Blind Video Denoising for Vocal Tract rtMRI using a Self-Supervised Ensemble
Organizations: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany · Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany · Technische Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany
Abstract
Real-time magnetic resonance imaging of the vocal tract makes speech articulation directly observable, but the trade-off between temporal resolution and signal quality introduces substantial noise and obscures fine articulatory detail. Since clean references cannot be acquired for a moving vocal tract, supervised denoising approaches are not applicable in this setting. We propose a self-supervised denoising framework that combines spatiotemporal super-resolution learning with pseudo-supervision derived from a variance-stabilized non-local means filter. A dual-model fusion strategy balances noise suppression and preservation of high-frequency articulatory structure. Experiments on the USC-75 multi-speaker dataset under natural noise conditions show that the ensemble raises the signal-to-noise ratio by 11.9 dB on unseen subjects while attaining more high-frequency articulatory content in the frames. Among tuned implementations of anisotropic diffusion, block-matching filtering, non-local means and pre-smoothed non-local means, every configuration that achieves comparable noise suppression does so at the cost of high-frequency content or of structural fidelity. Under severe added Gaussian, Rayleigh and Rician noise, peak signal-to-noise ratio improves by 7.6 to 11.8 dB and structural similarity roughly triples. An ablation shows that the variance-stabilized pseudo-supervision is an essential element for denoising, and that the effect is attributable to the hard thresholding contained in the stabilization transform.
Figures & tables
| Method | rSNR | TV | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original (noisy) | 21.5 2.4 | 9.32 0.99 | 1.00 0.00 |
| ADF | 28.2 4.6 | 8.98 0.94 | 0.89 0.02 |
| BM4D (3-D) | 26.7 4.1 | 7.05 0.64 | 0.92 0.02 |
| NLM (3-D) | 31.6 5.9 | 8.31 0.71 | 0.95 0.04 |
| PSNLM T [pseudo-target] | 35.7 9.7 | 9.96 1.12 | 0.57 0.04 |
| PSNLM T [max rSNR] | 40.0 9.9 | 5.81 0.70 | 0.64 0.04 |
| Pseudo-target | rSNR | SSIM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noisy input | 22.4 | n/a | 1.00 |
| None (raw noisy clip) | 22.3 | 0.97 | |
| Anscombe root only | 22.7 | 0.88 | |
| , Rician VST | 28.9 | 0.92 | |
| Threshold only | 33.0 | 0.88 | |
| (threshold root) | 35.6 | 0.86 |
Image Restoration
Image restoration uses computational methods to recover useful visual content from noisy, blurred, low-resolution, or otherwise degraded images.
See all 375 papers