Beyond Low-Pass Dynamics: Frequency-Selective Spiking Reservoirs with Resonant Neurons
Organizations: Delft University of Technology · University of Pisa
Abstract
Spiking reservoir computing combines the training efficiency of fixed recurrent reservoirs with the energy efficiency of event-driven inference, where computation is triggered by sparse spikes rather than executed densely at every timestep. However, existing spiking reservoirs almost exclusively rely on Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) neurons, whose low-pass dynamics limit their ability to distinguish information encoded at different temporal frequencies. We introduce HRF-Res, a liquid state machine in which LIF neurons are replaced by a heterogeneous population of Harmonic Resonate-and-Fire (HRF) neurons. These neurons exhibit intrinsic oscillatory dynamics and selectively respond to input frequencies, enabling the reservoir to capture frequency-specific temporal patterns. The result is more discriminative representations and higher classification accuracy than LIF-based reservoirs, achieved without sacrificing the energy efficiency of spiking computation, with up to 19x lower energy consumption than an equivalent non-spiking oscillatory reservoir. Evaluated on ten benchmarks spanning time series, sequential images, audio spike trains, and neuromorphic vision, HRF-Res achieves state-of-the-art accuracy among spiking reservoir methods. These results demonstrate that introducing frequency-selective dynamics into spiking reservoirs improves representational quality and classification performance while preserving their inherent energy efficiency.
Figures & tables
| Dataset | Model | Acc (%) | Energy (J) |
| sMNIST | HRF-Res | ||
| LIF-Res | |||
| FordA | HRF-Res | ||
| LIF-Res | |||
| SHD | HRF-Res | ||
| LIF-Res |
| Dataset | Method | Neurons | Acc (%) |
| SHD | HRF-Res | 6,000 | |
| Deckers et al. [ 12 ] | 16,000 | ||
| Biswas et al. [ 14 ] | 3,000 | ||
| FordA | HRF-Res | 800 | |
| HRF-Res (large) | 2,500 | ||
| Dey et al. [ 13 ] | 2,500 |
Appendix figures & tables7 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| RON | HRF-Res | ||||||
| Dataset | Synaptic | State | Total | Synaptic | State | Total | Reduction |
| sMNIST | 23.11 | 0.09 | 23.20 | 1.676 | 0.115 | 1.791 | |
| psMNIST | 22.64 | 0.09 | 22.73 | 1.884 | 0.115 | 1.999 | |
| FordA | 14.74 | 0.06 | 14.80 | 0.790 | 0.074 | 0.864 | |
| npCIFAR-10 | 32.97 | 0.11 | 33.08 | 3.450 | 0.147 | 3.597 | |
| Dataset | (Hz) | (Hz) | [HRF-Res] | [LIF-Res] | |
| sMNIST | 0.01 | 2.0 | 6,000 | 0.042 | 0.034 |
| FordA | 0.01 | 2.0 | 6,000 | 0.051 | 0.068 |
| SHD | 0.001 | 2.0 | 50,000 | 0.223 | 0.084 |
| DVS Gesture | 0.001 | 2.0 | 50,000 | 0.259 | 0.056 |
| Dataset | Model | Resonant (%) | Mean | Std of (Hz) |
| sMNIST | HRF-Res | |||
| LIF-Res | ||||
| FordA | HRF-Res | |||
| LIF-Res | ||||
| SHD | HRF-Res | |||
| LIF-Res |
| FordA | sMNIST | SHD | DVS Gesture | |||||
| HRF-Res | LIF-Res | HRF-Res | LIF-Res | HRF-Res | LIF-Res | HRF-Res | LIF-Res | |
| 100 | ||||||||
| 200 | ||||||||
| 500 | – | – | ||||||
| 1000 | – | – | ||||||
| Full | ||||||||
| FordA | sMNIST | SHD | DVS Gesture | |||||
| Washout | HRF-Res | LIF-Res | HRF-Res | LIF-Res | HRF-Res | LIF-Res | HRF-Res | LIF-Res |
| 0% | .0399 | .0078 | .2708 | .2144 | .2143 | .1836 | .3509 | .2835 |
| 10% | .0414 | .0084 | .2707 | .2144 | .2145 | .1829 | .3509 | .2832 |
| 25% | .0365 | .0086 | .2723 | .2155 | .2143 | .1832 | .3509 | .2825 |
| 50% | .0301 | .0069 | .2720 | .2200 | .2142 | .1881 | .3507 | .2819 |
| FordA | sMNIST | |||
| HRF-Res | LIF-Res | HRF-Res | LIF-Res | |
| 0.00 | ||||
| 0.05 | ||||
| 0.10 | ||||
| 0.20 | ||||
| 0.30 | ||||
| FordA | sMNIST | |||
| Rate | HRF-Res | LIF-Res | HRF-Res | LIF-Res |
| 0.70 | ||||
| 0.80 | ||||
| 0.90 | ||||
| 1.00 | ||||
| 1.10 | ||||
Reservoir Computing
Reservoir computing uses recurrent dynamical systems to transform temporal inputs into features that support efficient learning with simple readouts.
See all 110 papers