ALTO: African and Levantine Tech-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence Corpus

The development of robust hate speech detection systems remains limited by the lack of large-scale, fine-grained training data, especially for languages beyond English. Existing corpora typically rely on simplistic toxic and non-toxic labels, and the few that capture hate directed at specific minority groups lack the positive counterexamples required to distinguish genuine hate from mere discussion. In this work, we introduce ToxSyn-PT, the first Portuguese large-scale corpus explicitly designed for multi-label hate speech detection across nine protected minority groups, including the non-toxic counterexamples absent in all other public datasets. Generated via a controllable four-stage pipeline, ToxSyn contains discourse-type annotations to capture rhetorical strategies of toxic/non-toxic language, such as sarcasm, dehumanization, and cultural appreciation. Our experiments reveal a catastrophic, mutual generalization failure compared to existing datasets from social-media domains: models trained on social media struggle to generalize to minority-specific contexts, and vice-versa. This finding indicates they are distinct tasks and exposes summary metrics like Macro F1 can be unreliable indicators of true model behavior, as they completely mask model failure. We publicly release ToxSyn on HuggingFace to support reproducible research on synthetic data generation and benchmark progress in hate-speech detection for low- and mid-resource languages.

Research on gender-related online content is often operationalized through harm-centered tasks that collapse non-harmful gender-related and unrelated content, while existing datasets remain concentrated in high-resource languages and Global North settings. To bridge these gaps, we introduce GENDIS, a dataset of 9,600 multilingual, human-annotated YouTube comments from India, Kenya, and Nigeria (3,200 per country), annotated using a two-level framework that first identifies whether gender is referenced and then classifies gender-related content as negative, positive, or neutral. This separation provides a denominator for gender-related discourse independent of harm, enabling both prevalence estimation and characterization of its evaluative range. In the uniform random stratum, 23.8-35.0% of comments are gender-related, and among those with a resolved stance, 82% are neutral or positive. Across models, gender-reference detection is substantially easier than stance classification, especially for positive and neutral speech. Lightly supervised classifiers match frontier zero-shot large language models at substantially lower cost and outperform generic toxicity detection, while cross-country transfer remains limited. GENDIS provides a locally grounded resource for measuring when gender is invoked online and how that reference is framed.

Gender based hate speech research in Bengali has focused almost exclusively on misogyny, leaving anti male hate, or misandry, entirely unstudied for this language and creating a systematic blind spot in moderation systems trained to catch attacks on women but not on men. We introduce Ben-Misandry, the first Bengali misandry detection dataset: 5,000 comments across six taxonomy classes, including a novel category for mocking male emotional vulnerability with no direct analogue in existing misogyny taxonomies. The corpus is taxonomy-controlled synthetic data generated with GPT-4.1, spot-checked by four human reviewers on a 500-comment sample who confirmed the large majority of assigned labels; a full inter-annotator- agreement study is left to future work. We benchmark it with a classical pipeline (seven classifiers over four text representations) and a transformer pipeline (BanglaBERT, XLM-RoBERTa, and two fusion strategies). The best classical model, a linear SVM over character-level TF-IDF, reaches 91.8% accuracy; a late fusion ensemble averaging BanglaBERT and XLM-RoBERTa softmax outputs reaches 96.6% accuracy and macro ROC-AUC above 99%, nominally ahead of every single model and early fusion, though we have not run significance testing to confirm these margins are meaningful. We relate this to classifier combination theory, under which averaging encoders with decorrelated errors is expected to reduce variance, and corroborate the decision boundary with Shapley explanations that recover the same class- discriminative vocabulary found in our exploratory analysis, while noting this cannot rule out the model partly keying on synthetic-generation artifacts. Our results indicate misandry detection in Bengali is feasible and measurable on this synthetic corpus, offered as an initial public resource pending validation on real-world data.