physics.geo-phOct 26, 2026

Expert lithological labels do not improve learning when used to predict marine sediment properties

Authors: John M. Aiken, William Gilpin, Thorsten W. Becker

Organizations: University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway · Expert Analytics, Oslo, Norway · Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA · Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA · 

Abstract

Scientific drilling has produced large archives of physical, chemical and magnetic measurements linked to descriptions of the rock recovered. These archives are mostly incomplete: instruments sample at different intervals, recovery is partial, and destructive analyses preclude later measurement of the same material. We train an self-supervised embedding model on the LILY ocean drilling database using six routinely logged properties (bulk density, magnetic susceptibility, natural gamma radiation, and red, green and blue reflectance) across 236,963 observations from 296 boreholes, with a masked variational autoencoder that has a heteroscedastic Gaussian decoder and learnable mask tokens. The embeddings separate geologist-assigned lithologies as well as a variant trained with those labels, and increasing the weight on the labels degrades reconstruction while leaving classification unchanged. The labels are recoverable from the measurements geologists use to assign them, so training on them adds nothing. Lithological categories compress continuous measurements into classes, and compressing them discards what the measurements record about the processes that produced the rock. The embeddings also predict physical properties that were absent from training, on boreholes the model has never seen. While depth should account for this since sediments compact with burial, it does not. On held-out boreholes depth alone reaches a median R2R^2 of -0.02, against 0.20 for the embedding.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables1 asset

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

May 8, 2026

LithoBench: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models for Remote-Sensing Lithology Interpretation

Remote sensing lithology interpretation is fundamental to geological surveys, mineral exploration, and regional geological mapping. Unlike general land-cover recognition, lithology interpretation is a knowledge-intensive task that requires experts to infer rock types from various features, e.g., subtle visual, spectral, textural, geomorphological, and contextual cues, making reliable automated interpretation highly challenging. Geological knowledge-guided large multimodal models offer new opportunities, yet their evaluation remains constrained by the lack of benchmarks that capture lithological annotations, multi-level geological semantics, and expert-informed assessment. Here, we propose LithoBench, a multi-level benchmark for evaluating geological semantic understanding in remote sensing lithology interpretation. LithoBench contains 10,000 expert-annotated interpretation instances across 12 representative lithological categories, including 4,000 multiple-choice and 6,000 open-ended tasks organized into five cognitive levels: Identification and Description, Comparative Analysis, Mechanism Explanation, Practical Application, and Comprehensive Reasoning. We further develop an expert-in-the-loop, knowledge-grounded semi-automated construction pipeline, coupling multi sub-processes, e.g., structured geological image descriptions, to enhance geological validity and evaluation reliability. Experiments with multiple large vision-language models eveal substantial limitations in geological semantic understanding, particularly on higher-order explanation, application, and reasoning tasks.
Mar 10, 2026

GIAT: A Geologically-Informed Attention Transformer for Lithology Identification

Accurate lithology identification from well logs is crucial for subsurface resource evaluation. Although Transformer-based models excel at sequence modeling, their "black-box" nature and lack of geological guidance limit their performance and trustworthiness. To overcome these limitations, this letter proposes the Geologically-Informed Attention Transformer (GIAT), a novel framework that deeply fuses data-driven geological priors with the Transformer's attention mechanism. The core of GIAT is a new attention-biasing mechanism. We repurpose Category-Wise Sequence Correlation (CSC) filters to generate a geologically-informed relational matrix, which is injected into the self-attention calculation to explicitly guide the model toward geologically coherent patterns. On two challenging datasets, GIAT achieves state-of-the-art performance with an accuracy of up to 95.4%, significantly outperforming existing models. More importantly, GIAT demonstrates exceptional interpretation faithfulness under input perturbations and generates geologically coherent predictions. Our work presents a new paradigm for building more accurate, reliable, and interpretable deep learning models for geoscience applications.
Sep 28, 2026

Physical Cross-Modal Masked Autoencoding for Seismic-to-Well Representation Learning

Learning from scientific measurements often requires aligning modalities with different spatial support and resolution. Subsurface characterization is an extreme dense-sparse problem in which 3D seismic provides volumetric but indirect measurements and well logs provide high-resolution 1D measurements at sparse borehole locations. We introduce a physically grounded cross-modal masked autoencoder (CM-MAE) for seismic-to-well representation learning. The model jointly tokenizes seismic volumes and well-log depth patches, embeds both modalities in continuous physical coordinates using four-axis rotary position embeddings, and reconstructs masked targets with a cross-modal decoder. Sparse Mixture-of-Experts layers provide modality-specific capacity while dense attention allows information exchange between modalities. Pretraining uses 23 seismic volumes covering approximately 178,000 square km across U.S. offshore and onshore basins, together with approximately 92,000 wells. Matched-mask ablations show strongly asymmetric information flow. Seismic context improves held-out well-log reconstruction by 9.73%, while well-log context improves seismic reconstruction by 0.65%. We evaluate seismic-only pseudo-log predictions against independent interpreter-drawn salt-geobody masks to determine whether they contain geologic signal. Across offshore U.S. surveys, compressional-slowness-derived salt scores reach an AUROC of 0.910. In onshore basins, predicted compressional slowness preserves formation-scale structure and partial relative organization in an unseen survey despite calibration drift. CM-MAE learns useful seismic-to-well representations under extreme modality asymmetry, although absolute pseudo-log calibration remains survey-dependent.