Organizations: the School of Computer Science, Northwest University, Shaanxi, China · the School of Electronic Information, Northwest University, Shaanxi, China · the School of Art, Northwest University, Shaanxi, China
Radiology report generation (RRG) streamlines clinical workflows and alleviates the burden of radiologists' documentation. Standard vision-language models capture global visual cues and lack fine-grained alignment between anatomical regions and diagnostic text. Most retrieval-augmented methods retrieve complete historical reports, introducing redundant noise and severe vision-text mismatches that trigger clinically risky hallucinations and missed lesions. In this paper, we introduce AR-RRG, an anatomy-guided retrieval-driven method for the generation of radiology reports. AR-RRG consists of two core modules: the anatomy-aware self-training lesion detection network (ASLDNet) and the retrieval-driven radiology report generation (RRRG). ASLDNet leverages anatomy-aware spatial verification (ASV) and class-adaptive dynamic thresholding (CDT) via self-training, delivering accurate lesion localization to support subsequent generation. As the generative branch of AR-RRG, RRRG eliminates clinical hallucinations through dual-granularity retrieval (DR) and complements missing lesions with a neighborhood consensus (NC) mechanism. A parallel continuous visual perception (PCVP) stream converts radiographs into visual tokens through fixed medical encoding and resampling. Multi-scale text and visual features are fused, followed by LoRA-efficient large language model tuning to generate clinically consistent, visually grounded radiology reports. Extensive evaluations on MS-CXR, MIMIC-CXR, and IU X-Ray demonstrate that AR-RRG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across mainstream metrics. Our code will be made publicly available.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: (a) Per-Class Confidence Distributions. (b) Scatter plot of confidence versus IoU. The yellow area denotes valid lesions filtered out by low confidence, and the red area corresponds to high-confidence false positives. (c) Detection errors. Colored areas mark valid anatomical regions; red dashed boxes show predictions.
Fig. 2: The overall framework of our proposed AR-RRG.
TABLE V: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on MIMIC-CXR dataset. “-” denotes that the original paper did not report relevant results.
Method
Micro-F1 14
Micro-F1 5
Macro-F1 14
Macro-F1 5
F1-RG
B-1
B-4
RG-L
CEMRAG [ 5 ]
0.498
0.526
0.314
0.443
0.187
0.297
0.061
0.201
ASLDNet (Detection Only)
0.543
0.706
0.163
0.382
0.139
0.269
0.036
0.169
+ Template Retrieval
0.548
0.708
0.172
0.397
0.145
0.271
0.040
0.175
+ Template & Phrase Retrieval
0.526
0.667
0.185
0.386
0.221
0.359
0.078
0.216
+ Template & Phrase + NC
0.582
0.699
0.250
0.478
0.226
0.344
0.074
0.219
AR-RRG (Full)
0.630
0.744
0.348
0.582
0.352
0.425
0.152
0.322
TABLE VI: Ablation studies on MIMIC-CXR. Each subsequent row accumulates all previous components: Detection Only → +Template Retrieval → +Phrase Retrieval → +Neighborhood Consensus (NC). The full model further adds PCVP and LoRA fine-tuning. CEMRAG [ 5 ] is shown as a reference. Best results are in bold .
Label
Δ TP
Δ FP
Precision
Pleural Effusion
+422
+186
69.4%
Support Devices
+294
+167
63.8%
Lung Opacity
+154
+80
65.8%
Edema
+129
+102
55.8%
Cardiomegaly
+62
+66
48.4%
Consolidation
+11
+33
25.0%
TABLE VII: Per-label changes in true positives (TPs) and false positives (FPs) introduced by the Neighborhood Consensus (NC) module on MIMIC-CXR. Δ TP and Δ FP denote the changes after adding NC. Recovery precision is defined as Δ TP/( Δ TP+ Δ FP). “-” indicates that ΔTP+ΔFP≤0 , for which recovery precision is undefined. The Total row reports the sums of Δ TP and Δ FP across all labels.
Method
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
MTR
RG-L
R2Gen
0.470
0.304
0.219
0.165
0.187
0.371
CMCL
0.473
0.305
0.217
0.162
0.186
0.378
KM-GSK
0.496
0.327
0.238
0.178
-
0.381
CPLIAT
0.479
0.301
0.213
0.155
0.195
0.363
DCL
-
-
-
0.163
0.193
0.383
R2GenGPT
0.488
0.316
0.228
0.173
0.211
0.377
TABLE VIII: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on the IU X-Ray dataset. Methods marked with ∗ are evaluated in a zero-shot cross-domain setting (trained on MIMIC-CXR only); all remaining methods are fine-tuned on IU X-Ray.
Fig. 3: Qualitative comparison of lesion detection results on MS-CXR across eight pathology categories. Green boxes denote ground truth; colored boxes denote predictions from different methods.
Fig. 4: Qualitative comparison of report generation on a representative MIMIC-CXR case. The progression from Vision-Only to AR-RRG (Full) demonstrates the effectiveness of each module: detection guidance reduces hallucinations, dual-granularity retrieval improves localization, and neighborhood consensus recovers missing device information. The final model achieves high clinical fidelity with visual feature fine-tuning. Color coding indicates incorrect (red), partially accurate (purple), and accurate (green) content.
Radiology reports are essential for diagnostic reasoning and patient care, yet their manual preparation is time-consuming and cognitively demanding. Automatic radiology report generation (RRG) offers a scalable alternative, but existing models often produce lengthy, unstructured narratives that overlook diagnostic cues and multi-view information. We present Clinical-Knowledge Guided Disease-aware Visual-Textual Alignment for QA-Style Radiology Report Generation (CliQ-RRG), a unified two-stage framework for interpretable and clinically grounded reporting. In Stage 1, CliQ-RRG employs a Disease-aware Visual-Textual Alignment module that aligns image and text representations using predicted disease embeddings, reinforced by a Prior-Guided Attention Module (PrAM) to capture multi-view dependencies across current and prior scans. In Stage 2, GraphRAG-guided retrieval augments intermediate textual representations with graph-grounded clinical evidence, and a large language model restructures them into concise, interpretable question-answer (QA) pairs with diagnostic summaries. Experiments on two public chest X-ray benchmarks demonstrate that CliQ-RRG consistently outperforms prior methods across both lexical and clinical metrics, generating accurate and clinically coherent QA-style radiology reports. Code is available at: https://github.com/chandravardhan-singh-raghaw/CliQ-RRG.
Radiology report generation (RRG) has attracted significant attention due to its potential to reduce the workload of radiologists. The performance of current RRG approaches remains unsatisfactory against clinical standards. This paper introduces a novel RRG method, MLLM-RRG, that integrates multimodal large language models (MLLMs) with various types of clinical knowledge to generate accurate and comprehensive chest X-ray reports. Our method first designs a referring anatomical feature extractor that leverages anatomical knowledge to analyze different regions of the chest X-ray image and extract visual features without explicitly detecting regions. Next, based on the MLLM's decoder, we develop a multimodal report generator that leverages multimodal prompts constructed from dedicated visual features and textual instructions to produce the radiology report in an auto-regressive way. Finally, we introduce a disease-oriented clinical classification and alignment scheme in a multi-task learning manner to leverage disease knowledge to better preserve the clinical relevance among the generated reports. Once the model is trained, we also introduce a novel clinical quality reinforcement learning strategy to enhance the MLLM with report knowledge, further refining the tones of the generated reports towards radiologists. Extensive experiments on the MIMIC-CXR and IU X-Ray datasets demonstrate the superiority of our method over the state of the art. Our codes will be available at https://github.com/viscom-tongji/MLLM-RRG.
Miaojing Shi, Tianyu Cen, Zijie Yue +3
College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Reliable end-to-end clinical report generation has been a longstanding goal of medical ML research. The end goal for this process is to alleviate radiologists' workloads and provide second opinions to clinicians or patients. Thus, a necessary prerequisite for report generation models is a strong general performance and some type of innate grounding capability, to convince clinicians or patients of the veracity of the generated reports. In this paper, we present ASaRG (Automatic Segmentation-assisted Report Generation), an extension of the popular LLaVA architecture that aims to tackle both of these problems. ASaRG proposes to fuse intermediate features and fine-grained segmentation maps created by specialist radiological models into LLaVA's multi-modal projection layer via simple concatenation. With a small number of added parameters, our approach achieves a +0.89% performance gain (p=0.012) in CE F1 score compared to the LLaVA baseline when using only intermediate features, and +2.77% performance gain (p<0.001) when adding a combination of intermediate features and fine-grained segmentation maps. Compared with COMG and ORID, two other report generation methods that utilize segmentations, the performance gain amounts to 6.98% and 6.28% in F1 score, respectively. ASaRG is not mutually exclusive with other changes made to the LLaVA architecture, potentially allowing our method to be combined with other advances in the field. Finally, the use of an arbitrary number of segmentations as part of the input demonstrably allows tracing elements of the report to the corresponding segmentation maps and verifying the groundedness of assessments. Our code will be made publicly available at a later date.
Frederic Jonske, Constantin Seibold, Osman Alperen Koras +6
Institute for AI in Medicine, University Medicine Essen Girardetstraße 2, 45131 Essen, Germany