cs.CVNov 10, 2026

Medical Image Segmentation: Foundation Model Adaptation versus Task-Specific Training

Authors: Emre Kutlusan, Yongmin Li

Organizations: Department of Computer Science, Brunel University of London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom

Abstract

Foundation models pretrained on large natural-image collections are increasingly adapted for medical image segmentation, in the expectation that they will replace models trained for each task. Most comparisons, however, use data from the training distribution and a single task-specific baseline whose configuration is rarely justified, and therefore provide limited evidence of performance at new clinical sites. It also remains unclear how much of a foundation model must be adapted, and what determines this. We adapted a foundation model, DINOv2, with strategies ranging from tuning only its bias terms to full fine-tuning, and compared it with U-Nets and ResU-Nets trained from scratch. Experiments covered colonoscopy, breast ultrasound and dermoscopy, with testing on held-out data from the training source and on independent datasets from other institutions. The adapted foundation model generalised better on every external dataset. Within the training distribution, the task-specific models remained competitive when training data were abundant, and delineated boundaries more precisely, while the foundation model more often missed small lesions. Only a small fraction of the foundation model required adaptation, and the capacity needed was determined by the imaging domain rather than by the adaptation method. A widely used polyp test set was also found to duplicate images from another benchmark. Foundation-model adaptation is therefore warranted where models must work across sites, with capacity selected on the target domain.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Mar 15, 2026

Adaptation of Foundation Models in Medical Image Analysis: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Deployment Considerations

Foundation models, pretrained on diverse data, objectives, or modalities for reuse across downstream tasks, are increasingly applied to medical image analysis. Their performance depends not only on pretraining but also on how they are adapted to specific tasks, data regimes, and deployment settings. Whereas previous reviews have considered adaptation within broader syntheses, this review focuses specifically on post-pretraining interventions applied to existing FMs. Using a structured narrative review with a systematic, auditable workflow, we identified 719 eligible reports representing 705 independent studies. Of these, 473 provided controlled comparative evidence: 322 formally published studies formed the primary synthesis and 151 preprint-only studies a sensitivity layer. Adaptation was organized into five non-mutually exclusive families: parameter-level, representation-level, objective-level, data-centric, and architectural/sequence-level adaptation, with model use and update regime analyzed separately. Controlled comparisons showed no consistent ranking among frozen, parameter-efficient, partial, or full updating, or across broader adaptation families; outcomes varied by task, data regime, comparator, and evaluation setting. Clinical-readiness evidence remained limited: 173/705 studies (24.5%) had confirmed independent external validation, 10 (1.4%) reported calibration or uncertainty evidence, and 97/322 formally published comparative studies (30.1%) included a qualifying externally validated arm. Overall, FM adaptation is a context-dependent design space rather than a hierarchy of preferred strategies.
Oct 26, 2026

MedAdaptAgent: An Automatic Harness for Adapting Medical Imaging Models to New Sites

Reusing pretrained medical-imaging models offers an alternative to training from scratch. A model trained for the same task may perform poorly at a new hospital because imaging protocols and preprocessing differ. Effective adaptation depends on the model architecture, domain shift, and available labels and compute. Adaptation can improve scores on a small labeled set yet reduce performance on unseen data. We present MedAdaptAgent, an automatic harness that turns a supplied model, target data, and a free-text request into a new-site adaptation workflow. Its LLM-driven Adaptation Planner uses model-site evidence to choose compatible experiments and revise subsequent adjustments. The harness requires evidence of improvement over the pretrained model, then delivers the selected model as a complete, runnable package. Evaluation spans 26 segmentation and classification transfers across architectures and compute settings, with segmentation annotation budgets ranging from zero-shot transfer to few-shot adaptation. With 20 local annotations, mean segmentation Dice rises from 0.483 to 0.774 across 10 transfers, a 60.1% relative gain, with no harmful replacements. Mean classification AUROC rises from 0.810 to 0.837 across 13 transfers, a 3.4% relative gain. Comparing adapted models with the pretrained model reduces harmful classification replacements by 30.8% versus selecting the highest-scoring model on the available labels, using identical candidates. Seven public-model deployments demonstrate adaptation and reproducible package delivery across contrast and modality shifts. A CT-to-MRI study extends the evaluation to four LLM planners, including two open-weight models. We release the code on GitHub.
Mar 16, 2026

Spectral Rectification for Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of Foundation Models in Colonoscopy Depth Estimation

Accurate monocular depth estimation is critical in colonoscopy for lesion localization and navigation. Foundation models trained on natural images fail to generalize directly to colonoscopy. We identify the core issue not as a semantic gap, but as a statistical shift in the frequency domain: colonoscopy images lack the strong high-frequency edge and texture gradients that these models rely on for geometric reasoning. To address this, we propose SpecDepth, a parameter-efficient adaptation framework that preserves the robust geometric representations of the pre-trained models while adapting to the colonoscopy domain. Its key innovation is an adaptive spectral rectification module, which uses a learnable wavelet decomposition to explicitly model and amplify the attenuated high-frequency components in feature maps. Different from conventional fine-tuning that risks distorting high-level semantic features, this targeted, low-level adjustment realigns the input signal with the original inductive bias of the foundational model. On the public C3VD and SimCol3D datasets, SpecDepth achieved state-of-the-art performance with an absolute relative error of 0.022 and 0.027, respectively. Our work demonstrates that directly addressing spectral mismatches is a highly effective strategy for adapting vision foundation models to specialized medical imaging tasks. The code will be released publicly after the manuscript is accepted for publication.