Expert lithological labels do not improve learning when used to predict marine sediment properties
Organizations: University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway · Expert Analytics, Oslo, Norway · Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA · Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA ·
Abstract
Scientific drilling has produced large archives of physical, chemical and magnetic measurements linked to descriptions of the rock recovered. These archives are mostly incomplete: instruments sample at different intervals, recovery is partial, and destructive analyses preclude later measurement of the same material. We train an self-supervised embedding model on the LILY ocean drilling database using six routinely logged properties (bulk density, magnetic susceptibility, natural gamma radiation, and red, green and blue reflectance) across 236,963 observations from 296 boreholes, with a masked variational autoencoder that has a heteroscedastic Gaussian decoder and learnable mask tokens. The embeddings separate geologist-assigned lithologies as well as a variant trained with those labels, and increasing the weight on the labels degrades reconstruction while leaving classification unchanged. The labels are recoverable from the measurements geologists use to assign them, so training on them adds nothing. Lithological categories compress continuous measurements into classes, and compressing them discards what the measurements record about the processes that produced the rock. The embeddings also predict physical properties that were absent from training, on boreholes the model has never seen. While depth should account for this since sediments compact with burial, it does not. On held-out boreholes depth alone reaches a median of -0.02, against 0.20 for the embedding.
Figures & tables
| Model | (recon) | ARI | AUC (probe) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full models | |||
| Self-supervised VAE | 0.999 [0.999, 1.000] | 0.237 [0.204, 0.283] | 0.958 [0.956, 0.965] |
| Semi-supervised VAE | 0.999 [0.999, 0.999] | 0.247 [0.214, 0.290] | 0.959 [0.955, 0.964] |
| Ablations, one component changed | |||
| Fixed-variance decoder | 0.976 [0.972, 0.982] | 0.224 [0.206, 0.267] | 0.939 [0.933, 0.949] |
| Zero masking | 0.999 [0.999, 1.000] | 0.237 [0.203, 0.280] | 0.960 [0.957, 0.963] |
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Materials Property Prediction
Materials property prediction uses data and physical models to estimate how composition, structure, and processing determine a material’s behavior.
See all 173 papers