Learning to Read Braille: Benchmarking and Improving Braille Recognition Capabilities of VLMs

Although Large language models (LLMs) mediate access to knowledge and computational assistance, their capabilities should benefit vulnerable groups in the same way. However, it is unclear whether existing AI systems are inclusive enough for blind and deafblind users to access the same functionality through Braille, whose indicators, contractions, and digital representations introduce distinct requirements for model comprehension. To this end, we introduce BrailleBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs in Braille comprehension from different Criteria. BrailleBench aligns 5,570 instances from five datasets, including mathematics, commonsense, and multi-hop question answering across English and Braille Grades 1 and 2. Different configurations are designed to understand whether the systems can comprehend Braille-authored content, express answers in Braille, and complete end-to-end Braille interaction. To ensure the quality and prevent evaluation bias, the benchmark is built through a deterministic, expert-reviewed pipeline via a self-created Braille Toolkit without using any data instances generated by LLMs. We evaluate six representative LLMs from various aspects. The results reveal a persistent gap between print-English capability and Braille accessibility. Braille understanding and expression are asymmetric, where Grade 2 is especially fragile on the input side compared to Grade 1, and fully Braille requests further reduce performance. The experimental observations provide valuable guidance for the development of future Braille AI systems. All related resources in BrailleBench are publicly available for future research.

Large Language Models (LLMs) perform strongly on many language tasks, but their capability in structurally constrained, accessibility-critical modalities such as Braille remains unclear. We evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs on bidirectional Korean-Braille translation using a human-annotated dataset. Despite expectations that multilingual, instruction-tuned models can generalize to Braille via text representations, we find consistently poor, unstable outputs and substantial disagreement with human judgments. These results point to missing Braille-aware tokenization and weak alignment between Korean and Braille patterns. In contrast, supervised fine-tuning of a small model (T5-small) on the same data yields large and stable gains over zero-shot and prompted LLM baselines across standard metrics (SacreBLEU, ChrF++, CER, BLEU, ROUGE-L, METEOR, CIDEr). Our findings reveal a systematic limitation of current LLMs and demonstrate the effectiveness of modest task-specific supervision.

Vision-Language Models achieve near-perfect accuracy at reading text in images, yet prove largely typography-blind: capable of recognizing what text says, but not how it looks. We systematically investigate this gap by evaluating font family, size, style, and color recognition across 26 fonts, four scripts, and three difficulty levels. Our evaluation of 15 state-of-the-art VLMs reveals a striking perception hierarchy: color recognition is near-perfect, yet font style detection remains universally poor. We further find that model scale fails to predict performance and that accuracy is uniform across difficulty levels, together pointing to a training-data omission rather than a capacity ceiling. LoRA fine-tuning on a small set of synthetic samples substantially improves an open-source model, narrowing the gap to the best closed-source system and surpassing it on font size recognition. Font style alone remains resistant to fine-tuning, suggesting that relational visual reasoning may require architectural innovation beyond current patch-based encoders. We release our evaluation framework, data, and fine-tuning recipe to support progress in closing the typographic gap in vision-language understanding.