For robots to operate reliably in commercial and industrial applications, they must persistently perform specific tasks with known variations in object shape and pose. We call this Variational Automation (VA) to differentiate these settings from fixed automation. Inspired by recent papers on Agentic Robotics, where pretrained LLM and VLM coding agents combine interpretable robot programming with the open-world adaptability of model free policies, we propose a general set of agentic robotics benchmark design criteria that includes accessibility, repeatability, diversity, relevance to agentic robotics and practical applications, physical realizability, resistance to benchmark saturation, and computational efficiency. We instantiate these principles in six manipulation task classes spanning industrial, medical, and infrastructure applications: tool sorting, tool hanging, gear meshing, syringe packing, cable insertion, and cable routing. We introduce the Variational Automation Benchmark for Agentic Robotics (VABAR), an open, easily replicable, simulation-based manipulation benchmark to systematically evaluating agentic robotics systems. Built fully on open-source tools, VABAR features detailed implementations using the Newton physics engine, standardized task variations, difficulty tiers, success metrics, and a library of 33 generalizable skills with human-authored programmatic reference solutions. We provide initial baseline evaluations using an open agentic manipulation harness, Graph-as-Policy (GaP), and Isaac Lab Arena.
Figures & tables
Fig. 2 : Overview of the VABAR evaluation framework. Left: Tasks are specified by initial and goal configurations, an asset library, and robot definitions. Top right: Admissible task variations span objects, arrangements, and positions, with examples at two levels. Bottom right: Robot policies are evaluated across diverse manipulation tasks, including object sorting, tool hanging, gear assembly, insertion, and cable routing.
Fig. 3 : Diagnostic execution flow. VABAR records observations and estimated state, system actions, resulting physics states and contacts, and verification outcomes. Dashed boxes denote privileged simulator state and dotted box denote the physics object contact information used for diagnosis.
Fig. 4 : VABAR skill library. The 33 skills span perception, grasping, motion planning and execution, and verification. Colored cards marked “+” identify 25 added skill bundles relative to the May Graph-as-Policy library; white cards denote eight retained counterparts. Additions support functional-feature manipulation, constrained placement, cable handling, and execution checks.
Task
Level 1
Level 2
1 TS
Singulated tools; no distractors
Cluttered tools
2 TH
One tool; known fixture pose
Multiple tools and fixture types; randomized poses
3 GM
Assemble two gears
Assemble three gears
4 SP
Singulated targets
Cluttered scenes
5 CI
Fixed, visible port; nearby connector with small misalignment
Randomized port pose; moderate connector misalignment
6 CR
2–3 widely spaced pegs; short route; low turning angle
TABLE II : Task performance comparison across VABAR tasks and difficulty levels.
Task
Difficulty
Perception
Grasp
Motion
(%)
(%)
(%)
Tool Sorting
Level 1
37.8
51.4
10.8
Level 2
56.4
28.7
14.9
Tool Hanging
Level 1
0.0
0.0
100.0
Level 2
21.4
28.6
50.0
Gear Meshing
Level 1
N/A
N/A
N/A
TABLE III : Failure modes across VABAR difficulty levels.
Fig. 5 : Example: Agent inspects Newton physics model to diagnose and fix failure due to syringes jamming inside disposal box . Left: simulated syringe-disposal scene with a top-down inset. Right: Netwon ground-truth front and side internal views of jammed episodes t01 and t29 . Red segments highlight syringes straddling the lid plane; blue segments show other syringes.
Recent advances in vision-language-action (VLA) and world-action models (WAMs) have significantly improved robotic manipulation, yet deploying robots in the open world demands a higher level of autonomy beyond executing predefined tasks. Robot agents offer a promising paradigm for this transition, integrating task discovery, contextual reasoning, physical execution, and adaptive recovery into a closed interaction loop. However, existing benchmarks largely evaluate isolated capabilities, failing to capture the complexity of open-world robot autonomy. We introduce RobotAgentBench (RAB), a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating robot agents in realistic, open-world household environments. Through an agent-assisted, human-in-the-loop real-to-sim pipeline, RAB constructs 50 diverse household layouts with interactive objects and physically grounded tasks, encompassing 90 atomic tasks, 18 short-horizon tasks, 8 long-horizon tasks, and 4 open-ended scenarios. RAB provides a multi-level evaluation of robot agent capabilities: (1) task-level assessments systematically examine five complementary dimensions: task discovery, context reasoning, manipulation, failure recovery, and robustness; (2) scenario-level evaluation assesses how agents integrate these capabilities to autonomously fulfill high-level user needs. Furthermore, RAB enables systematic comparisons of standalone VLA/WAM models and diverse robot agent architectures under a unified planning-execution-verification framework. Extensive experiments reveal substantial gaps between manipulation and autonomy, demonstrate the advantages of agentic architectures and recursive self-improvement, and highlight the remaining challenges toward open-world robot autonomy.
Lingjun Mao, Jinglin Cao, Lukun He +22
Aether AI · University of California San Diego · University of California Davis
Improvements in multi-modal capabilities have enabled agents to act directly as robot policies, a setting we refer to as agentic robot control (ARC). We introduce RoboARCade, a benchmark of long-horizon manipulation tasks across three embodiments designed to test in-context adaptation, memory, and reasoning for precise control. The tasks build on existing open-source benchmarks, which we make harder by widening the range of initial conditions. RoboARCade is easy to use and extend: all tasks run on a single simulation backend, MuJoCo, each task is a self-contained data pack, and agents connect through interchangeable interfaces, so new tasks, agents, and interfaces can be added independently. The benchmark separates leading agents: GPT-6 Astra achieves 49.8% compared with 43.6% for Claude Fable 5.1, leaving substantial room for improvement. Comparing two interfaces, we find that a richer visual interface adds only 1.5 to 6.8 points at 1.7 to 2.3 times the cost. Failures stem mostly from choosing a poor manipulation strategy or executing a good one imprecisely, rarely from misunderstanding the scene, and agents incorrectly claim success on 24% to 39% of attempted subtasks. Agents can also improve without human input: one successful demonstration in context raises Astra's score from 53.5% to 73.0% on a five-task subset, and a prompt the agent writes and revises itself reaches 72.0%. Code, videos and full traces are available at roboarcade.org.
For robots to work reliably in commercial and industrial applications, recent advances in agentic coding systems have potential to combine interpretable robot programming with the open-world adaptability of model-free policies. We focus on "Variational Automation" (VA), a class of tasks that have larger variations in object geometry and pose than fixed automation. Model-free policies often struggle to close the reliability gap for VA tasks, which must be executed persistently and reliably in commercial and industrial applications. Motivated by prior work on Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) and the Robot Operating System (ROS), we introduce Graph-as-Policy (GaP), a multi-agent coding harness that generates directed computation graphs with perception, planning, and control nodes from a Modular Open Robot Skill Library (MORSL). GaP generates an internal simulation environment to rehearse task instances with different graphs in parallel to iteratively refine the graph structure and parameters to improve success rates and throughput. Evaluation with 8 new open VA task benchmarks, 4 in simulation and 4 in real-world, suggests that GaP can achieve success rates that significantly outperform baselines. Details, code, and data: https://graph-robots.github.io/gap
Kaiyuan Chen, Shuangyu Xie, Letian Fu +21
University of California, Berkeley · Carnegie Mellon University · Bosch +1