Expressivity

Recent momentum

+75%

14 papers in the last 28 days · 0.2% of indexed attention

Twelve weeks of publication activity for this topic as it is defined today.

Weekly history

Recent digests

What was published in this topic, kept on the site without email delivery.

Period ending 2026-09-21

5 new papers

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Expressivity.

Period ending 2026-09-14

1 new paper

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Expressivity.

Period ending 2026-09-07

2 new papers

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Expressivity.

122 papers

Latest in Expressivity

Oct 14, 2025cs.MA

Benefits and Limitations of Communication in Multi-Agent Reasoning

Chain-of-thought prompting has popularized step-by-step reasoning in large language models, yet model performance still degrades as problem complexity and context length grow. By decomposing difficult tasks with long contexts into shorter, manageable ones, recent multi-agent paradigms offer a promising near-term solution to this problem. However, the fundamental capacities of such systems are poorly understood. In this work, we propose a theoretical framework to analyze the expressivity of multi-agent systems. We apply our framework to three algorithmic families: state tracking, recall, and kk-hop reasoning. We derive bounds on (i) the number of agents required to solve the task exactly, (ii) the quantity and structure of inter-agent communication, and (iii) the achievable speedups as problem size and context scale. Our results identify regimes where communication is provably beneficial, delineate tradeoffs between agent count and bandwidth, and expose intrinsic limitations when either resource is constrained. We complement our theoretical analysis with a set of experiments on pretrained LLMs using controlled synthetic benchmarks. Empirical outcomes confirm the tradeoffs between key quantities predicted by our theory. Collectively, our analysis offers principled guidance for designing scalable multi-agent reasoning systems.
Michael Rizvi-Martel, Satwik Bhattamishra, Neil Rathi +2
Jul 13, 2023cs.LG

Deep Network Approximation: Beyond ReLU to Diverse Activation Functions

This paper explores the expressive power of deep neural networks for a diverse range of activation functions. An activation function set A\mathscr{A} is defined to encompass the majority of commonly used activation functions, such as ReLU\mathtt{ReLU}, LeakyReLU\mathtt{LeakyReLU}, ReLU2\mathtt{ReLU}^2, ELU\mathtt{ELU}, CELU\mathtt{CELU}, SELU\mathtt{SELU}, Softplus\mathtt{Softplus}, GELU\mathtt{GELU}, SiLU\mathtt{SiLU}, Swish\mathtt{Swish}, Mish\mathtt{Mish}, Sigmoid\mathtt{Sigmoid}, Tanh\mathtt{Tanh}, Arctan\mathtt{Arctan}, Softsign\mathtt{Softsign}, dSiLU\mathtt{dSiLU}, and SRS\mathtt{SRS}. We demonstrate that for any activation function ϱA\varrho\in \mathscr{A}, a ReLU\mathtt{ReLU} network of width NN and depth LL can be approximated to arbitrary precision by a ϱ\varrho-activated network of width 3N3N and depth 2L2L on any bounded set. This finding enables the extension of most approximation results achieved with ReLU\mathtt{ReLU} networks to a wide variety of other activation functions, albeit with slightly increased constants. Significantly, we establish that the (width,\,depth) scaling factors can be further reduced from (3,2)(3,2) to (1,1)(1,1) if ϱ\varrho falls within a specific subset of A\mathscr{A}. This subset includes activation functions such as ELU\mathtt{ELU}, CELU\mathtt{CELU}, SELU\mathtt{SELU}, Softplus\mathtt{Softplus}, GELU\mathtt{GELU}, SiLU\mathtt{SiLU}, Swish\mathtt{Swish}, and Mish\mathtt{Mish}.
Shijun Zhang, Jianfeng Lu, Hongkai Zhao