Image Quality Assessment
Latest papers 168
17 papers in the last four weeks, up 13% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.
Recent text-to-image models have improved global realism, but text rendering remains a persistent failure mode: images may look convincing overall, yet local typography often contains malformed glyphs, broken strokes, irregular spacing, and other artifacts that humans heavily penalize. We formulate Text-in-Image Quality Assessment (TIQA), a no-reference task that estimates a human-aligned perceptual quality score for detected text regions while disentangling visual text quality from semantic correctness. To support this setting, we introduce two datasets. TIQA-Crops contains 120k text crops from 36k AI-generated images produced by 12 generators, with 10k mean-opinion-score (MOS) labels and 110k proxy labels for pretraining. TIQA-Images contains 1,500 text-heavy images from 10 recent generators, including proprietary systems, with paired overall-quality and text-quality subjective scores. We also propose ANTIQA, a lightweight predictor with text-specific inductive biases. Across crop-level and image-level evaluations, ANTIQA achieves the best alignment with human judgments, reaching PLCC/SROCC of 0.942/0.935 on TIQA-Crops and 0.842/0.837 for text-quality MOS on unseen generators in TIQA-Images. In best-of-5 AI-generated image ranking, ANTIQA improves the text quality of the selected image by 0.36 MOS (14%), demonstrating utility for benchmarking, filtering, and generation-time selection. Together, these findings establish perceptual text quality as a distinct evaluation target for modern text-to-image generation.
Interpretable Motion Artificat Detection in structural Brain MRI
Automated quality assessment of structural brain MRI is an important prerequisite for reliable neuroimaging analysis, but yet remains challenging due to motion artifacts and poor generalization across acquisition sites. Existing approaches based on image quality metrics (IQMs) or deep learning either requires extensive preprocessing, which incurs high computational cost, or poor generalization to unseen data. In this work, we propose a lightweight and interpretable framework for detecting motion related artifacts in T1 weighted brain MRI by extending the Discriminative Histogram of Gradient Magnitude (DHoGM) to a three dimensional space. The proposed method integrates complementary slice-level (2D) and volume-level (3D) DHoGM features through a parallel decision strategy, capturing both localized and global motion-induced degradation. Volumetric analysis is performed using overlapping 3D cuboids to achieve comprehensive spatial coverage while maintaining computational efficiency. A simple threshold-based classifier and a low parameter multilayer perceptron are used, which results in a model with only 209 trainable parameters. Our method was evaluated on the MR-ART and ABIDE datasets under both seen-site and unseen-site conditions. Experimental results demonstrate strong performance, achieving up to 94.34% accuracy the in domain evaluation and 89% accuracy on unseen sites, while almost completely avoiding false acceptance of poor-quality scans. Ablation studies confirms the complementary benefits of combining 2D and 3D features. Overall, the proposed approach offers an effective, efficient, and robust solution for automated MRI quality check, with strong potential for integration into large scale clinical and research workflows.
How far have we gone in Generative Image Restoration? A study on its capability, limitations and evaluation practices
Generative Image Restoration (GIR) has achieved impressive perceptual realism, but how far have its practical capabilities truly advanced compared with previous methods? To answer this, we present a large-scale study grounded in a new multi-dimensional evaluation pipeline that assesses models on detail, sharpness, semantic correctness, and overall quality. Our analysis covers diverse architectures, including diffusion-based, GAN-based, PSNR-oriented, and general-purpose generation models, revealing critical performance disparities. Furthermore, our analysis uncovers a key evolution in failure modes that signifies a paradigm shift for the perception-oriented low-level vision field. The central challenge is evolving from the previous problem of detail scarcity (under-generation) to the new frontier of detail quality and semantic control (preventing over-generation). We also leverage our benchmark to train a new IQA model that better aligns with human perceptual judgments. Ultimately, this work provides a systematic study of modern generative image restoration models, offering crucial insights that redefine our understanding of their true state and chart a course for future development.
SIQA: Toward Reliable Scientific Image Quality Assessment
Scientific images fundamentally differ from natural and AI-generated images in that they encode structured domain knowledge rather than merely depict visual scenes. Assessing their quality therefore requires evaluating not only perceptual fidelity but also scientific correctness and logical completeness. However, existing image quality assessment (IQA) paradigms primarily focus on perceptual distortions or image-text alignment, implicitly assuming that depicted content is factually valid. This assumption breaks down in scientific contexts, where visually plausible figures may still contain conceptual errors or incomplete reasoning. To address this gap, we introduce Scientific Image Quality Assessment (SIQA), a framework that models scientific image quality along two complementary dimensions: Knowledge (Scientific Validity and Scientific Completeness) and Perception (Cognitive Clarity and Disciplinary Conformity). To operationalize this formulation, we design two evaluation protocols: SIQA-U (Understanding), which measures semantic comprehension of scientific content through multiple-choice tasks, and SIQA-S (Scoring), which evaluates alignment with expert quality judgments. We further construct the SIQA Challenge, consisting of an expert-annotated benchmark and a large-scale training set. Experiments across representative multimodal large language models (MLLMs) reveal a consistent discrepancy between scoring alignment and scientific understanding. While models can achieve strong agreement with expert ratings under SIQA-S, their performance on SIQA-U remains substantially lower. Fine-tuning improves both metrics, yet gains in scoring consistently outpace improvements in understanding. These results suggest that rating consistency alone may not reliably reflect scientific comprehension, underscoring the necessity of multidimensional evaluation for scientific image quality assessment.
Scalable Evaluation of the Realism of Synthetic Environmental Augmentations in Images
Evaluation of AI systems often requires synthetic test cases, particularly for rare or safety-critical conditions that are difficult to observe in operational data. Generative AI offers a promising approach for producing such data through controllable image editing, but its usefulness depends on whether the resulting images are sufficiently realistic to support meaningful evaluation. We present a scalable framework for assessing the realism of synthetic image-editing methods and apply it to the task of adding environmental conditions-fog, rain, snow, and nighttime-to car-mounted camera images. Using 40 clear-day images, we compare rule-based augmentation libraries with generative AI image-editing models. Realism is evaluated using two complementary automated metrics: a vision-language model (VLM) jury for perceptual realism assessment, and embedding-based distributional analysis to measure similarity to genuine adverse-condition imagery. Generative AI methods substantially outperform rule-based approaches, with the best generative method achieving approximately 3.6 times the acceptance rate of the best rule-based method. Performance varies across conditions: fog proves easiest to simulate, while nighttime transformations remain challenging. Notably, the VLM jury assigns imperfect acceptance even to real adverse-condition imagery, establishing practical ceilings against which synthetic methods can be judged. By this standard, leading generative methods match or exceed real-image performance for most conditions. These results suggest that modern generative image-editing models can enable scalable generation of realistic adverse-condition imagery for evaluation pipelines. Our framework therefore provides a practical approach for scalable realism evaluation, though validation against human studies remains an important direction for future work.
Fine-grained Image Aesthetic Assessment: Learning Discriminative Scores from Relative Ranks
Image aesthetic assessment (IAA) has extensive applications in content creation, album management, and recommendation systems, etc. In such applications, it is commonly needed to pick out the most aesthetically pleasing image from a series of images with subtle aesthetic variations, a topic we refer to as fine-grained IAA. Unfortunately, state-of-the-art IAA models are typically designed for coarse-grained evaluation, where images with notable aesthetic differences are evaluated independently on an absolute scale. These models are inherently limited in discriminating fine-grained aesthetic differences. To address the dilemma, we contribute FGAesthetics, a fine-grained IAA database with 32,217 images organized into 10,028 series, which are sourced from diverse categories including Natural, AIGC, and Cropping. Annotations are collected via pairwise comparisons within each series. We also devise Series Refinement and Rank Calibration to ensure the reliability of data and labels. Based on FGAesthetics, we further propose FGAesQ, a novel IAA framework that learns discriminative aesthetic scores from relative ranks through Difference-preserved Tokenization (DiffToken), Comparative Text-assisted Alignment (CTAlign), and Rank-aware Regression (RankReg). FGAesQ enables accurate aesthetic assessment in fine-grained scenarios while still maintains competitive performance in coarse-grained evaluation. Extensive experiments and comparisons demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method.
Position: Evaluation of Visual Processing Should Be Human-Centered, Not Metric-Centered
This position paper argues that the evaluation of modern visual processing systems should no longer be driven primarily by single-metric image quality assessment benchmarks, particularly in the era of generative and perception-oriented methods. Image restoration exemplifies this divergence: while objective IQA metrics enable reproducible, scalable evaluation, they have increasingly drifted apart from human perception and user preferences. We contend that this mismatch risks constraining innovation and misguiding research progress across visual processing tasks. Rather than rejecting metrics altogether, this paper calls for a rebalancing of evaluation paradigms, advocating a more human-centered, context-aware, and fine-grained approach to assessing the visual models' outcomes.
FluoCLIP: Stain-Aware Focus Quality Assessment in Fluorescence Microscopy
Accurate focus quality assessment (FQA) in fluorescence microscopy is challenging due to stain-dependent optical variations that induce heterogeneous focus behavior across images. Existing methods, however, treat focus quality as a stain-agnostic problem, assuming a shared global ordering. We formulate stain-aware FQA for fluorescence microscopy, showing that focus-rank relationships vary substantially across stains due to stain-dependent imaging characteristics and invalidate this assumption. To support this formulation, we introduce FluoMix, the first dataset for stain-aware FQA spanning multiple tissues, fluorescent stains, and focus levels. We further propose FluoCLIP, a two-stage vision-language framework that grounds stain semantics and enables stain-conditioned ordinal reasoning for focus prediction, effectively decoupling stain representation from ordinal structure. By explicitly modeling stain-dependent focus behavior, FluoCLIP consistently outperforms both conventional FQA methods and recent vision-language baselines, demonstrating strong generalization across diverse fluorescence microscopy conditions. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://fluoclip.github.io/.
Perceptual Quality Optimization of Image Super-Resolution
Single-image super-resolution (SR) has achieved remarkable progress with deep learning, yet most approaches rely on distortion-oriented losses or heuristic perceptual priors, which often lead to a trade-off between fidelity and visual quality. To address this issue, we propose an Efficient Perceptual Bi-directional Attention Network (Efficient-PBAN) that explicitly optimizes SR towards human-preferred quality. Unlike patch-based quality models, Efficient-PBAN avoids extensive patch sampling and enables efficient image-level perception. The proposed framework is trained on our self-constructed SR quality dataset that covers a wide range of state-of-the-art SR methods with corresponding human opinion scores. Using this dataset, Efficient-PBAN learns to predict perceptual quality in a way that correlates strongly with subjective judgments. The learned metric is further integrated into SR training as a differentiable perceptual loss, enabling closed-loop alignment between reconstruction and perceptual assessment. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach delivers superior perceptual quality. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/Lighting-YXLI/Efficient-PBAN.
BiRQA: Bidirectional Robust Quality Assessment for Images
Full-Reference image quality assessment (FR IQA) is important for image compression, restoration and generative modeling, yet current neural metrics remain slow and vulnerable to adversarial perturbations. We present BiRQA, a compact FR IQA metric model that processes four fast complementary features within a bidirectional multiscale pyramid. A bottom-up attention module injects fine-scale cues into coarse levels through an uncertainty-aware gate, while a top-down cross-gating block routes semantic context back to high resolution. To enhance robustness, we introduce Anchored Adversarial Training, a theoretically grounded strategy that uses clean "anchor" samples and a ranking loss to bound pointwise prediction error under attacks. On five public FR IQA benchmarks BiRQA outperforms or matches the previous state of the art (SOTA) while running ~3x faster than previous SOTA models. Under unseen white-box attacks it lifts SROCC from 0.30-0.57 to 0.60-0.84 on KADID-10k, demonstrating substantial robustness gains. To our knowledge, BiRQA is the only FR IQA model combining competitive accuracy with real-time throughput and strong adversarial resilience.
Subtle Motion Blur Detection and Segmentation from Static Image Artworks
Streaming services serve hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide, where visual assets such as thumbnails, box art, and cover images are critical for engagement. Subtle motion blur remains a pervasive quality issue, reducing visual clarity and negatively affecting user trust and click-through rates. However, motion blur detection from static images is underexplored, as existing methods and datasets focus on severe blur and lack fine-grained pixel-level annotations needed for quality-critical applications. Benchmarks such as GOPRO and NFS are dominated by strong synthetic blur and often contain residual blur in their sharp references, leading to ambiguous supervision. We propose SMBlurDetect, a unified framework combining high-quality motion blur specific dataset generation with an end-to-end detector capable of zero-shot detection at multiple granularities. Our pipeline synthesizes realistic motion blur from super high resolution aesthetic images using controllable camera and object motion simulations over SAM segmented regions, enhanced with alpha-aware compositing and balanced sampling to generate subtle, spatially localized blur with precise ground truth masks. We train a U-Net based detector with ImageNet pretrained encoders using a hybrid mask and image centric strategy incorporating curriculum learning, hard negatives, focal loss, blur frequency channels, and resolution aware augmentation.Our method achieves strong zero-shot generalization, reaching 89.68% accuracy on GoPro (vs 66.50% baseline) and 59.77% Mean IoU on CUHK (vs 9.00% baseline), demonstrating 6.6x improvement in segmentation. Qualitative results show accurate localization of subtle blur artifacts, enabling automated filtering of low quality frames and precise region of interest extraction for intelligent cropping.
Image Quality Assessment: Exploring Quality Awareness via Memory-driven Distortion Patterns Matching
Existing full-reference image quality assessment (FR-IQA) methods achieve high-precision evaluation by analysing feature differences between reference and distorted images. However, their performance is constrained by the quality of the reference image, which limits real-world applications where ideal reference sources are unavailable. Notably, the human visual system has the ability to accumulate visual memory, allowing image quality assessment on the basis of long-term memory storage. Inspired by this biological memory mechanism, we propose a memory-driven quality-aware framework (MQAF), which establishes a memory bank for storing distortion patterns and dynamically switches between dual-mode quality assessment strategies to reduce reliance on high-quality reference images. When reference images are available, MQAF obtains reference-guided quality scores by adaptively weighting reference information and comparing the distorted image with stored distortion patterns in the memory bank. When the reference image is absent, the framework relies on distortion patterns in the memory bank to infer image quality, enabling no-reference quality assessment (NR-IQA). The experimental results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches across multiple datasets while adapting to both no-reference and full-reference tasks.
From Global to Granular: Revealing IQA Model Performance via Correlation Surface
Evaluation of Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models has long been dominated by global correlation metrics, such as Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficient (PLCC) and Spearman Rank-Order Correlation Coefficient (SRCC). While widely adopted, these metrics reduce performance to a single scalar, failing to capture how ranking consistency varies across the local quality spectrum. For example, two IQA models may achieve identical SRCC values, yet one ranks high-quality images (related to high Mean Opinion Score, MOS) more reliably, while the other better discriminates image pairs with small quality/MOS differences (related to MOS). Such complementary behaviors are invisible under global metrics. Moreover, SRCC and PLCC are sensitive to test-sample quality distributions, yielding unstable comparisons across test sets. To address these limitations, we propose Granularity-Modulated Correlation (GMC), which provides a structured, fine-grained analysis of IQA performance. GMC includes: (1) a Granularity Modulator that applies Gaussian-weighted correlations conditioned on absolute MOS values and pairwise MOS differences (MOS) to examine local performance variations, and (2) a Distribution Regulator that regularizes correlations to mitigate biases from non-uniform quality distributions. The resulting correlation surface maps correlation values as a joint function of MOS and MOS, providing a 3D representation of IQA performance. Experiments on standard benchmarks show that GMC reveals performance characteristics invisible to scalar metrics, offering a more informative and reliable paradigm for analyzing, comparing, and deploying IQA models. Codes are available at https://github.com/Dniaaa/GMC.
Zoom-IQA: Image Quality Assessment with Reliable Region-Aware Reasoning
Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is a long-standing problem in computer vision. Previous methods typically focus on predicting numerical scores without explanation or providing low-level descriptions lacking precise scores. Recent reasoning-based vision language models (VLMs) have shown strong potential for IQA by jointly generating quality descriptions and scores. However, existing VLM-based IQA methods often suffer from unreliable reasoning due to their limited capability of integrating visual and textual cues. In this work, we introduce Zoom-IQA, a VLM-based IQA model to explicitly emulate key cognitive behaviors: uncertainty awareness, region reasoning, and iterative refinement. Specifically, we present a two-stage training pipeline: 1) supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on our Grounded-Rationale-IQA (GR-IQA) dataset to teach the model to ground its assessments in key regions, and 2) reinforcement learning (RL) for dynamic policy exploration, stabilized by our KL-Coverage regularizer to prevent reasoning and scoring diversity collapse, with a Progressive Re-sampling Strategy for mitigating annotation bias. Extensive experiments show that Zoom-IQA achieves improved robustness, explainability, and generalization. The application to downstream tasks, such as image restoration, further demonstrates the effectiveness of Zoom-IQA.
FoCLIP: A Feature-Space Misalignment Framework for CLIP-Based Image Manipulation and Detection
The well-aligned attribute of CLIP-based models enables its effective application like CLIPscore as a widely adopted image quality assessment metric. However, such a CLIP-based metric is vulnerable for its delicate multimodal alignment. In this work, we propose FoCLIP, a feature-space misalignment framework for fooling CLIP-based image quality metric. Based on the stochastic gradient descent technique, FoCLIP integrates three key components to construct fooling examples: feature alignment as the core module to reduce image-text modality gaps, the score distribution balance module and pixel-guard regularization, which collectively optimize multimodal output equilibrium between CLIPscore performance and image quality. Such a design can be engineered to maximize the CLIPscore predictions across diverse input prompts, despite exhibiting either visual unrecognizability or semantic incongruence with the corresponding adversarial prompts from human perceptual perspectives. Experiments on ten artistic masterpiece prompts and ImageNet subsets demonstrate that optimized images can achieve significant improvement in CLIPscore while preserving high visual fidelity. In addition, we found that grayscale conversion induces significant feature degradation in fooling images, exhibiting noticeable CLIPscore reduction while preserving statistical consistency with original images. Inspired by this phenomenon, we propose a color channel sensitivity-driven tampering detection mechanism that achieves 91% accuracy on standard benchmarks. In conclusion, this work establishes a practical pathway for feature misalignment in CLIP-based multimodal systems and the corresponding defense method.
Adversarial Stress Testing of Outlier Detection in Subjective Image Quality Assessment
In subjective image and video quality assessment, observers rate or compare selected stimuli. Before calculating mean opinion scores (MOSs), unreliable ratings should be identified and handled as outliers. Several outlier-detection methods are available, including standardized procedures, but their comparative performance is often evaluated using only specific types of synthetic outliers such as random clickers. Such tests do not necessarily reveal the worst-case behavior of these methods. To address this gap, we introduce and demonstrate a general empirical worst-case framework for outlier-detection methods, with proof-of-concept adversarial attack generators for both discrete absolute category and continuous visual analog scale ratings. The attacks use optimization algorithms to identify ratings that maximize the discrepancy between the resulting MOS estimates and the ground truth. We apply the proposed framework to several hard and soft outlier-detection methods and demonstrate substantial differences in their worst-case reconstruction performance under adversarial stress. We also propose several low-complexity outlier-detection methods that achieve excellent empirical worst-case performance.
Q-SiT: Teaching LMMs for Image Quality Scoring and Interpreting
Image quality scoring and interpreting are two fundamental components of Image Quality Assessment (IQA). The former quantifies image quality, while the latter enables descriptive question answering about image quality. Traditionally, these two tasks have been addressed independently. However, image-quality-specific psychophysical studies suggest that these two tasks are conceptually interconnected: interpreting explicitly represents perceived quality attributes whereas scoring summarizes such evidence into an overall quality judgment. Thus, unifying these capabilities within a single model is both intuitive and logically coherent. In this paper, we propose Q-SiT (Quality Scoring and Interpreting joint Teaching), a unified framework that enables large multimodal models (LMMs) to learn both image quality scoring and interpreting simultaneously. We achieve this by transforming conventional IQA datasets into learnable question-answering datasets and incorporating human-annotated quality interpreting data for training. Furthermore, we introduce an efficient scoring & interpreting balance strategy, which first determines the optimal data mix ratio on lightweight LMMs and then maps this ratio to primary LMMs for fine-tuning adjustment. This strategy not only mitigates task interference and enhances cross-task knowledge transfer but also significantly reduces computational costs compared to direct optimization on full-scale LMMs. With this joint learning framework and corresponding training strategy, we develop Q-SiT, the first model capable of simultaneously performing image quality scoring and interpreting tasks, along with its lightweight variant, Q-SiT-mini. Experimental results demonstrate that Q-SiT achieves strong performance in both tasks with superior generalization IQA abilities, while Q-SiT-mini significantly reduces computational overhead while maintaining competitive performance.
CatSIM: A Categorical Image Similarity Metric
We introduce CatSIM, a new similarity metric for binary and multinary two- and three-dimensional images and volumes. CatSIM uses a structural similarity image quality paradigm and is robust to small perturbations in location so that structures in similar, but not entirely overlapping, image or volumetric regions are rated higher than by simple matching. The metric can also compare arbitrary regions inside images and volumes. CatSIM is evaluated on artificial data sets, validated by comparing with human perception in two separate image quality assessment surveys, and illustrated on two datasets. The publicly available R package
catsim implements the methodology.