Harness-S: Learning from Sibling Harnesses for Generalizable Agent Training

Language-model agents are increasingly deployed through diverse harnesses that differ in system prompts, tool schemas, control loops, and trajectory formats. The same model can perform unevenly across these interfaces, making robustness to harness variation an important objective. A natural approach is to train a shared policy through multiple harnesses, but doing so introduces a scheduling problem: each training step should favor a harness that currently provides a useful learning signal while also producing an update that benefits the other harnesses. We develop HarnessBandit, an online scheduler that selects one harness per optimizer step. After a group-relative policy optimization (GRPO) update, it observes learnability -- the mean absolute advantage on the batch -- and transferability -- the cosine between a low-dimensional gradient sketch of the current harness and exponential moving averages of the remaining harnesses. The two signals are fused after pooled sliding-window min-max normalization and sampled with a visit-dependent bonus and an explicit exploration floor. We train Qwen3.5-2B across six harnesses on ClawGym and evaluate on PinchBench (held-out tasks, in-distribution OpenClaw) and ClawEval (held-out tasks and harness). HarnessBandit improves over mixed-batch multi-harness training on both benchmarks, while training diagnostics indicate that learnability and transferability provide distinct, evolving signals.

Large language model agents increasingly solve long-horizon tasks through multi-agent harnesses in which a central agent coordinates specialized sub-agents, tools, and environments. Training the central policy in such a harness raises two challenges. First, an action label is a low-cardinality decision, whereas its args form a high-dimensional conditional sequence; optimizing both with a shared sequence-level signal can produce conflicting gradients. Second, dynamic scheduling creates interdependent sessions with branches, parallel calls, and rewritten contexts, which cannot be faithfully reduced to one flat token sequence. We introduce Harness-RL, a structured reinforcement learning framework that combines Conflict-Aware Policy Optimization (CAPO) with interface-level black-box trajectory construction. The black-box component captures Interface Call Records, builds per-session prefix trees, and aligns outcome and process rewards with trainable tokens. CAPO uses forward activations to identify parameter partitions associated with action and args tokens, then routes their policy gradients to the corresponding subspaces. Harness-RL supports both central-only and joint multi-agent training. Across seven multi-hop question answering and agentic retrieval benchmarks, it reaches average F1 scores of 42.93 and 47.79 with Qwen2.5-1.5B and Qwen2.5-3B, respectively, while ablations validate the contribution of CAPO and favor central-only optimization in the evaluated setting. Our code is available at https://github.com/jiangxinke/Harness-RL.

Automating the search for effective harnesses is an important step toward enabling agents to recursively self-improve. Existing harness optimizations typically produce a single global harness that is applied uniformly across task instances. However, a harness that works well on average may not be optimal for every instance. We introduce Turbo Harness, a framework that can adapt a globally optimized harness to each instance by reusing information generated during the original optimization process. Specifically, Turbo Harness recycles artifacts produced during a completed global harness optimization run, and summarizes them into a structured playbook. We train a harness editor to leverage this prior optimization experience to generate instance-specific patches to the global harness. At inference time, the editor uses the instance and the playbook to construct a tailored harness in which the execution model operates. Through numerical experiments, we show that Turbo Harness consistently outperforms existing harness optimization baselines across seven benchmarks spanning interactive agent tasks, software engineering, and long-horizon terminal tasks.