Organizations: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Amap, Alibaba Group · Tsinghua University · University of Science and Technology Beijing · NLPR, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASIA)
World Action Models (WAMs) learn representations for robot control by coupling future visual prediction with action generation. Successful manipulation depends primarily on how the robot and task-relevant objects evolve, whereas future-video prediction must also reconstruct the appearance and background of the entire scene. We therefore propose Trace-WAM, which augments video-action learning with future 3D motion prediction as an auxiliary objective. This objective supervises temporal point correspondence together with image-plane displacement and depth change, directly describing the interaction dynamics and spatial changes involved in manipulation. To this end, we adopt a three-branch Mixture-of-Transformer (Tri-MoT) architecture to jointly learn video prediction, motion prediction, and action generation. The motion expert predicts future trajectories from current visual features, allowing motion supervision to shape the representations used for action generation. Because the action expert does not consume predicted trajectories, inference retains the current-observation policy path: a single visual forward pass followed by action denoising. Experiments on RoboCasa-GR1, LIBERO, and LIBERO-Plus demonstrate strong in-distribution performance and out-of-distribution generalization, with particularly clear gains over Fast-WAM under limited demonstrations and distribution shifts.
Figures & tables
Figure 2: Depth complements image-plane motion. (a) Depth-change survival curves over 32-step point tracks whose maximum 2D displacement is at least 2% of the image diagonal. Depth change is maxk∣dt+k−dt∣/dt . LIBERO uses simulator depth; Real uses estimated relative depth. (b) Retaining depth in motion supervision improves LIBERO-Plus success ( Tab. 4 ).
Figure 3: Overview of Trace-WAM. Left: three Transformer experts jointly learn future video prediction, 3D motion prediction, and action generation. Right: colored cells allow attention among the illustrated video, motion, and action streams. At inference, future-video and motion prediction are removed, and action denoising uses cached visual keys and values.
Method
P.T.
Few-shot
Full
GR00T N1.6 [ 2 ]
✓
–
47.6
StarVLA-OFT [ 9 ]
×
–
48.8
StarVLA- α [ 45 ]
×
–
53.8
ABot-M0 [ 43 ]
✓
–
58.3
RLDX-1 [ 15 ]
✓
–
58.7
JoyAI-RA [ 50 ]
✓
–
63.2
Table 1: In-distribution performance on RoboCasa-GR1. Success rates (%) in the few-shot and full-data settings. P.T. indicates additional robotic pretraining. DIAL is trained without human data; Best and second-best results are shown in bold and underlined, respectively.
Figure 4: Few-shot OOD generalization on RoboCasa-GR1.
Method
P.T.
Task Suite
Avg.
Spatial
Object
Goal
Long
OpenVLA [ 18 ]
✓
84.7
88.4
79.2
53.7
76.5
OpenVLA-OFT [ 16 ]
✓
97.6
98.4
97.9
94.5
97.1
UniVLA [ 5 ]
✓
96.5
96.8
95.6
92.0
95.2
π0 [ 3 ]
✓
96.8
98.8
95.8
85.2
94.2
π0 -FAST [ 33 ]
✓
96.4
96.8
88.6
60.2
85.5
Table 2: Quantitative comparison on LIBERO [ 27 ] . Success rates (%) across four task suites.
Method
P.T.
Perturbation Type
Avg.
Camera
Robot
Language
Light
Background
Noise
Layout
OpenVLA [ 18 ]
✓
0.8
3.5
23.0
8.1
34.8
15.2
28.5
15.6
OpenVLA-OFT [ 16 ]
✓
56.4
31.9
79.5
88.7
93.3
75.8
74.2
69.6
UniVLA [ 5 ]
✓
1.8
46.2
69.6
69.0
81.0
21.2
31.9
42.9
π0 [ 3 ]
✓
13.8
6.0
58.8
85.0
81.4
79.0
68.8
53.6
π0 -FAST [ 33 ]
✓
65.1
21.6
61.0
73.2
73.2
74.4
68.8
61.6
Table 3: Zero-shot transfer from LIBERO to LIBERO-Plus [ 11 ] . Success rates (%) across seven perturbation types.
Method
Camera
Robot
Language
Light
Background
Noise
Layout
Avg.
1) Motion Supervision Ablation
w/o Motion FM-split
55.7
84.5
89.2
96.1
70.5
85.1
83.7
80.4
w/o Static-Motion Penalty
60.9
86.9
93.4
97.3
75.3
88.1
85
83.6
2) Motion Conditioning Ablation
Motion Inject
61.7
82.8
93.4
96.3
73.1
81
84.9
81.6
Video–Motion Bid-Attention
54.4
83.5
94
96.2
68.3
82.3
84.8
80.3
Table 4: Ablation Studies on LIBERO-Plus. Success rates (%) across seven perturbation types. (1) Motion supervision ablates moving/static balancing in LM and the static-motion penalty Lzero . (2) Motion conditioning compares auxiliary supervision with Motion Inject and bidirectional video–motion attention. (3) Motion representation compares 2D/3D motion and raw-motion/B-spline targets. Best and second-best results are shown in bold and underlined, respectively.
Motion Representation
8 Steps
16 Steps
32 Steps
Image-Plane ADE (pixels, ↓ )
Raw Motion (Direct32)
0.92
1.25
1.87
B-spline Motion
0.67
0.95
1.43
Depth MAE (mm, ↓ )
Raw Motion (Direct32)
1.634
2.297
3.427
B-spline Motion
1.277
1.808
2.768
Table 5: Motion Prediction Accuracy on LIBERO-Plus. We aggregate 140 rollout episodes at each horizon; lower is better.
Figure 5: Real-world Experiments. Left: a Piper arm with fixed-view and wrist-view RealSense D435i cameras. Center: four observed frames from a successful Trace-WAM execution of each task. Right: task success rates over 20 trials per task.
Figure 6: Qualitative future 3D motion predictions on LIBERO-Plus. The overlays visualize B-spline motion predictions over a 32-step horizon.
World Action Models (WAMs) improve robot policy learning by incorporating future dynamics, yet explicitly generating future videos at inference introduces substantial computational overhead. Removing future generation improves efficiency, but leaves future dynamics only implicitly encoded in observation features, which can limit robustness under distribution shifts. We propose MoWAM, an efficient WAM that replaces future video generation with explicit future motion prediction. Instead of reconstructing the complete future scene, MoWAM models structured robot motion as a compact abstraction of the future, capturing how the robot is expected to evolve under the current scene and interaction constraints. A Mixture-of-Transformer architecture learns future visual dynamics during training while jointly predicting motion and action, allowing video generation to be removed entirely at inference while retaining an explicit representation of the future. The compact motion representation further enables efficient inference-time scaling by sampling multiple candidates of motion and action pairs and selecting among them with a motion-aware task-progress verifier. Experiments on LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, and real-world manipulation tasks demonstrate that MoWAM achieves strong in-distribution performance, improved out-of-distribution robustness, and higher average real-world success than representative WAM baselines. In addition, performance improves as more candidates are explored, demonstrating that explicit future motion provides an effective and efficient basis for inference-time scaling.
Jiayu Wang, Bin Zhu, Yue Yu +1
College of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China · Singapore Management University, Singapore · Institute of Trustworthy Embodied AI, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Dynamic object manipulation requires robots to anticipate target motion while replanning fast enough to avoid executing outdated actions. Existing approaches either rely on fast reactive control without an explicit future target state or encode anticipated motion only implicitly. World Action Models (WAMs) offer a promising alternative by coupling future visual prediction with action generation, but scene-level video objectives may underrepresent target dynamics that are critical for manipulation, while iterative video-action denoising introduces substantial latency. We present TrajWAM, a trajectory-guided world action model for efficient dynamic robotic manipulation. Our key insight is to explicitly ground future visual imagination in predicted target-object motion and use the resulting future representation to condition action generation, while preserving this anticipation pathway after acceleration. Given a short history of object masks, a history-conditioned motion predictor forecasts future masks encoding the target object's trajectory. A lightweight Trajectory ControlNet then steers a pretrained video model toward trajectory-consistent futures. The resulting future representation conditions an action expert to predict executable action chunks. To enable one-step inference without breaking this interface, we introduce a decoupled distillation scheme that combines distribution matching for the video backbone, Trajectory ControlNet realignment, and action rollout distillation to support accurate one-step action prediction conditioned on the compressed future representation. Comprehensive evaluations in simulation and the real world show that TrajWAM achieves state-of-the-art performance on dynamic object manipulation tasks while enabling efficient one-step video-action inference. Project page: https://kevingeng3.github.io/TrajWAM/.
Haohan Geng, Sha Zhang, Weishuo Sun +7
University of Science and Technology of China. · The Chinese University of Hong Kong. · University of Macau. +1
Cascade world-action models (WAMs) use predicted visual futures to condition robot actions, but inherit costly iterative inference from diffusion-pretrained experts. We ask what a single-step predicted future must preserve to support accurate single-step action prediction. In the evaluated WAM, resampling video noise has little effect on downstream actions, yet naively truncating both streams to one step substantially reduces task success. Video-space supervision only partially closes this gap, and a local sensitivity analysis shows that vision prediction errors have highly unequal consequences for action accuracy. These findings motivate DirectWAM, which converts pretrained video and action experts into single-step predictors without stochastic sampling through action-sufficient distillation, while retaining the explicit future-to-action cascade. After learning a one-step action model, we train the future predictor by decoding actions from its own predicted futures and backpropagating demonstration action error through the expert, with an optional future-latent reconstruction loss. The resulting objective evaluates the student-generated future through its downstream control consequences rather than relying on representation matching alone. DirectWAM achieves 97.1% average success across four LIBERO suites and 85.4% on RoboTwin 2.0, outperforming Flash-WAM at the same one-evaluation-per-stream budget. This advantage has also extended to three real-world tasks that we designed. Compared with the full iterative teacher, it reduces inference latency by 28.0×.