Vision-language-action (VLA) models can generate task-oriented robot actions, but they do not guarantee safe execution in obstacle-rich manipulation scenes. Although CBF-QP safety filters can locally project unsafe actions into a safe set, such correction may push the robot away from the learned task trajectory and leave the VLA policy without a reliable recovery direction. We propose Route-Guided CBF-QP Repair, a post-hoc repair module that uses the short-horizon action chunk predicted by the VLA to detect blocked nominal trajectories and generate entry-exit-rejoin guidance around obstacles. The selected route is added to the CBF-QP objective as a soft guidance term, while the CBF safety constraint remains hard. On SafeLIBERO, our method improves collision avoidance, task success, and SafeSuccess compared with AEGIS. Our project page is available at GitHub.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Overview of Route-Guided CBF-QP Repair. The method uses the VLA action chunk to estimate a nominal future trajectory and detect obstacle-induced blockage. When the nominal trajectory is blocked, it generates an entry-exit-rejoin route around the obstacle and adds the selected route to the CBF-QP objective as soft guidance. The CBF constraint remains hard, so the repaired action preserves safety while following a recoverable route toward task completion.
Fig. 2: Qualitative comparison on SafeLIBERO. Task : pick up the chocolate pudding and place it in the basket. Top row : AEGIS (Success, Collision). Bottom row : Ours (Success, Collision-free).
Method
Metric
SafeLIBERO Suite
Average
Spatial
Goal
Object
Long
AEGIS
CAR ↑ (%)
63.75
83.75
56.25
55.00
64.69
TSR ↑ (%)
60.00
85.00
67.50
38.75
62.81
SafeSuccess ↑ (%)
52.50
73.75
41.25
21.25
47.19
ETS ↓
85.61
104.33
67.68
181.85
109.87
Route-Guided CBF-QP (Ours)
CAR ↑ (%)
66.25
81.25
76.25
52.50
69.06
TABLE I: Quantitative results on the SafeLIBERO benchmark.
Components
Average Performance
Path
Gate
Score
Rejoin
CAR (%)
TSR (%)
SafeSucc. (%)
ETS
×
×
×
×
64.69
62.81
47.19
109.87
✓
✓
✓
×
67.12
63.95
47.92
112.50
✓
✓
×
✓
65.88
63.10
48.15
114.12
✓
✓
✓
✓
69.06
65.00
49.69
118.45
TABLE II: Ablation study of route-guided CBF-QP components.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated impressive end-to-end performance across a variety of robotic manipulation tasks. However, these policies offer no guarantees against collisions with task-irrelevant objects in the scene. Existing safety filters sidestep this problem by querying a vision-language model (VLM) to identify obstacles and their locations. This, however, is too slow to run in the control loop and can only be invoked at episode initialization, leaving the filter unable to track moving obstacles. We discover that a small number of attention heads within a VLA model reliably localize the object the policy intends to approach. These heads can be exploited within a training-free safety framework that obtains the active target from the attention heads at every step, treats the remainder of the scene as obstacles, and feeds these into a Control Barrier Function (CBF) filter. Together with a lightweight real-time object tracker, this allows for collision avoidance for non-static obstacles. We evaluate our framework on SafeLIBERO, which we extend with moving obstacles. On the original static benchmark, our method performs comparably to an oracle that uses privileged simulator state to identify the target, emulating a VLM-based identification step run once at episode initialization. On the dynamic variant, where the oracle's init-time target assignment becomes stale, our method substantially outperforms it by 43%, on average. Our findings suggest that the perceptual signals needed for real-time safety filtering are already present within VLA policies and can be exploited without additional training or heavy auxiliary models.
Seongbin Park, Fan Zhang, Baharan Mirzasoleiman +2
University of California Los Angeles United States
Recent vision-language-action (VLA) models are promising for general-purpose manipulation, but long-horizon execution remains fragile. Small state-estimation or control errors can lead to irreversible failures (e.g., collisions and object drops). Avoiding these risks requires a proactive safety mechanism capable of anticipating hazards. In this paper, we introduce SafeLoop, a non-invasive external wrapper that adds hazard prediction and rollback-based recovery to a VLA model without changing its parameters. SafeLoop trains a risk predictor from vision and proprioception to output four values: the probability and time-to-hazard for body collisions and for object failures. A lightweight controller then chooses one of three actions based on the predicted risk: continue execution (noop), save a safety checkpoint (record), or retreat in joint space (rollback). Rollback moves the robot back to a recent safe waypoint and queries the base policy again, which may yield an alternative continuation. Across 24 LIBERO tasks (16 random seeds each) and three real-robot tasks (25 rollouts each), SafeLoop achieves a stronger overall safety-success trade-off than alternative methods, reducing hazard cases by roughly 70% while preserving task success and the base-policy control rate. Project code is available at https://github.com/Loule0-0/SafeLoop/tree/release/safeloop.
Zeyu Lou, Tianran Zhang, Xinquan Yue +2
Nanjing University, Nanjing, China · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangdong, China · Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
Vision-language-action (VLA) models enable increasingly general-purpose robotic manipulation, but such learned policies do not provide safety guarantees for collision avoidance---especially in environments outside of training distributions. This work presents Vision-Language-Poisson-Safe Actions (VLPSA), a safety filtering framework that provides full-body safety for VLA policies in cluttered and dynamic environments without retraining. VLPSA synthesizes Poisson Safety Functions (PSF) online from perception data, yielding a Control Barrier Function (CBF) that is enforced through a CBF-QP safety filter over the full body and any grasped object, treated as an extension of the final robot link. To enable real-time deployment while maintaining fine spatial resolution in critical task regions, VLPSA combines dual resolutions of this PSF using Boolean CBF compositions. We evaluate VLPSA on SafeLIBERO against safety-filtering baselines, where it achieves the highest collision avoidance rate among the evaluated methods, increasing collision avoidance from 23.1% for the base π0.5 policy to 91.2% while surpassing its task success rate. We further deploy VLPSA on a Franka FR3 in cluttered scenes with dynamic obstacles and human interference, demonstrating real-time full-body safety during manipulation tasks.
Meg Wilkinson, Emily Fourney, Joel W. Burdick +1
Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA