cs.LGOct 28, 2026

Data Amount Heterogeneity Improves Performance in Federated Learning for Neuroimaging

Authors: Paul Kurian, Tamoghna Chattopadhyay, Abhijith Shaji, Greg Ver Steeg, Paul M. Thompson, Jose Luis Ambite

Organizations: Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA · Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA · University of California, Riverside, CA, USA

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) allows for secure analysis of distributed data without data sharing. We and others have successfully applied FL to neuroimaging tasks, such as Alzheimer's disease classification from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). FL trains a deep learning model locally at each site, encrypts the local model parameters and sends them to a federation controller that aggregates the local models under homomorphic encryption, the resulting community model is sent back to the sites for further training, and the process repeats for a number of rounds. FL often achieves learning performance (e.g., accuracy) close to centralized training, but no data leaves the sites and model parameters are protected through encryption and other measures. In this paper, we show that federations composed of sites with heterogeneous amounts of data (1 large site plus small sites) perform better than homogeneous (same data per site) federations, particularly in low data regimes, while reaching performance close to centralized training. Having a big site often results in faster convergence and higher final accuracy. Heterogeneous federations better exploit sites with small amounts of data, a common situation in large consortia such as ENIGMA.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

May 9, 2026

Evaluating Federated Learning approaches for mammography under breast density heterogeneity

Breast density is a key factor that influences mammography interpretation and is a major source of heterogeneity in multicenter datasets. Such heterogeneity poses challenges for collaborative machine learning across institutions, particularly in Federated Learning. This study aims to evaluate the impact of breast density-induced heterogeneity on FL for mammography image classification and to assess the robustness of common FL algorithms in realistic clinical settings. We conducted experiments under two scenarios: (1) a strongly heterogeneous setting where each participating site contributed exclusively low- or high-density cases, based on the BI-RADS density score, and (2) a population-based setting simulating breast density distributions in White and Asian populations. For the strongly heterogeneous setting, we evaluated two configurations: one with 2 clients, where the cases were grouped as BI-RADS A-B and C-D, and one with 4 clients, where each site contained cases of a single BI-RADS density. We compared three FL methods (FedAvg, FedProx, SCAFFOLD) against centralized training, local-only training, and naive aggregation approaches, including ensembling and weight averaging. Across both scenarios, FL achieved performance comparable to centralized training, while local models and naive aggregation approaches underperformed in the presence of strong heterogeneity. Notably, FedAvg achieved accuracy on par with or exceeding centralized training, demonstrating resilience to breast density-induced data imbalance without requiring specialized heterogeneity mitigation algorithms. These findings show that FL can address breast density-related heterogeneity, supporting its feasibility for real-world mammography workflows. The demonstrated robustness of FedAvg underscores the potential for broad clinical deployment of FL, enabling collaborative model development while maintaining data privacy.
May 15, 2026

Centralized vs Decentralized Federated Learning: A trade-off performance analysis

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for collaborative model training across distributed edge devices while preserving data privacy especially with the huge increase amount of data due to the adoption of technologies which contributes to the growing number of IoT devices. Storing this amount of data centrally is challenging due to issues like limited communication, privacy, and regulations. FL can be Centralized (CFL), Decentralized (DFL), and Semi-decentralized (SDFL). Choosing the right FL architecture depends on the application's needs. However, very few research studies have experimentally compared these three types of architectures to not only understand the respective strengths and limitations, but also trade-offs between different performance indicators. This paper overcome this lack of analysis, conducting experimental analyses using the Fedstellar simulator, MNIST dataset, and MLP classifier.
Sep 23, 2026

A generalizable structural brain MRI foundation model via dual-priority federated pretraining

Foundation models hold promise for generalizable analysis of structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans across diverse populations and imaging conditions. However, existing models typically rely on centralized pretraining using data pooled across cohorts, which is constrained by privacy and data-governance requirements. Moreover, larger cohorts can dominate optimization, underutilizing anatomical information from smaller cohorts and limiting generalization. Here we present BrainFedFM, a structural brain MRI foundation model federatively pretrained on 164,707 three-dimensional scans drawn from diverse real-world data distributions and organized across 42 federated sites. BrainFedFM uses dual-priority federated pretraining, in which spatial-priority masking emphasizes informative anatomical regions during local training, while site-priority aggregation adaptively weights contributions during global aggregation. Across 20 downstream datasets spanning 17 classification, regression and segmentation tasks, BrainFedFM achieved the state-of-the-art performance across seven foundation models, including four centralized models, while showing consistent advantages in classification and regression tasks and strong robustness under underrepresented populations and challenging imaging conditions. These findings demonstrate the generalizability of BrainFedFM and highlight federated pretraining as a practical strategy for developing neuroimaging foundation models from distributed data without pooling raw images.