Clustering
Overview
Clustering seeks useful groupings when labels are absent or incomplete, helping reveal structure in data such as text, images, graphs, time series, and scientific measurements. Methods include centroid-based k-means, density and hierarchical clustering, graph and spectral methods, mixture models, and newer approaches that learn embeddings or use optimal transport; fairness, privacy, streaming, and federated settings add further constraints. Work also studies how to choose the number of clusters and assess stability, uncertainty, interpretability, and statistical significance. No single method works best across data types: deep methods do not consistently beat strong conventional algorithms, and reliable validation remains a central challenge.
Latest papers
345 papers31 papers in the last four weeks, up 11% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.
Distributionally Robust K-Means Clustering
Beyond Statistical Co-occurrence: Unlocking Intrinsic Semantics for Tabular Data Clustering
Flu' and Cold' are often treated as symbolic tokens, causing conceptually related samples to be isolated. To bridge the gap between dataset-specific statistics and intrinsic semantic knowledge, this paper proposes Tabular-Augmented Contrastive Clustering (TagCC), a novel framework that anchors statistical tabular representations to open-world textual concepts. Specifically, TagCC utilizes Large Language Models (LLMs) to distill underlying data semantics into textual anchors via semantic-aware transformation. Through Contrastive Learning (CL), the framework enriches the statistical tabular representations with the open-world semantics encapsulated in these anchors. This CL framework is jointly optimized with a clustering objective, ensuring that the learned representations are both semantically coherent and clustering-friendly. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that TagCC significantly outperforms its counterparts.