Differentially Private Federated Learning

Overview

Differentially private federated learning studies how to train shared models across organizations or devices without exposing sensitive training data, using formal privacy guarantees to limit information revealed by the model or its updates. Common approaches clip and perturb gradients or client updates with calibrated noise, often alongside secure aggregation, privacy accounting, adaptive clipping, client selection, or parameter-efficient tuning such as LoRA. Work spans medical imaging, language models, intrusion detection, and other tasks with non-IID client data, where utility is assessed against privacy budgets and sometimes membership-inference or poisoning attacks. The central tension is that stronger privacy can reduce accuracy—especially for heterogeneous or rare data—while robustness, fairness, communication costs, and the precise scope of each privacy guarantee also need to be addressed together.

Latest papers

65 papers5 papers in the last four weeks, down 55% on the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Feb 18, 2026

Towards Secure and Scalable Energy Theft Detection: A Federated Learning Approach for Resource-Constrained Smart Meters

Energy theft poses a significant threat to the stability and efficiency of smart grids, leading to substantial economic losses and operational challenges. Traditional centralized machine learning approaches for theft detection require aggregating user data, raising serious concerns about privacy and data security. These issues are further exacerbated in smart meter environments, where devices are often resource-constrained and lack the capacity to run heavy models. In this work, we propose a privacy-preserving federated learning framework for energy theft detection that addresses both privacy and computational constraints. Our approach leverages a lightweight multilayer perceptron (MLP) model, suitable for deployment on low-power smart meters, and integrates basic differential privacy (DP) by injecting Gaussian noise into local model updates before aggregation. This ensures formal privacy guarantees without compromising learning performance. We evaluate our framework on a real-world smart meter dataset under both IID and non-IID data distributions. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves competitive accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC scores while maintaining privacy and efficiency. This makes the proposed solution practical and scalable for secure energy theft detection in next-generation smart grid infrastructures.
Feb 6, 2026

An Adaptive Differentially Private Federated Learning Framework

Federated learning enables collaborative model training across distributed clients while preserving data privacy. However, in practical deployments, device heterogeneity and non-independent and identically distributed (Non-IID) data often lead to unstable and biased gradient. When differential privacy is enforced, conventional fixed gradient clipping and Gaussian noise injection may further amplify gradient perturbations, resulting in training oscillation and degraded model performance. To address these challenges, we propose an adaptive differentially private federated learning framework that explicitly targets model efficiency under heterogeneous and privacy-constrained settings. On the client side, a lightweight local dimensionality reduction module is introduced to learn reduced-dimensional intermediate representations and produce more structured gradients during backpropagation, thereby mitigating noise amplification during local optimization. On the server side, an adaptive gradient clipping strategy dynamically adjusts clipping thresholds based on historical update statistics to avoid over-clipping and noise domination. Furthermore, a constraint-aware robust aggregation mechanism is designed to suppress unreliable or noise-dominated client updates and stabilize global optimization. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, SVHN, and STL-10 demonstrate that the proposed method consistently improves convergence stability and classification performance under differential privacy.
Nov 8, 2025

A Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Method for Heterogeneous Clients

Federated Learning (FL) with Differential Privacy (DP) can ensure the protection of healthcare data privacy against malicious user attacks. However, FL with the DP method faces an inherent trade-off: stronger privacy protection degrades predictive accuracy due to injected noise. On the other hand, Homomorphic Encryption (HE) enables computations on encrypted data and the aggregation of encrypted gradients without introducing DP-induced noise, thereby potentially increasing the predictive accuracy. However, it may increase the computation cost. To improve the predictive accuracy while considering the computational ability of heterogeneous clients, we propose a Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning (PPML)-Hybrid method. In the proposed PPML-Hybrid method, clients distributedly select either HE or DP based on their computational resources, so that HE clients contribute noise-free updates while DP clients reduce computational overhead. Meanwhile, clients with high computational resources can flexibly adopt HE or DP according to their privacy needs. Performance evaluation on omics datasets shows that our proposed method achieves comparable predictive accuracy while significantly reducing computation time relative to HE-only. Additionally, it outperforms DP-only methods under equivalent or stricter privacy budgets.
Oct 27, 2025

Differential Privacy as a Perk: Federated Learning over Multiple-Access Fading Channels with a Multi-Antenna Base Station

Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed learning paradigm that preserves privacy by eliminating the need to exchange raw data during training. In its prototypical edge instantiation with underlying wireless transmissions enabled by analog over-the-air computing (AirComp), referred to as over-the-air FL (AirFL), the inherent channel noise plays a unique role of frenemy in the sense that it degrades training due to noisy global aggregation while providing a natural source of randomness for privacy-preserving mechanisms, formally quantified by differential privacy (DP). It remains, nevertheless, challenging to effectively harness such channel impairments, as prior arts, under assumptions of either simple channel models or restricted types of loss functions, mostly considering (local) DP enhancement with a single-round or non-convergent bound on privacy loss. In this paper, we study AirFL over multiple-access fading channels with a multi-antenna base station (BS) subject to user-level DP requirements. Despite a recent study, which claimed in similar settings that artificial noise (AN) must be injected to ensure DP in general, we demonstrate, on the contrary, that DP can be gained as a perk even without employing any AN. Specifically, we derive a novel bound on DP that converges under general bounded-domain assumptions on model parameters, along with a convergence bound with general smooth and non-convex loss functions. Next, we optimize over receive beamforming and power allocations to characterize the optimal convergence-privacy trade-offs, which also reveal explicit conditions in which DP is achievable without compromising training. Finally, our theoretical findings are validated by extensive numerical results.
May 28, 2025

Inclusive Federated Learning Through Compliance-Weighted Noise Allocation in Healthcare AI

Background: Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training of clinical AI models without centralizing patient data, but adoption is limited by privacy concerns, heterogeneous institutional compliance, and resource disparities; standard differential privacy (DP) applies uniform noise to all clients, penalizing well-compliant or under-resourced institutions. Objective: We introduce a compliance-aware FL framework that adapts DP to institutional compliance, letting lower-compliance sites participate without uniformly penalizing others. Methods: A compliance scoring tool aligned with HIPAA, GDPR, NIST, ISO, and HL7/FHIR maps each client score to a per-step Gaussian noise scale for server-side DP-SGD on a small aggregator dataset. The formal (ε,δ)(ε,δ) bound applies to the aggregator dataset under a semi-honest aggregator; client-level DP needs secure aggregation (future work). We evaluate five FL strategies on PneumoniaMNIST and BreastMNIST (16 clients, 50 rounds, five seeds); the cumulative aggregator-dataset εε is about 1434 (Breast) and 513 (Pneumonia) at δ=10−5δ=10^{-5}. Results: Including 12 lower-compliance clients (Experiment 1) versus a compliant-only baseline (Experiment 4) changed BreastMNIST accuracy by +4.5 (FedAvg), +6.8 (FedMedian), +5.2 (FedProx), +1.6 (FedYogi), and -4.1 (FedAdam) percentage points (pooled +2.8 pp; not significant at n=5; up to +17 pp per configuration); compliance-weighted allocation matched uniform server-side DP at equal mean noise (+0.1 pp), carrying no utility penalty, and first-round noise cost 1.3 pp (Breast) and 2.5 pp (Pneumonia, FedAvg). Conclusions: Compliance-weighted server-side DP lets lower-compliance institutions join FL without degrading performance, giving auditable per-site noise control at no utility cost; formal guarantees apply to the aggregator dataset, with client-level DP requiring secure aggregation.