Which Hand Was Late? Diagnosis for Robot Failure Recovery in Bimanual Tool Use

Deploying visuomotor robots at scale is challenging due to the potential for anomalous failures to degrade performance, cause damage, or endanger human life. Bimanual manipulators are no exception; these robots have vast state spaces comprised of high-dimensional images and proprioceptive signals. Explicitly defining failure modes within such state spaces is infeasible. In this work, we overcome these challenges by training a probabilistic, history informed, world model within the compressed latent space of a pretrained vision foundation model (NVIDIA's Cosmos Tokenizer). The model outputs uncertainty estimates alongside its predictions that serve as non-conformity scores within a conformal prediction framework. We use these scores to develop a runtime monitor, correlating periods of high uncertainty with anomalous failures. To test these methods, we use the simulated Push-T environment and the Bimanual Cable Manipulation dataset, the latter of which we introduce in this work. This new dataset features trajectories with multiple synchronized camera views, proprioceptive signals, and annotated failures from a challenging data center maintenance task. We benchmark our methods against baselines from the anomaly detection and out-of-distribution detection literature, and show that our approach considerably outperforms statistical techniques. Furthermore, we show that our approach requires approximately one twentieth of the trainable parameters as the next-best learning-based approach, yet outperforms it by 3.8% in terms of failure detection rate, paving the way toward safely deploying manipulator robots in real-world environments where reliability is non-negotiable.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used to evaluate robot manipulation outcomes, but existing benchmarks offer limited evidence of cross-domain generalization. We introduce FailBench, a benchmark for robot failure detection comprising 2,197 manipulation attempts across 14 public sources (12 real-world, 2 simulated). In FailBench, 75% of failures occur naturally, and six real-world sources come from non-failure-detection datasets. Evaluating 13 VLM-based detectors, we find the best model achieves only 0.77 mean balanced accuracy. Notably, models fine-tuned for failure detection consistently underperform general-purpose VLMs and their own pretrained baselines. Performance depends heavily on required visual evidence: models approach saturation when outcomes depend on observable object motion, but degrade to near-chance (<0.60 balanced accuracy) on contact-intensive assembly tasks. Error analysis reveals a systematic bias toward predicting success under ambiguous evidence, which persists even with increased reasoning effort. Finally, we show that input-level intervention--spatially localizing and cropping outcome-relevant regions--improves the top detector by 2.4 percentage points without extra training.

This paper presents a comprehensive framework for robot manipulation failure analysis that includes binary failure detection, failure categorization, explanation generation, and the additional capability of failure onset localization, which aims to identify the earliest moment at which a robot execution deviates from a valid task-completion trajectory and is ultimately followed by task failure. To address these tasks, we propose ProTracer, a training-free framework that leverages existing Vision-Language Models (VLMs) together with proprioceptive signals for failure analysis. Our method uses proprioceptive dynamics to identify temporally informative action boundaries and converts richer robot-state signals into structured natural-language descriptions that can be jointly analyzed together with visual observations by the VLM. This design combines the temporal precision of proprioceptive signals with the multimodal reasoning capabilities of modern VLMs without requiring additional model training. We further introduce FailTime, a benchmark with synchronized visual and proprioceptive observations for evaluating conventional failure diagnosis tasks as well as failure onset localization. Experiments demonstrate that ProTracer achieves strong performance across both conventional failure diagnosis tasks and the newly introduced failure onset localization task, highlighting the importance of proprioceptive reasoning for fine-grained temporal failure analysis.