WAM. (b) Spatial feature relationships at different world-model depths in Faster-WAM, visualized through cosine similarity between the reference location (close to the gripper) and other spatial locations. (c) Influence of individual world model layers at different denoising steps in Faster-WAM, measured by the relative change in predicted action velocity when the key/value pairs from a given layer are excluded from fusion. (d) Routing distance across denoising steps, measured by the total variation distance between two layer-wise fusion weight distributions.
Type
Method
EPT
LIBERO
RoboTwin 2.0
Spatial ↑
Object ↑
Goal ↑
Long ↑
Avg ↑
Latency ↓ (ms)
Clean ↑
Rand ↑
Avg ↑
Latency ↓ (ms)
VLA ‡
X-VLA [ 28 ]
✓
98.2
98.6
97.8
97.8
98.1
113.3
72.9
72.8
72.9
125.0
π0.5 [ 3 ]
✓
98.8
98.2
98.0
92.4
96.9
42.0
82.7
76.8
79.8
36.7
WAM
CosmosPolicy [ 11 ]
✓
98.1
100.0
98.2
97.6
98.5
296.9
–
–
–
–
Motus [ 2 ]
✓
96.8
99.8
96.6
97.6
97.7
1555.3
88.7
87.0
87.8
1534.7
LingBot-VA [ 14 ]
✓
98.5
99.6
97.2
98.5
98.5
3032.3
92.9
91.5
92.2
3328.0
Table 1: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on LIBERO and RoboTwin 2.0. EPT: Embodied Pre-Training. † Implementation based on the arXiv:2608.02365v1 version. ‡ VLA results are for reference only.
Type
Method
EPT
LIBERO-Plus
Camera ↑
Robot ↑
Language ↑
Light ↑
Background ↑
Sensor ↑
Object ↑
Avg ↑
Latency (ms) ↓
VLA ‡
X-VLA [ 28 ]
✓
23.4
89.7
75.7
88.2
96.0
62.7
71.8
71.4
128.9
π0.5 [ 3 ]
✓
75.4
77.5
85.6
96.9
94.6
89.7
85.7
85.7
42.4
WAM
CosmosPolicy [ 11 ]
✓
75.8
63.3
81.7
96.5
88.9
92.7
82.2
82.2
323.8
LingBot-VA [ 14 ]
✓
40.9
83.0
86.4
82.3
53.1
64.4
76.2
69.5
3757.0
Faster-WAM ∗ [ 18 ]
✗
71.6
54.0
89.6
93.6
55.3
81.6
80.2
75.3
84.9
Table 2: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on LIBERO-Plus across seven perturbation categories. TurboWAM + denotes results obtained with corrected language prompts following https://github.com/sylvestf/LIBERO-plus/issues/64.
Figure 4: Qualitative comparison of task execution. Each row illustrates the progression of task execution from left to right. For clarity, we show only the primary camera view. Additional multi-camera visualizations are provided in the supplementary material.
TurboWAM + [following method]
LIBERO
LIBERO-Plus
Structured aggregation (default)
99.0
78.1
w/o the learned static logit
98.8
77.3
Direct average over layers
98.5
75.9
DoT aggregation [ 18 ]
98.8
77.0
Table 3: Ablation study on structured representation aggregation. Average success rate ↑ is reported.
TurboWAM + [following method]
LIBERO
LIBERO-Plus
Structured supervision (default)
99.0
78.1
Ordinary gradients
97.9
69.2
Gradient isotropic scaling
98.4
75.2
Gradient insulating [ 6 ]
93.9
56.6
Table 4: Ablation study on structured action supervision. Average success rate ↑ is reported.
World Action Models (WAMs) extend robot policy learning by incorporating future prediction as an additional training objective, encouraging the policy to encode task-relevant temporal structure in its representations. Current WAMs often rely on large-scale generative architectures that incur high training costs and inference latency, making them difficult to deploy as efficient closed-loop policies. We propose Light-WAM, a lightweight World Action Model for efficient robot manipulation. Specifically, it is built with a compact video backbone and performs future-video supervision in a downsampled latent space, reducing the cost of video co-training while retaining its benefits for representation learning. For action prediction, Light-WAM introduces the StateFusionActionExpert, which reads adapted states from multiple backbone layers, fuses them through learned-query pooling, and directly predicts action chunks in a single forward pass. This design provides an efficient interface between video backbone representations and robot actions, avoiding the need for heavy generative action experts. Experiments demonstrate that Light-WAM maintains strong performance on LIBERO and achieves usable multi-task performance on RoboTwin 2.0, while using only 0.44B trainable parameters. It also achieves 72.03ms inference latency with 4.1GiB peak GPU memory and improved training throughput.
Ziang Li, Dongzhou Cheng, Yibin Wang +5
Wuhan University · Shanghai Innovation Institute · Southeast University +2
World Action Models (WAMs) improve robot manipulation by learning how the environment evolves beyond the current observation. However, existing approaches face a fundamental dilemma: Joint-WAMs preserve future-aware representations during inference but incur prohibitive computation costs, while efficient alternatives remove future modeling at inference time and may lose the robustness benefits of temporal reasoning. In this work, we revisit the role of future representations in WAMs and show that inference-time future conditioning is critical for generalization under distribution shifts. This observation motivates Faster-WAM, an efficient future-conditioning WAM that preserves future representations while avoiding expensive video-action interaction. Faster-WAM introduces a sparse future-conditioning framework that computes future representations once and selectively reuses them throughout action denoising. Specifically, we propose SparseMoT to replace ubiquitous layer-wise fusion with selective video-action interaction at a compact subset of network stages, and Interval KV-Fusion to aggregate multi-depth future representations without increasing attention complexity. Experiments demonstrate that Faster-WAM achieves a substantially better performance-efficiency trade-off than existing WAMs. On the out-of-distribution LIBERO-Plus benchmark, Faster-WAM improves success rate from 49.14% to 73.57% compared with Fast-WAM, while running 2.21× faster than Joint-WAM. It further achieves state-of-the-art performance on LIBERO and RoboTwin 2.0, while demonstrating strong robustness in real-world manipulation.
Weiheng Zhao, Haoyi Jiang, Xin Shi +5
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · D-Robotics · Horizon Robotics +1
World Action Models (WAMs) combine visual dynamics modeling with action generation, but their high inference latency limits responsive robot control. Recent efforts accelerate inference by removing explicit future-video generation at test time, as in FastWAM, an approach that requires a specially tailored architectural design. More general caching strategies exploit feature redundancy, but redundancy alone does not capture the changing computational demands of closed-loop control. To address these challenges, we present RealtimeWAM, a general, training-free framework that coordinates parallel execution with adaptive computation for low-latency inference across diverse WAM architectures. We exploit layerwise dependencies to overlap observation processing with prediction. However, concurrent branches still compete for GPU resources, limiting the benefit of parallel execution. We therefore adapt computation throughout the pipeline through selective reuse, caching observation features in visually stable regions and reusing Transformer residuals while reserving additional refinement for small predicted adjustments. We evaluate RealtimeWAM on FastWAM and OpenWAM across RoboTwin, LIBERO, and LIBERO-Plus. On an RTX 4090, measured mean inference latencies are 24.09 and 63.09 ms, corresponding to average speedups of 8.90× and 10.67×. Average success rates are 82.75% and 87.41%, respectively, within 0.02 and 0.53 percentage points of native inference. Across five real-world tasks, RealtimeWAM improves average success rates over native inference by 17.2 and 37.2 percentage points on FastWAM and OpenWAM, respectively.
Huanan Liu, Ye Li, Kangye Ji +8
Tsinghua University · YuanxingGuangnian Robotics · Nanjing University