Euclidean Crowding-Driven Adaptive Euclidean-Hyperbolic Graph Learning
Organizations: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China · Beijing Key Lab of Intelligent Telecommunications Software and Multimedia, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
Abstract
Hyperbolic graph representation learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for modeling hierarchical data. Unlike Euclidean space, which exhibits polynomial volume growth, hyperbolic space grows exponentially with radius, naturally accommodating tree-like structures without the geometric distortion known as Euclidean crowding. Despite strong empirical performance, the theoretical mechanisms underlying hyperbolic embeddings remain poorly understood. In this work, we provide a geometric quantifcation research for Euclidean crowding, a generalization-theoretic explanation for the superiority of hyperbolic space on hierarchical data, and further develop an adaptive Euclidean-hyperbolic fusion learning framework toward bridging this gap. Specifically, we first establish a geometric quantification of Euclidean crowding by analyzing layer-wise minimum separation in node embeddings, proving that fixed-dimensional Euclidean embeddings of tree-like graphs inevitably exhibit layer-wise crowding that leads to weaker margin-based generalization bounds. Second, we provide a generalization-bound for the superiority of hyperbolic geometry on hierarchical data. Third, we propose EH-Fusion, a geometry-adaptive framework that lifts Euclidean GNN representations into hyperbolic space via exponential mapping and adaptively fuses both geometries based on node-level neighborhood expansion patterns. Extensive experiments validate our theoretical insights and demonstrate the effectiveness of EH-Fusion on benchmark datasets.
Figures & tables
| Model | Disease ( ) | Airport ( ) | Citeseer ( ) | Cora ( ) | ||||||||||||
| 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | |
| poinEmb | 70.5 | 71.8 | 75.2 | 78.2 | 96.2 | 96.5 | 96.7 | 96.7 | 81.4 | 80.7 | 80.3 | 80.9 | 86.1 | 86.4 | 87.8 | 87.8 |
| HNN | 94.2 | 94.0 | 94.2 | 94.1 | 93.8 | 94.1 | 94.3 | 94.3 | 95.5 | 96.2 | 96.1 | 96.3 | 92.6 | 92.8 | 93.7 | 93.5 |
| GCN | 85.8 | 82.4 | 85.5 | 87.1 | 93.1 | 94.1 | 93.9 | 95.1 | 92.2 | 93.7 | 95.2 | 95.8 | 90.6 | 92.6 | 92.9 | 93.8 |
| GAT | 81.9 | 82.8 | 82.2 | 89.9 | 94.3 | 93.3 | 95.3 | 94.1 | 94.8 | 95.8 | 96.6 | 97.2 | 92.3 | 93.8 | 94.5 | 95.2 |
| HGCN | 89.3 | 89.3 | 89.9 | 89.8 | 94.4 | 95.0 | 95.3 | 96.2 | 95.4 | 96.1 | 96.4 | 96.6 | 93.8 | 94.6 | 95.0 | 95.0 |
| Ele-Fashion | |||||
| Model | Image Encoder | dim=8 | dim=16 | dim=32 | dim=64 |
| GCN | ImageBind | 79.45 | 82.43 | 82.46 | 83.52 |
| CLIP | 78.73 | 79.53 | 80.91 | 80.57 | |
| DINOv2 | 79.50 | 80.13 | 80.07 | 81.84 | |
| ViT | 78.35 | 80.46 | 79.80 | 80.81 | |
| GCN2L | ImageBind | 80.34 | 83.08 | 83.30 | 84.29 |
| Disease | Airport | Citeseer | Cora | |
| HGCN | 89.9 | 96.2 | 96.6 | 95.0 |
| GCN | 87.1 | 95.1 | 95.8 | 93.8 |
| +Exp2P | 94.6 | 96.9 | 93.9 | 93.9 |
| +Exp2L | 94.9 | 97.2 | 92.0 | 92.4 |
| +Exp+EH-Fusion | 95.4 | 97.3 | 95.9 | 94.1 |
| FHNN | 96.0 | 96.7 | 95.0 | 94.9 |
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Graph Representation Learning
Graph representation learning develops methods for encoding nodes, edges, and whole graphs for prediction, comparison, and transfer.
See all 305 papers