Image Quality Assessment

This paper proposes a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework for scientific image quality assessment, designed to simultaneously address both the understanding track (SIQA-U) and the scoring track (SIQA-S) of the SIQA challenge. We construct a multimodal index that integrates textual semantics with fine-grained visual features, and develop a multi-route retrieval and fusion mechanism to provide large language models with highly relevant reference cases, thereby enhancing their capability to evaluate complex scientific images. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework effectively aligns with the judgment criteria of human experts. Ultimately, our method achieves 1st place in the SIQA-U track of the SIQA challenge at the ICME 2026 Grand Challenges.

Synthetic data can reduce the cost of collecting and annotating training data for robotic perception, but generating sensor observations that preserve the characteristics relevant to downstream perception remains challenging, particularly for sonar imagery. In this work, we investigate whether conventional image-fidelity metrics adequately reflect the downstream perception performance of GAN-generated synthetic sonar data. We employ a Pix2Pix conditional generative adversarial network with four discriminator configurations characterized by different receptive fields: PixelGAN, PatchGAN-16, PatchGAN-70, and ImageGAN. The models are trained using sonar imagery from two datasets and evaluated using conventional image-fidelity metrics, including Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), and Mean Squared Error (MSE). To complement these pixel-level measures with task-oriented evaluation, YOLOX-S, YOLOX-L, and Faster R-CNN detectors are trained exclusively on real sonar imagery and subsequently evaluated on the GAN-generated images using identical test samples and annotations across all discriminator configurations. The results reveal a discrepancy between image-fidelity and downstream object-detection performance: the configuration achieving the best SSIM, PSNR, and MSE does not consistently yield the best detection performance. In particular, PatchGAN configurations achieve strong downstream detection results despite not achieving the highest pixel-level similarity scores. These findings suggest, for the datasets and models considered, pixel-level image-fidelity metrics alone may not consistently capture the task-relevant realism of synthetic sonar observations and motivate the use of task-aware evaluation for synthetic sensor data intended for robotic perception.

Leveraging Large Vision-Language Models like CLIP has recently set new benchmarks for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA). However, the contrastive pretraining of CLIP inherently prioritizes semantic invariance, which often suppresses subtle perceptual signals, a phenomenon we term perceptual submergence. Furthermore, standard preprocessing techniques (e.g., cropping and interpolation) further exacerbate the loss of critical high-frequency quality cues. In this paper, we propose the Cross-modal Perception Alignment Adapter (CMPA), a manifold-aware framework designed to disentangle perceptual distortions from dominant semantics. CMPA introduces a Perception-Sensitive Feature Extractor (PFE) that projects CLIP features into a compact, low-dimensional subspace, explicitly magnifying distortion-induced off-manifold deviations. Subsequently, a Cross-Modal Perception Alignment Injector (PAI) aligns these features with quality-aware text anchors and re-injects them into the backbone. To ensure input fidelity, we also devise a Residual-enhanced Perceptual Downscaling strategy that adaptively compensates for resolution-induced information loss using Just Noticeable Difference (JND) guided frequency re-injection. Extensive evaluations on several benchmark datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, effectively recovering the perceptual signals submerged in semantic-dense representations.

Purpose: Paired pre- and post-operative photographs are the standard unit of evidence for plastic surgical outcomes, yet no objective metric verifies whether two images of the same patient were captured under conditions consistent for comparison. Approach: We developed a perceptually motivated pipeline that analyzes pre/post pairs across thirteen calibrated sub-metrics, partitioned by unsupervised correlation-structure analysis into five data-driven clusters (photometric, texture / sharpness, pose, illumination direction, and pitch), averaged within each cluster and combined across clusters by a weighted sum into a single consistency score. Each sub-metric is calibrated so that its median difference across published within-patient pairs scores 0.5, which is a reference point and carries no pass/fail meaning. The pipeline was calibrated on 134 matched within-patient published pre/post pairs and evaluated against identical-image pairs, synthetic-perturbation pairs, and 134 mismatched cross-publication pairs. Results: The master consistency score S separated matched from mismatched pairs (sensitivity index d' = 2.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.83, 2.55]; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve AUC = 0.928, 95% CI [0.896, 0.959]), closely matching Gaussian-equal-variance predictions. The three head-pose angles did not fall in one cluster: yaw and roll grouped together while pitch separated. Identical pairs scored at ceiling (S = 0.99) and the master score fell monotonically with perturbation magnitude on all five perturbation axes. Conclusions: The score quantifies photographic comparability, not aesthetic or surgical quality, and provides a freely available web tool for auditing the photographic comparability of pre/post pairs, pending validation against expert judgment.

In real-time colonoscopy, ground-truth annotations are unavailable at inference, so polyp segmentation models can fail silently. We propose Referee-Based Quality Estimation (RBQE), a reference-free framework measuring agreement between a primary segmentation model and an independently trained referee on the same image. RBQE is evaluated on a standardized 1,223-image external benchmark drawn from four public datasets, using four referee configurations chosen to separate two design axes: referee independence and architectural diversity. Using a common Agreement Dice descriptor, a same-architecture referee differing from the primary model only in random initialization already yields a useful reliability signal (ROC-AUC = 0.923), showing that independent training alone is sufficient. Cross-architecture referees improve further: SegFormer-B0 achieves the strongest performance (ROC-AUC = 0.960), significantly outperforming the same-architecture control and UNet++, and exceeding a representative Test-Time Augmentation baseline by 0.055 ROC-AUC under an identical protocol, whereas a prompt-coupled MedSAM referee underperforms despite maximal architectural diversity. Because empty-mask agreement is trivially separable, we also report a restricted evaluation excluding such cases: ROC-AUC falls to 0.876 (SegFormer-B0, 1,046 images) and 0.783 (same-architecture control, 975 images), yet RBQE's margin over both baselines widens on this identical subset. RBQE additionally increases the mean Dice of retained predictions as low-agreement cases are progressively rejected, supporting selective prediction, and requires only one additional deterministic referee forward pass at inference. Our study therefore supports cross-model agreement as a practical, interpretable reliability framework for automated polyp segmentation.

Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in image quality assessment (IQA) by bridging visual perception with descriptive evaluations. However, existing approaches mainly focus on holistic quality prediction, often functioning as black boxes that provide limited insight into where distortions occur and how they affect perceived quality, hindering fine-grained analysis of localized and heterogeneous degradations. We propose GS-IQA, a framework that reformulates IQA as a progressive Where--What--How diagnosis, emulating the human perceptual process from an initial glance to closer scrutiny. Since a severity judgment is meaningful only for a correctly localized and recognized region, we realize this progression through a two-stage reinforcement learning paradigm that respects such dependencies: the glance stage uses a perception-gated reward to establish where degradations lie and what they are, activating severity feedback only once both are correct, while the scrutiny stage introduces online reward-conditioned degradation generation to synthesize hard examples targeted at the model's perceptual bottlenecks, sharpening its discrimination of subtle severity variations. To enable systematic evaluation, we construct Diag-Bench, a region-level IQA benchmark of about 25K curated samples spanning 12 distortion types and five ordinal severity levels. Extensive experiments show that GS-IQA consistently surpasses state-of-the-art methods in distortion localization, recognition, and severity estimation, and that its diagnostic representations transfer effectively to conventional global quality prediction across diverse external benchmarks. Code and data will be released.

Low-quality face recognition (LQFR) remains challenging due to the difficulty of matching degraded query (probe) images against low-quality (LQ) enrollment (gallery) imagery and the scarcity of training data for large-scale models. While recent face recognition (FR) models perform well on high-quality (HQ) imagery, their accuracy drops significantly on LQ images with extremely low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Moreover, fine-tuning HQ-pretrained models on LQ data often improves LQ recognition at the expense of HQ generalization. This trade-off becomes more pronounced in modern evaluation settings spanning multiple datasets with varying image quality levels. To address these limitations, we propose a unified framework that combines three main components: (1) Local Probability Margin (LPM), which estimates per-sample difficulty directly from the model's discriminative landscape; (2) Nested Attention Module (NAM), a new low-rank adapter module that embeds a self-attention mechanism within selected transformer layers; and (3) Quality Gating Protocol (QGP), where an off-the-shelf image quality estimator modulates the adapter contribution at test time, enabling a single model to handle the full quality spectrum without sacrificing HQ performance. Experiments on surveillance (TinyFace, SurvFace) and standard (IJB-B, IJB-C) face recognition benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains in both identification and verification. Code and models will be released at github.com/candllq/nam.

Corrupted, inconsistent, or anomalous data silently threatens the safety and reliability of medical AI. Despite growing regulatory recognition of dataset quality assurance (QA) for high-risk medical AI, scalable automated detection remains underdeveloped. We employ unsupervised anomaly detection (AD) and out-of-distribution (OOD) detection as an automated dataset QA mechanism for multi-center dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. We build a controlled AD benchmark of 17 realistic QA-relevant anomaly types from six public datasets (protocol violations, processing errors, incorrect anatomical regions) and propose a taxonomy of radiological image anomalies based on human visual perception, enabling fine-grained analysis of AD failure modes. The benchmark includes near-, medium-far-, far-OOD samples, as well as in-distribution and external normal data. Four methods are evaluated: a projection-based method extended with a domain-specific feature extractor and a novel positional encoding, a reconstruction-based approach extended to full 3D volumes with an augmented training objective, and two unmodified hybrid OOD detection methods. Medium-far- and far-OOD samples are detected reliably, whereas near-OOD samples and external normal data from unseen institutions expose method-specific differences. The 3D reconstruction-based approach best balances detection performance (AUROC: 0.936) and generalization to unseen institutions. The projection-based method with positional encoding achieves the highest overall detection performance (AUROC: 0.954). Both hybrid methods exhibit critical failure modes, confirming that methods validated for one modality or anatomy may not generalize without domain-specific adaptation. Implants and mastectomies remain an open challenge for all methods. Our results establish a foundation and practical guidance on scalable unsupervised QA in medical AI pipelines.

Indic quality estimation (QE) and automatic post-editing (APE) data is spread across separate releases, so no single resource supports training and evaluation across tasks and language pairs on one footing. We consolidate the WMT 2020-2024 shared-task lineage with an extended English-Malayalam resource into IndicQE-APE: $126{,}754$ instances over nine directional pairs, with up to four label types aligned on the same segment, a direct assessment, a human post-edit, word-level tags and an error explanation, and a test set stratified over four difficulty axes. We benchmark six prompted LLMs and three COMET metrics on segment-level QE, and three systems on APE. Two of the axes are defined partly on direct assessment and select a compressed slice of it. Segments whose segment-level and token-level signals disagree are ranked below equally scored segments of the same language. Four-shot prompting costs every model at or below $3.4$B both correlation and output-format compliance. Unedited MT beats every APE system we run on three of the four pairs. The benchmark (https://huggingface.co/datasets/surrey-nlp/IndicQE-APE) and code (https://github.com/surrey-nlp/IndicQE-APE) are released.

Digital restoration of historical manuscript images aims to improve readability while preserving the authenticity of cultural heritage documents. However, evaluating quality of restored manuscripts remains challenging, where readability is often subjective and expert annotations are scarce. This study investigates the suitability of contrast-based image quality measures to assess quality and legibility of reconstructed manuscript images from multi-spectral imaging. Two experiments were conducted with publicly-available data sets, facilitating manual quality scores by experts and full-reference image quality measures as reference evaluations. The results show that potential contrast achieves the highest correlation with expert ratings, while contrast-to-noise ratio demonstrates the strongest agreement with full-reference quality measures. Overall, contrast-based measures consistently outperform general image quality measures, demonstrating their potential as objective indicators of manuscript legibility and reconstruction quality.

The localized depiction of perceptual quality has long been a crucial, yet underexplored, challenge in image quality assessment (IQA). Existing approaches based on large multimodal models (LMMs) predominantly rely on text-driven supervised fine-tuning (SFT). However, this training paradigm exhibits notable limitations in detection accuracy. Moreover, synthetically distorted images, which are often used as the primary training data source, show a significant generalization gap when deployed in real-world scenarios; thus, the \textbf{synthetic-to-authentic (\textit{S2A})} problem represents a critical challenge. Motivated by these issues, we propose \textbf{\textit{VIGIL}}, which leverages the LMM architecture for precise visual distortion detection. From a candidate pool of over 1000K samples, we construct the \textbf{\textit{VIGIL-140K}} training set, which consists of over 140K distorted images. These images are obtained through rigorous quality filtering and carefully crafted distortion injection, covering 8 major synthetic distortion categories. Our model leverages different layers of the large language model (LLM) decoder, treating them as \textit{multiple detectors} that perform synchronous distortion detection using multi-level features. Additionally, we retain distortion cues from predictions assigned to the non-distortion class, which helps mitigate the ambiguous foreground-background (\textit{FG-BG}) separation commonly encountered in the \textit{S2A} problem. After post-processing, our model consistently outperforms strong baselines on both in-domain synthetic distortion detection and \textit{S2A} tasks.

Deep learning-based building footprint extraction from high-resolution imagery often produces topologically inconsistent vectors unfit for direct GIS database ingestion. To address this, we present a multidomain GeoAI quality control framework that automates error detection to systematically purify vector footprint databases. Candidate footprints were generated across five UAV survey sites in Bangladesh using U-Net (ResNet-34) and SAM-LoRA (ViT-B). The extracted raster masks were vectorized, geometrically regularized, and consolidated under a spatial-exclusivity constraint to eliminate duplicate representations. We used twenty-four predictors capturing geometric, spatial-contextual, and raster-derived spectral and texture properties. Machine Learning (ML) classifiers were trained on a development partition (Sites B-D) and rigorously validated on a spatially independent test set (Site E) excluded from hyperparameter tuning and class balancing. The experimental results demonstrate that geometric and spatial-contextual predictors using Decision Tree (DT) provide the most effective discriminatory evidence for identifying object-level boundary deformations. DT achieved an accuracy of 95.31%, an F1-score of 91.06%, and a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.880 on the unseen testing site. At the database level, this framework successfully identified 87.34% of erroneous footprints while maintaining 98.31% of acceptable structures, reducing the residual error proportion from 27.32% to 4.62% and improving final database purity to 95.38%. This translates into a relative error reduction of 83.09%. The findings indicate that post-segmentation object-level ML provides a highly transferable, robust mechanism for automated quality assurance in production-ready geographic information system (GIS) workflows.

Large language models (LLMs) show promise in medical image interpretation but suffer from hallucination, limited accuracy, and run-to-run inconsistency. We developed and validated an agentic AI framework integrating LLMs with specialized deep learning tools for glaucoma detection from fundus photography. The workflow had three steps: (1) LLM initial assessment; (2) function calling to invoke specialized tools for image quality (QAModel, FundaQ-8), glaucoma classification (SwinV2-Tiny), and optic disc/cup segmentation (SegFormer-B0); and (3) LLM reflection integrating the initial impression with tool outputs. Two LLMs (Gemini 2.5 Flash, GPT-5.4 mini) were evaluated on two public datasets (ORIGA, n=100; RIM-ONE-v3, n=100) under uncropped and cropped fields of view; all images were independently graded by a masked fellowship-trained glaucoma specialist. The agentic workflow improved classification accuracy by 16 to 47 percentage points across all conditions, reaching within 6 points of the specialist; on RIM-ONE-v3 the best configurations matched the specialist accuracy of 88%. LLM-alone approaches failed in two ways: GPT-5.4 mini showed positive bias (sensitivity 95-100%, specificity 0-5%), while Gemini 2.5 Flash varied stochastically between runs; the agentic workflow corrected both. Cup-to-disc ratio error fell 15-50% (MAE 0.156-0.228 to 0.104-0.132), and correlation with specialist grading rose from weak (r=0.12-0.39) to moderate-strong (r=0.59-0.84). Run-to-run consistency rose from near-random (kappa as low as -0.01) to near-perfect (kappa up to 0.96). Integrating LLMs with specialized tools addressed key limitations of LLM-alone approaches, including over-diagnosis and run-to-run variability. Gains held for both LLMs, suggesting generalizability across backbones, and may signal a shift from monolithic models toward orchestrated multi-agent systems in medical AI.

Scientific images are essential for communicating experimental observations, quantitative evidence and conceptual knowledge. Unlike natural images, their quality depends on both visual clarity and scientific informativeness, making assessment challenging. In this work, we present SciQNet, a two-stage multimodal adaptation framework for scientific image quality assessment. The first stage performs domain-adaptive pretraining on scientific document images and the second stage conducts task-specific fine-tuning with joint scoring and understanding supervision. For scoring-oriented supervision, we combine instruction tuning with a Huber loss derived from rating-word logits, while understanding-oriented supervision is formulated as multiple-choice visual question answering. Experiments show that using a 40% stratified subset of the domain-adaptive data gives the best performance among the evaluated pretraining fractions, suggesting that pretraining-data relevance may be as important as pretraining-data scale. The final model achieves an SIQA-S score of 92.21, an SIQA-U score of 47.38 and a combined score of 69.80. This work presents our solution to the ICME 2026 Scientific Image Quality Assessment Challenge, which ranked 2nd in the scoring track.

Existing reference-free methods for evaluating music perceptual quality alleviate the need for paired noisy-clean data, but they still rely on a background set, which is used to compute aggregated statistics of clean audio samples. In this work, we propose a novel approach that eliminates this requirement, achieving background-set-free and reference-free quality estimation using only a pre-trained Flow Matching backbone. We demonstrate that unconditional Flow Matching inversion via simple Euler integration is sufficient to detect various artificial distortions and accurately rank music generation models against human perceptual judgments. We introduce InvFlowFD, which performs flow inversion and compares a group of inverted samples to the prior distribution. We evaluate our method against prior work, quantitatively and with a thorough human study. Results suggest that InvFlowFD is highly correlated with human perception of sound distortions, as well as generative models' quality, while being more flexible and less restrictive than existing metrics.

3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has become a dominant representation for real-time novel view synthesis (NVS), yet its storage footprint makes compression indispensable for practical deployment. 3DGS training and compression introduce representation-specific distortions such as floating artifacts and surface scattering, which conventional image quality assessment (IQA) metrics fail to capture. Moreover, the independent compression of geometric and color attributes may lead to decoupled dimension-specific distortions that must be diagnosed separately, yet existing metrics report only a single overall score. To address these gaps, we present 3DGS-IEval-15K+, a large-scale, multi-dimensional IQA dataset for compressed 3DGS, comprising 15,200 images from 10 diverse scenes, produced by 6 representative 3DGS algorithms at systematically designed compression levels and rendered from 20 strategically selected viewpoints spanning both training views and challenging novel views, annotated with 45,600 mean opinion scores (MOSs) across overall, geometry, and color quality. Based on 3DGS-IEval-15K+, we propose 3DGSI-Assessor, an all-in-one 3DGS IQA framework that integrates global semantic and dimension-specific local features within a large multimodal model (LMM), predicting all three dimensions in a single forward pass. 3DGSI-Assessor achieves state-of-the-art performance on 3DGS-IEval-15K+, and exhibits competitive generalization on other NVS benchmarks. Dataset and code will be released at https://github.com/YukeXing/3DGSI-Assessor.

Efficient and perceptually meaningful quality assessment is a fundamental requirement for image and video processing, compression, and streaming systems. This article shows that, in the context of Discrete Cosine Transform ( DCT)-based compressed images, Structural Similarity Index ( SSIM ) can be approximated from global Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) or Mean Square Error ( MSE) using local statistics derived only from the reference image. While prior work assumes access to local MSE, we propose two approaches to approximate local MSE by redistributing the global MSE using variance or standard-deviation-based weighting. Experiments on the Kodak and Xiph Subset1 datasets across a range of JPEG quality levels demonstrate that both approaches provide accurate and robust SSIM approximations, substantially outperforming the global MSE baseline. The proposed framework is designed to extend naturally to video, where reference-derived statistics can be amortized across multiple encodes of the same content.

No-reference image quality assessment (NR IQA) has recently benefited from deep and multimodal models, yet many SOTA systems still violate at least one basic requirement: they either discard critical quality cues via aggressive resizing, fail to generalize across resolutions, cannot be jointly trained on heterogeneous IQA datasets with mismatched MOS scales, or require prohibitive computation. We present \textbf{ReLIQS}, a model for \textbf{Re}solution-agnostic \textbf{L}earning for \textbf{I}mage \textbf{Q}uality with \textbf{S}aliency, which is resolution-agnostic, preserves original-resolution quality cues, learns from multiple subjective studies, and remains computationally efficient and budget-adaptive. ReLIQS is a CLIP-based multiscale patch-driven architecture that learns both \emph{where to look} and \emph{how to judge} quality. Fixed-size patches are sampled across multiple resolutions, including the original resolution, and encoded with a CLIP vision backbone. A lightweight Perceptual Importance Estimator then predicts IQA-specific importance maps to select a small set of informative patches, and a Latent Quality Axis Module aggregates their embeddings into a single image-level score. Across authentic, synthetic, and AIGC benchmarks spanning diverse resolutions and distortions, ReLIQS generalizes better than strong CNN-, CLIP-, and MLLM-based baselines with matching or reduced computational cost.

Human pairwise comparison provides a direct basis for perceptual infrared-visible image fusion assessment, but dense annotation becomes costly as method pools grow. We present the Learned Perceptual Image Fusion Measure (LPIFM), among the earliest learned fusion assessors trained directly on dense human A/B/Tie comparisons. LPIFM jointly examines both source images and both fused candidates, combining a shared hierarchical encoder, triadic interaction, and a tie-aware objective to predict comparative preference and perceptual indifference. We construct and publicly release all 6,300 unordered comparisons among 25 methods on 21 VIFB scenes, collected through blinded, randomized annotation and expert adjudication. Across four VIFB evaluation settings, LPIFM achieves 79.2-84.0% agreement with human pairwise judgments and Spearman correlations of 0.941-0.977 with human-derived method rankings. On full method pools, accuracy exceeds the strongest of 19 conventional metrics by 16.3-21.1 pp. Consistency diagnostics show 99.98-100% candidate-swap agreement and no observed decisive preference cycles. External experiments on EVAFusion further demonstrate rapid adaptation to a different fusion-evaluation preference protocol. After only three epochs of fine-tuning, LPIFM surpasses all 19 conventional metrics in accuracy, macro-F1, and ranking correlation. LPIFM provides a scalable instrument for human-aligned fusion assessment, with the preference corpus, model weights, and code publicly available.

Medical image quality plays a critical role in diagnostic accuracy, especially in X-ray-based imaging modalities such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), where image quality must be balanced against radiation dose. While expert visual evaluation remains the clinical standard for image quality evaluation, it is time-consuming, subjective and affected by inter-observer variability, emphasizing the need for reliable quantitative image quality assessment (IQA) methods. However, the development and validation of such IQA methods have been limited by the lack of publicly available CBCT datasets with expert image quality annotations. In this study, we provide the first open-access CBCT IQA dataset containing 1,764 annotated image slices acquired using systematic variations in image acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Three clinical experts graded the overall image quality and a predefined regions of interest (ROI) using a four-level scoring scheme. In addition, we benchmark 26 full reference- and no reference-based IQA measures against expert annotations and introduce an exploratory IQA measure-based ranking capable of distinguishing subtle image quality differences. This dataset introduced a standardized benchmark for future CBCT IQA research and provides a valuable resource for the development and validation of new IQA methods, enabling reproducible research and advancing CBCT IQA.

With rapid growth in the fields of empirical and computational aesthetics we have seen a vast increase in large image datasets annotated for aesthetics. As the image databases differ widely in many respects (e.g., different standards for annotation), it can be tedious to find the dataset that fits one's research needs best. The absence of a centralized open-science search system causes additional problems. Currently, researchers typically share dataset links in papers or on diverse platforms like OSF, GitHub or Dropbox. Manually searching for details like image quality and content often requires downloading all datasets. Therefore, we present the Database Of Datasets for Aesthetics (DODA), an intuitive Web application in which researchers can browse all important datasets for aesthetics research. DODA provides general information about these datasets (size, resolution, type of annotation, number of annotators, etc.) and for many of them also precomputed quantitative image properties. We discuss relevant criteria for selecting a suitable dataset with DODA and illustrate the benefits of reusing datasets. Our approach facilitates collaboration across the fields of empirical and computational aesthetics. Keywords: empirical aesthetics, computational aesthetics, machine learning, image annotation, quantitative image properties, Open Science

Low-light image enhancement (LLIE) methods involve tunable parameters that are typically fixed, often leading to performance degradation when applied across scenes. Manually selecting the best configuration, however, can be time-consuming and not always practical. Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) is the natural fidelity criterion for automating parameter selection, yet it requires a ground-truth reference that is typically unavailable. To our knowledge, no learning-based method addresses no-reference PSNR prediction for low-light image enhancement; the natural surrogate, no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA), targets perceptual quality rather than signal fidelity, and all seven baselines we test achieve 0% top-1 selection accuracy on our benchmark. With paired training data, the ground-truth PSNR is analytically computable, providing exact supervision without a separate teacher network. Building on this, we propose BlindPSNR, a lightweight no-reference network that fuses the enhanced image with the degraded low-light input via windowed cross-attention and estimates PSNR through heteroscedastic regression. While a scalar-regression baseline achieves top-1 accuracy of 54.4%, BlindPSNR raises this to 89.5% with regret dropping from 1.62 dB to 0.026 dB, and generalizes to unseen datasets (SRCC = 0.61-0.67).

Scientific images are the core elements of presenting experimental conclusions, elaborating system architecture, and supporting comparative arguments in scientific papers. However, existing image quality assessment (IQA) methods are predominantly designed for natural photographs or AI-generated content, which cannot be directly applied to scientific papers. The few existing studies on scholarly charts remain confined to visual-surface comparisons, failing to verify caption alignment, citation relevance, or visual misleadingness. To address this, we propose SciFigQual-Bench, a full-text contextual benchmark that evaluates scientific images across five dimensions (clarity, layout, caption fit, context relevance, and misleading risk). The data covers top computer-science conferences from 2020 to 2025; 6,308 images were independently scored by multiple domain experts in five dimensions and aggregated into gold-standard annotations. Unlike previous scientific figure benchmarks, our dataset binds each image to its caption, citing sentence, and manuscript context. To enable automated evaluation on this benchmark, we designed a staged cross-modal evaluation framework SFQ-Agent to achieve auditable and refined scoring through the collection and fusion of modal evidence. Multiple mainstream large models were evaluated on the test subset eval1200, and SFQ-Agent (F3) equipped with GPT-5.6-Sol achieved the lowest overall average absolute error (0.418) and the highest consistency rate (93.4%), consistently outperforming both direct evaluation and auxiliary (Sidecar) visual language model evaluation schemes.

Scientific figure assessment in peer review differs fundamentally from general image quality evaluation: a figure must be visually legible, faithfully support the manuscript's claims, and communicate evidence with a clear visual hierarchy. However, if we apply traditional image assessment methods to scientific figure quality assessment, limitations emerge: classic IQA models capture perceptual quality or aesthetics but cannot judge whether a figure serves the paper's scientific argument; CLIP-based methods assess generic image-text correspondence, yet lack understanding of manuscript context; and zero-shot LLM/VLM judges, when repurposed for figure scoring, often yield overly concentrated scores with limited fusion of visual and textual evidence. We introduce an annotated dataset of 3,857 scientific figures from peer-reviewed conference papers, each rated along four peer-review-oriented dimensions: Clarity, Relevance, Informativeness, and Structure. We propose SciFigAlign, a fine-tuned multimodal scorer that grounds figure quality assessment in manuscript evidence. Given a figure crop, caption, citing paragraphs, and light paper context, SciFigAlign fine-tunes CLIP and SciBERT end-to-end with per-modality cross-attention and CubeMLP fusion, jointly optimizing SmoothL1 regression with a within-paper ranking hinge loss. Under paper-level splits, SciFigAlign achieves a macro MAE of 0.3524 and a within-paper pairwise accuracy of 81.64% on the test set with n = 396, a 59% relative error reduction over the best LLM-as-judge baseline with MAE 0.864. Ablations confirm that manuscript-grounded inputs, citing-context denoising, and ranking supervision are all critical, showing that scientific figure assessment requires learned alignment between visual content and manuscript evidence rather than prompting alone, even with state-of-the-art VLMs.

Chest X-ray (CXR) machine learning relies heavily on automated evaluation using reference standards that aim to approximate clinical judgment. However, commonly used report-derived labels for pathology classification or generic image quality metrics for reconstruction may not reliably reflect clinical judgment. We systematically investigate how evaluation-reference choices affect model performance and ranking in both pathology classification and image quality assessment (IQA). To enable controlled comparison across evaluation references, we collected paired expert image- and report-derived labels for thoracic findings from a clinical cohort at Cambridge University Hospitals (CUH) and curated a subset of the public MIMIC-CXR dataset, along with expert ratings of diagnostic image quality. We show that for supervised image classifiers (ResNet, DenseNet), several zero-shot and fine-tuned vision-language models (e.g., MedKLIP, GLoRIA, and ConVIRT), changing the label source leads to substantial differences not only in performance estimates but also in model rankings. In parallel, alignment of IQA measures with expert judgment depends heavily on the choice of measure, and commonly used IQA metrics such as SSIM and PSNR often fail to align with expert assessments of diagnostic usability. Our results demonstrate that evaluation choices are crucial: they can determine which models and methods appear best and are therefore selected for further development or deployment. The selection of evaluation references should therefore be treated as a central component of clinical validity in CXR machine learning, and justified with respect to the pathology, imaging task, and intended downstream clinical use.

Perception is one of the primary applications where neural networks outperform conventional algorithms. One example is AI systems for automated driving, which can detect pedestrians based on image data and avoid them accordingly. A substantial challenge with these AI systems is that their output depends heavily on the quality of the input images. For example, if an image is of inferior quality due to heavy contamination, such as noise or darkness, accurate predictions are hardly feasible. Additionally, various types of errors can occur, each with varying relevance to the trustworthiness of the underlying AI system. In particular, it may be more critical not to detect an existing person than to detect a person where there is none. Therefore, we want to show that we can still avoid the most critical errors in situations of inferior image quality. To achieve this, we aim to establish a fail-degraded system by lowering the network's confidence threshold based on the estimated image quality, enabling it to detect objects more cautiously in uncertain situations. Additionally, we present a novel method for estimating the quality of incoming images by comparing them to the training data using normalizing flows. We will also conduct experiments applying our method to state-of-the-art object detection. In summary, we will present a design strategy for AI-based systems in automated driving that can deal with poor-quality input data without resorting to fallback solutions. Such measures enhance trust in AI-based systems and lead to an increased provision of the AI component.

Generative diffusion models have revolutionized facial image synthesis, yet robust identity preservation in high resolution outputs remains a critical challenge. This issue is especially vital for security systems, biometric authentication, and privacy sensitive applications, where any drift in identity integrity can undermine trust and functionality. We introduce Diff-ID, a diffusion based framework that enforces identity consistency while delivering photorealistic quality. Central to our approach is a custom 210K image dataset synthesized from CelebA-HQ, FFHQ, and LAION-Face and captioned via a fine tuned BLIP model to bolster identity awareness during training. Diff-ID integrates ArcFace and CLIP embeddings through a dual cross attention adapter within a fine tuned Stable Diffusion UNet. To further reinforce identity fidelity, we propose a pseudo discriminator loss based on ArcFace cosine similarity with exponential timestep weighting. Experiments on held out and unseen faces show that Diff-ID does not exceed InstantID in raw ArcFace Face Similarity, but achieves substantially lower FID and the strongest FIQ based identity--realism trade off among the evaluated methods. We also present a unified DDIM based morphing pipeline that enables qualitative facial interpolation without per identity fine tuning. We further argue that identity preservation and photorealism should be evaluated jointly rather than in isolation, as high identity similarity alone does not guarantee realistic outputs. To make this trade off explicit, we report Face Image Quality (FIQ) as a complementary ratio based score that combines identity similarity and perceptual realism while keeping FS and FID as the primary metrics.

Evaluating camera image signal processing (ISP) pipelines requires measuring low-level artifacts introduced by operations such as denoising, demosaicing, tone mapping, and compression. Blind image quality assessment (IQA) techniques can grade visual quality without a reference, but they typically focus on semantic and high-level visual cues or human perceptual scores rather than the low-level image-processing artifacts introduced by camera pipelines. In contrast, full-reference metrics such as PSNR and SSIM measure pixel-level differences and structural similarity, while LPIPS measures perceptual similarity in deep feature space. However, these metrics require perfectly aligned image pairs, which are difficult to collect in practical settings. We propose a reference-free learning framework that estimates full-reference image quality metrics from a processed sRGB image and its ISO metadata. Our method predicts a proxy sRGB reference, which is then compared with the processed image to compute PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS in their standard full-reference form. Our experiments show that the proxy-reference model can be learned from synthetic data and applied to real camera data. We further show that lightweight LoRA fine-tuning enables efficient adaptation when ISP components or pipeline configurations are changed. The proposed method outperforms direct metric regression in estimating metric values and achieves higher agreement with full-reference rankings than conventional blind IQA methods. These results demonstrate the feasibility of reference-free estimation of full-reference metrics for practical camera-pipeline evaluation.

Recent advances in conventional and learning-based image coding have increased the demand for benchmark datasets that support fine-grained assessment of compressed image quality, particularly for learning-based image compression methods. This paper introduces Assessment of Image Coding 2026 (AIC2026), a large-scale dataset for high-fidelity image compression containing 70 source images selected from 2,787 candidates using semantic clustering, inter-metric disagreement among objective image quality assessment (IQA) methods, and manual inspection and refinement. The dataset covers a wide range of compression artifacts produced by eight conventional and four learning-based codecs across 17 coding configurations. Each source image is encoded using seven codecs. For each source-codec pair, decoded images are provided at 20 perceptually spaced distortion levels, corresponding approximately to 0.2-4.0 just-noticeable difference (JND) units using the ColorVideoVDP (CVVDP) metric for distortion estimation, yielding 9,618 distorted images. This fine-grained sampling enables analysis of rate-distortion behavior and objective metric evaluation for subtle quality differences across a wide range of compression artifacts. We report an extensive objective analysis using 24 conventional and 12 learning-based IQA methods. The results show substantial disagreement among current IQA methods for fine-grained quality differences, particularly for artifacts introduced by learning-based codecs. The complete dataset is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.18419/DARUS-6156.

Face Image Quality Assessment (FIQA) aims to estimate the utility of facial images for reliable recognition. The evaluation of FIQA methods is predominantly based on the Error-versus-Discard Characteristic (EDC), which evaluates performance by progressively discarding low-quality samples and measuring recognition error on the retained subset. In this work, we demonstrate that the widely used EDC protocol has fundamental limitations: Test-Set Divergence and Threshold Drift, which together limit the reliability and comparability of FIQA methods. To address this, we propose discard-based EDC variants and a rank-based Rank Consistency Evaluation (RCE) metric that operates on the entire test set without discarding samples, using a fixed decision threshold. Extensive experiments on five datasets, four face recognition models, and 15 state-of-the-art FIQA methods demonstrate both the limitations of EDC and the effectiveness of the proposed approaches in enabling a more reliable and comparable evaluation. Despite evaluated on face images only, the limitations arise from the EDC protocol rather than the biometric modality, suggesting a broader applicability to biometric quality assessment in general.

Virtual reality (VR) headsets (e.g., Meta Quest, Apple Vision Pro) provide a seamless user experience due to their fast, frictionless interaction with the physical world in a simulated environment. User authentication relies on biometric cues such as iris in such headsets. However, traditional iris recognition protocols may not be adequate in cases of unconstrained acquisition, which is typical of VR-based data. In this work, we examine three crucial aspects: (1) evaluating ISO/IEC 29794-6 iris quality metrics on VRBiom dataset and analyzing their limitations, (2) addressing data-specific challenges such as off-axis gaze, non-uniform illumination, and specular reflection using generative models, and (3) performing unimodal (iris, periocular) recognition and multimodal score-level fusion (iris + periocular). We observe that some metrics (e.g., margin adequacy) fail on VR-acquired data; whereas, image adjustments primarily benefit periocular recognition, and multimodal fusion lowers EER by ~11% over unimodal iris recognition performance. We will release the evaluation scripts upon acceptance for reproducibility.

Deep gaze estimation works well in controlled capture but degrades in unconstrained settings, where systems must reject unreliable predictions. Single-pass uncertainty (e.g., heteroscedastic regression) infers uncertainty from pixels without explicit input-validity cues, while sampling based methods are often too costly for real time use. We propose Factor-Informed Uncertainty Distillation (FIUD), a teacher-student framework that aligns uncertainty with interpretable image-quality failure modes. A gradient-boosting teacher predicts expected gaze error from factors such as illumination, sharpness, eye visibility and symmetry; a neural student distills these signals via curriculum learning and ranking supervision into a lightweight single-pass uncertainty head. Across ETH-XGaze, Gaze360, and MPIIFaceGaze (>300k samples), FIUD improves uncertainty, error rank correlation and selective prediction versus deterministic and sampling-based baselines, with the largest gains in unconstrained settings.

Image Quality Assessment (IQA) in open-world environments remains challenging due to limited generalization and interpretability. Recent approaches based on multimodal large language models (MLLMs) introduce textual reasoning for quality prediction, yet their judgments rely heavily on semantically biased internal representations, making them insensitive to low-level perceptual degradations. We propose IQA-T1, a tool-based visual evidence reasoning framework that augments MLLM reasoning with explicit perceptual observations. During inference, the model autonomously invokes specialized analysis tools to generate structured visual evidence, such as noise residual maps, gradient statistics, and frequency spectra, which are progressively integrated into the reasoning process. To support this paradigm, we construct Q-Tool, a dataset containing 11k multimodal reasoning chains grounded in tool-generated evidence. Extensive experiments on seven IQA benchmarks show that IQA-T1 achieves the best overall performance across datasets while producing interpretable and evidence-grounded quality assessments. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/zibuyu-02/IQA-T1.

Filtering noise is a fundamental part of data preparation that enhances image quality for applications such as object segmentation, detection, and recognition. Various noise reduction techniques are proposed in the literature, including the use of median, Gaussian, and bilateral filters. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have gained popularity in image denoising owing to their ability to extract complex patterns and features from data. CNNs are highly adaptable, making them effective tools for various image-denoising tasks. One drawback of CNN-based techniques is that they require an appropriate training dataset and all images to be resized. Another notable drawback of all these filtering techniques is that they work for certain types of environmental and camera noises. To bridge this research gap, in this paper, for the first time, instead of denoising, we propose an approach that filters out poor-quality images for various environmental and camera impacts. In our approach, quality is assessed using an image quality assessment metric and an optimum threshold is used to filter out poor-quality images. We also ensure that a sufficient number of images remain to develop the deep learning (DL) model. The results produced using real and simulated traffic and object recognition data demonstrate the performance supremacy of the proposed approach compared with the state-of-the-art approaches. The average recognition accuracy for our proposed approach is 93.8% for the traffic sign recognition dataset and 84.9% for the object recognition dataset. This indicates our model's potential for real-life applications such as autonomous vehicles.

While diffusion models achieve state-of-the-art image quality for text-to-image (T2I) generation, recent work has demonstrated that they suffer from sample diversity collapse. In this work, we investigate whether autoregressive (AR) image generation models can push the Pareto frontier between image quality and sample diversity. With recent advances in quality and efficiency, AR models have emerged as a viable alternative to diffusion-based image generation. Beyond enabling new use cases such as interleaved image-text generation, their sequential generation process makes them compatible with a wide range of token-based decoding strategies originally developed to improve diversity in text generation. Motivated by the potential of a better diversity-quality tradeoff in the AR paradigm, we present the first systematic study of sample diversity in AR image generation models. We show that two key properties of AR image generation, persistently high token-level entropy and substantial redundancy in visual token spaces, limit the effectiveness of existing token-level decoding methods for diversity enhancement. We therefore propose $p$-less cluster, a new decoding strategy that performs entropy-based truncation sampling at cluster level rather than at token level. We evaluate our approach and baseline decoding methods across four autoregressive T2I models and two datasets using a comprehensive suite of metrics spanning image quality, prompt alignment, and diversity. Our results show that $p$-less cluster unlocks the greatest diversity across most evaluated autoregressive T2I models and datasets while maintaining image quality and prompt alignment.

Accurate poverty mapping using satellite imagery is often hindered by (i) noisy and sparse survey-derived supervision, (ii) image quality issues such as cloud cover and image corruption, and (iii) lack of explicit spatial structure in image-only models. Building on the KidSat framework, we develop an enhanced pipeline that improves predictive accuracy via refined data preprocessing, systematic image quality assessment, and mathematically defined geographic encoding. First, we refine the fine-tuning target matrix by resolving high-cardinality sparsity and reducing one-hot dimensionality from 103 to 51 via DHS re-aggregation. Second, we introduce a simple two-stage quality-screening procedure to filter heavily clouded or corrupted observations. Third, we fuse DINOv2 visual embeddings with Spherical Harmonics (SH) location features. Across extensive experiments, these changes reduce MAE from 0.2167 to 0.1759, corresponding to an 18.83% relative reduction on the cluster-level severe-deprivation proportion scale. When extended from 16 to 33 African countries, the best-performing configuration achieves an overall MAE of 0.1658. We find that SH features consistently improve performance over the image-only backbone, whereas higher-capacity coordinate Multi Layer Perception augmentation (SH+SIREN) can underperform without carefully designed objectives. Finally, gradient-boosted tree heads (XGBoost/LightGBM) most effectively exploit nonlinear interactions in the fused visual-geographic representation. These findings provide a scalable and principled recipe for improving satellite-based socioeconomic predictions using only publicly accessible data.

With the rapid advancement of image generation technologies, perceptual quality assessment of AI-generated images has emerged as a crucial research direction in computer vision. The core challenge of this task lies in achieving efficient quality assessment for massive generated images. Current mainstream approaches exhibit two key limitations: 1) Methods employing complex feature extraction strategies, while improving performance, incur prohibitive computational costs that hinder real-time inference; 2) Simple image scaling-based solutions, despite their computational efficiency, demonstrate significantly inferior assessment accuracy. To address this critical issue, we propose Patch Knowledge Transfer (PKT), a knowledge distillation-based optimization framework that achieves synergistic optimization of visual representation capability and inference efficiency through an innovative multi-level knowledge transfer mechanism. Specifically, we design a dual-model architecture: a teacher model with local-global hybrid processing provides high-quality supervision signals, while a student model relying solely on global processing efficiently inherits the teacher's representation capacity through multi-level supervision. Extensive experiments conducted on 4 AIGIQA databases demonstrate that the PKT framework enables the student model to maintain performance comparable to the teacher while reducing computational costs by 67.7%. Furthermore, compared to existing methods, our approach achieves a superior balance between model efficiency and assessment accuracy.

Video quality assessment (VQA) plays a critical role in optimizing video delivery systems. While numerous objective metrics have been proposed to approximate human perception, the perceived quality strongly depends on viewing conditions and display characteristics. Factors such as ambient lighting, display brightness, and resolution significantly influence the visibility of distortions. In this work, we address the question of the multi-screen quality assessment on mobile devices, as this area still tends to be under-covered. We introduce a first large-scale subjective dataset collected across more than different 300 Android devices, accompanied by metadata on viewing conditions and display properties. We propose a strategy for aggregated score extraction and adaptation of VQA models to device-specific quality estimation. Our results demonstrate that incorporating device and context information enables more accurate and flexible quality prediction, offering new opportunities for fine-grained optimization in streaming services. Ultimately, this work advances the development of perceptual quality models that bridge the gap between laboratory evaluations and the diverse conditions of real-world media consumption. We made the dataset and the code available at https://videoprocessing.github.io/device-viewing-conditions.

Benchmarking immersive media coding solutions, especially in the standardization context, requires reliable and reproducible subjective quality assessment (QA) procedures, along with objective quality metrics that remain accurate across different distortion types. This paper presents a standardized workflow for light field QA, developed and deployed in the context of JPEG Pleno standardization activities, which integrates benchmark generation, a hybrid subjective evaluation, and objective metric analysis into a common workflow. The benchmark is designed to encompass not only traditional coding-only artifacts but also distortions that arise in processing pipelines in which light field encoding is accompanied with view synthesis and reconstruction techniques. A hybrid subjective method is proposed enabling fine-grained assessment by combining reference-anchored quality rating with targeted pairwise refinement in perceptually ambiguous regions. The reliability of subjective scores is verified using statistical consistency analyses between observers of two cohorts. Finally, a large set of objective metrics is systematically evaluated in terms of global prediction accuracy, local agreement in ambiguous quality regions, and robustness across distortion families. The results show that several metrics achieve strong agreement for coding-only stimuli, but their performance consistently drops when view synthesis distortions are included. The analysis further highlights the importance of view-pooling strategy in the design of future light field quality metrics. The work provides a reproducible and standardization-ready framework for fine-grained light field QA, while identifying key limitations of current objective metrics under emerging coding pipelines. The subjectively annotated dataset is publicly available at https://plenodb.jpeg.org/lfqa/objectivecfp.

Text-to-image diffusion models power everyday creative tasks, but they still reproduce the demographic biases in their training data. On common prompts such as a photo of a nurse,'' a photo of a CEO'', they skew their outputs toward one gender, driven by the statistics of training data rather than anything in the text. Existing debiasing methods show promise in narrow settings but require retraining, batch-level control, or prompt-specific tuning, limiting their scalability. We propose \emph{EquiSteer}, a training-free method that works per sample by steering cross-attention (CA) activations at inference time. For each target attribute, EquiSteer precomputes steering vectors from contrastive prompts. Then at generation time, a prompt-aware gate leaves attribute-specific prompts untouched, while for neutral ones it clears existing attribute signals from the CA activations and injects a target attribute. Across SD-1.5, SD-2.1, SDXL, and SANA, EquiSteer reduces the average parity gap by up to $87\%$, with minimal effect on image quality and text-image alignment. Code is available at \href{https://github.com/Atmyre/EquiSteer}{https://github.com/Atmyre/EquiSteer}.%

We present DroneIQA-VLE, our solution to the ICME 2026 Drone-IQA Grand Challenge on Target-aware Image Quality Assessment for Low-altitude UAV Images. The framework jointly predicts global, target, and background quality scores by ensembling two complementary pipelines: (1) SigLIP2 vision encoders with multi-task regression heads, and (2) a LoRA-adapted Qwen3.5-9B multimodal large language model for quality score regression. The final global quality prediction is obtained by arithmetically averaging the outputs of both pipelines. Our method achieves 2nd place in the challenge, demonstrating its effectiveness. The code is available at https://github.com/sunwei925/DroneIQA-VLE.

Existing smartphone image quality assessment (IQA) methods commonly reduce perceptual quality to a single score. However, this scalar formulation is poorly aligned with practical image signal processor (ISP) tuning, where engineers must identify specific quality issues, estimate their severities, and determine whether they are acceptable or require intervention. In this work, we introduce a Practical ISP-aware Structured Model for IQA (PrISM-IQA), which reformulates smartphone IQA as a multi-issue ordinal diagnosis problem. Rather than regressing a single quality score, PrISM-IQA predicts an \textit{ordered} severity level -- absent, minor, severe, or critical -- for each ISP-relevant issue, covering both global image-level artifacts and local content-dependent defects. To produce logically consistent predictions, PrISM-IQA combines cumulative ordinal encoding with structured inference that captures within-issue monotonicity as well as cross-issue subsumption and exclusion relations. We evaluate PrISM-IQA on a reconstructed SPAQ benchmark annotated with $53$ ISP-relevant quality issues and on a small-scale expert-annotated real-world dataset. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of PrISM-IQA for practical issue-level diagnosis, reveal transferable perceptual quality representations through linear probing, and further show how its predictions can support actionable and meaningful ISP tuning.

Modern text-to-image diffusion models, such as diffusion transformers (DiT), rely on timestep or prompt embeddings to modulate the strength of the denoising process in each timestep. While this modulation communicates the current noise level, it does not provide any quality-aware information, which can lead to generated images that are unaligned, visually inconsistent, and lacking in fidelity. In this paper, we propose the Quality Representation Module (QRM), a lightweight transformer module that learns a quality-aware representation based on existing model inputs, and produces a set of vectors $M_{qrm}$. These vectors adjust the adaptive LayerNorm modulation within the DiT transformer blocks, thereby injecting a quality-sensitive signal into the denoising parameters. The QRM introduces no significant changes to the sampling schedule or diffusion backbone. Experiments include ablations on QRM training losses and architectures, as well as empirical results demonstrating consistent image quality improvements over baseline DiT-based models.

Blind image quality assessment (BIQA) is commonly built on two basic learning paradigms: regression and ranking. Regression calibrates absolute scores, whereas ranking recovers quality structure from ordinal relations. Although joint regression-ranking supervision often improves BIQA, the relation between the two paradigms remains largely empirical and underexplored. In this work, we revisit what underlies regression and ranking and identify pairwise relational distance, termed quality margin, as their common bridge. Our derivation shows that, at the objective-optimization level, both paradigms fit quality margins: regression fits margins induced by score endpoints, while ranking fits transformed or sign-level margins through preference probabilities. Motivated by this insight, we propose MR-IQA, a direct quality-margin optimization framework for reinforcement learning (RL)-based BIQA. MR-IQA samples quality scores and optimizes pairwise margin errors as policy rewards, thereby modeling quality structure more explicitly. Experiments on six BIQA benchmarks show competitive general performance, and controlled comparisons demonstrate that MR-IQA achieves the strongest average PLCC/SRCC over regression- or ranking-based RL methods. Our findings provide a new insight into unifying regression and ranking, offering a theoretical basis for understanding quality-structure modeling in BIQA and beyond. Code is available at https://github.com/RobinY99/MR-IQA.

Low-light image enhancement algorithms (LIEAs) aim to improve the visibility of images captured under poor illumination. However, the enhancement process often introduces artifacts such as noise amplification, color shift, structural damage, and over-exposure, which degrade the perceptual quality of the enhanced images. Therefore, a reliable image quality assessment (IQA) metric for evaluating enhancement effects is of great importance for both the development of LIEAs and their practical applications. In this paper, we present \textbf{LEIQ-Assessor}, a multi-dimensional quality assessment model for low-light image enhancement based on multi-task learning, developed for the QoMEX 2026 Grand Challenge on Low-light Enhanced Image Quality Assessment. Specifically, our method leverages a pre-trained SigLIP2 Vision Transformer as the backbone and simultaneously predicts the overall Mean Opinion Score (MOS) together with six perceptual sub-attributes: lightness, color fidelity, noise level, exposure quality, naturalness, and content recovery. By jointly optimizing these correlated objectives via the PLCC loss, the shared representation captures richer quality-aware features than its single-task counterpart. Experiments on the MLE benchmark demonstrate that LEIQ-Assessor significantly outperforms existing no-reference IQA models and hand-crafted quality descriptors. Our method achieved second place in the QoMEX 2026 Grand Challenge on Low-light Enhanced Image Quality Assessment. The code is available at https://github.com/sunwei925/LEIQ-Assessor.

Self-supervised learning (SSL) currently drives state-of-the-art performance in no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA). However, standard SSL pipelines uniformly apply synthetic distortions across the entire image field, which can limit their sensitivity to spatially localized and co-occurring degradations encountered in real-world content. In this work, we empirically expose this representational blind spot across existing state-of-the-art encoders, demonstrating their reduced sensitivity to spatially bounded image degradations. To bridge this gap, we introduce Spatial Localized Image Degradation Embeddings for Image Quality Assessment (SLIDE-IQA). SLIDE-IQA employs a dual-branch Vision Transformer framework that injects spatially bounded degradations into a contrastive pretraining objective. To handle the spatial complexity of these degradations, we introduce a Threshold-Bounded Exclusion Mechanism, a representational design choice that resolves structural conflicts arising from spatially localized distortions to ensure the latent space respects both degradation type and spatial scale. Finally, we show that SLIDE-IQA's synthetic-only pretraining significantly improves sensitivity to localized distortions, while achieving competitive performance on NR-IQA benchmarks against existing SSL NR-IQA models.

Continuous-recording surveillance systems face a storage problem that codec tuning alone cannot fully solve: even at aggressive CRF settings, a static-camera scene spends most of its bits re-encoding a background that has not changed. We present BLUE, a pre-encode compositor that exploits this structure by maintaining a persistent seed frame of the background and substituting background pixels with seed pixels before the encoder runs. The encoder then emits near-free SKIP macroblocks for the frozen background, while live pixels in foreground regions are carried unchanged at full quality. We evaluate BLUE on all 308 annotated short subclips from the VIRAT Ground Surveillance Release 2.0 dataset using a six-point CRF sweep with both x264 and x265. At CRF 28, BLUE reduces file size by a mean of 34.6% (x264) / 39.4% (x265) on 95.8% / 99.4% of clips respectively. Foreground-region PSNR, computed only over VIRAT object-annotation bounding boxes, is preserved or improved on 60.7% of clips (+0.36 dB mean, +5.48 dB maximum). Full-frame perceptual quality (VMAF) drops by a median of 6.75-8.59 points; we quantify and disclose this trade-off explicitly. A lightweight deployment gate measuring the compositor's own VMAF on a 2-second prefix identifies the 40% of clips where even full-frame quality degradation is near-imperceptible (Delta VMAF <= -2.9), enabling a selective-activation strategy that retains both the storage benefit and acceptable perceptual fidelity.

This paper describes our submission to the IWSLT 2026 Instruction Following shared task. SpeechLLMs are developed for both short-form and long-form speech instruction following under constrained settings. For the short track, strong performance is achieved on MCIF, with a SIFS score of 2.0708. For the long track, three speech segmentation methods are explored, and the HIFS score is introduced to account for unstable long-form generation. Experimental results show that fixed 30-second segmentation provides the most robust long-form performance, achieving the highest HIFS score of 2.0663. Further analysis shows that hallucination mainly manifests as repetitive insertions in generated outputs, substantially affecting ASR and SSUM, while short-form capabilities are largely retained after long-form extension.

Color fundus photography (CFP) is the most common ophthalmic imaging modality for large-scale screening. However, it is highly susceptible to degradations, making robust fundus image quality assessment (FIQA) crucial. The criteria for what constitutes high-quality at the image level vary across clinical tasks, making FIQA dependent on expert knowledge. This motivated the development of automated methods and datasets. While existing datasets aim to standardize image-level quality, their criteria often differ. Furthermore, image-level labels preclude the quantitative evaluation of localized degradations, which is essential for trustworthy FIQA. We argue that pixel-level FIQA based on anatomical visibility represents a more task-agnostic, explainable approach. In this work, we introduce FunPiQ, the first FIQA benchmark to provide pixel-level quality annotations. In addition, we propose EFIQA-CP, an explainable-by-design (EBD) method that uses quality pseudo-labels based on anatomical visibility to train a CNN via Non-Negative Positive-Unlabeled learning. Extensive evaluations of classification methods with post-hoc explanations, anomaly detection methods, and EBD methods demonstrate the superior performance of the last and, particularly, of EFIQA-CP.

Production vision pipelines silently degrade on blurry input, wasting compute on downstream OCR, retrieval, and vision-language model (VLM) calls that cannot recover a usable output. We present MagikaDocumentFromPixel, a lightweight, CPU-friendly image quality gate that classifies a single image as sharp, blurred, or uncertain in roughly 7 ms on a single CPU core. The contributions are (i) a recipe selected from a 46-configuration, 8-sweep empirical search that isolates input resolution as the dominant lever and shows architecture capacity only pays off at >= 384 px; (ii) a confidence-aware routing formalism grounded in classical selective prediction; (iii) the Edge Prior Module (EPM), a Laplacian-magnitude auxiliary input channel that gives the network direct access to the spectral evidence that classical blur heuristics rely on and that lifts test F1 by +1.3 points in a matched-env comparison; and (iv) an observation that the gate is one instance of a recurring design pattern that appears independently in Magika content-type detection, risk-controlled OCR with VLMs, and DocVLM. The final recipe MobileNetV3-Large with the EPM trained at 384x384 on paired GoPro Large frames, evaluated with 5-scale test-time augmentation reaches F1 = 0.9803 (AUC 0.9989) with a 17 MB ONNX artifact, improving over our fixed-scale baseline on the same hardware (F1 = 0.9672) by +1.31 points. We are explicit about limitations: results are on a single motion-blur distribution, numbers are from a single seed, and calibration is qualitative rather than measured.

Image quality control is vital for a wide range of downstream applications. Deep learning-based image quality assessment methods typically train classifiers on dataset-specific quality labels, inheriting two limitations: (1) generalization is tied to the labeling criteria of the training set and (2) these methods cannot provide spatial feedback on where the quality is degraded, lacking explainability. In this work, we propose EFIQA, a framework that requires no quality-related supervision and produces spatial quality maps by design. Rather than learning what is degradation" from human-annotated labels, EFIQA learns what should be there" by leveraging anatomical priors. For fundus photography, we instantiate this as a two-stage approach, by first training an unsupervised anomaly detector via masked anatomical inpainting to identify regions of missing vasculature, and then distilling this prior knowledge into a shallow adapter mapping features of a frozen foundation model to precise quality maps. External-dataset evaluation demonstrates that this label-free approach with minimal adaptation achieves better performance and explainability compared with supervised methods across benchmarks with different quality criteria, highlighting its potential for real-world applications.

Clinical prostate multi-parametric MRI relies heavily on high-quality diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), yet reading DWI is frequently compromised by geometric distortion, often caused by rectal air. Assessing quality via the PI-QUAL scoring system is an emerging clinical standard, but it is subjective, time-consuming and suffers from a class imbalance where low-quality cases are diverse and relatively scarce. Using the PRIME clinical trial as an example, there are $6\%$ images with PI-QUAL scores lower than 4, $87\%$ of DWI issues are due to distortion. Many of the other clinical quality issues are under-represented. To address this common dual-scarcity of annotated clinical data, we propose a few-shot biparametric prototypical network for automated image quality assessment (IQA). Our framework utilizes a dual-branch 3D ResNet to fuse T2-weighted and DWI features, providing anatomical context to distinguish true morphology from distortion. To handle real-world heterogeneity, we introduce feature-wise linear modulation (FiLM) and a gradient reversal layer (GRL) to align feature distributions conditioned on varying b-values while suppressing acquisition-related biases. We demonstrate that a model meta-trained solely on comparatively objective, readily obtainable distortion labels can effectively adapt to predicting complex, multi-factorial clinical quality scores such as PI-QUAL using only five representative samples. Experimental results on two datasets show that our method significantly outperforms few-shot learning baselines for this challenging IQA task, offering a practically feasible and data-efficient solution for standardizing prostate MRI quality control in clinical workflows.

Single-shot echo-planar prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is frequently complicated by geometric distortions, which impact the ability to derive reliable diagnoses from such images. Developing automated correction methods is challenged by the absence of paired distorted and undistorted clinical scans. In this paper, we first propose a novel weakly-supervised image quality transfer (IQT) framework from undistorted to distorted images that utilizes image quality assessment (IQA) signals to supervise the transfer process. Unlike traditional methods that require expensive, voxel-wise paired data or resort to developing unpaired algorithms, our approach utilizes image-level quality labels (here, distorted vs. undistorted) to establish latent quality prototypes within a pre-trained feature space. Recognizing that simulating realistic distortions is more reliable than direct unpaired correction, we describe a weakly-supervised prototype flow matching algorithm to explicitly regularize generative trajectories towards distorted prototypes, producing realistic susceptibility artifacts that mimic clinical degradations. By synthesizing these realistic pairs, we enable a second IQT model to be trained in the forward direction for distortion correction. Experimental results demonstrate that our generated images successfully mimic the diagnostic interference of real-world artifacts, which leads to more capable distortion correction IQT models. In addition to qualitative comparisons, we also conduct exhaustive quantitative evaluations that compare our approach with existing unpaired approaches (e.g., CycleGAN, UNIT-DDPM, and OT-FM) - as either forward or reverse alternatives - by assessing clinical downstream task performance in PI-RADS and Gleason score classification, using both in-distribution and external data sets.

Existing vision-language model (VLM)-based AI-generated image quality assessment (AIGIQA) methods suffer from a fundamental semantic-distortion dimensional conflict: monolithic representations optimized for semantic discrimination inherently entangle compositional understanding with low-level perceptual sensitivity, rendering them blind to fine-grained quality degradations. We introduce MST-CLIPIQA, a multi-scale two-stream framework that achieves hierarchical vision-language alignment through explicit representational decoupling. Our architecture leverages dual CLIP encoders with complementary patch granularities: coarse-grained streams capture global semantic coherence while fine-grained streams preserve textural signatures and artifact patterns. An information bottleneck-inspired gated fusion mechanism performs adaptive cross-scale distillation, with optional cross-attention enabling prompt-anchored correspondence evaluation when generation prompts are available. Extensive experiments across five benchmarks establish new state-of-the-art results, achieving average improvements of 1.11 percent SRCC on quality and 2.35 percent SRCC on text-image correspondence prediction, while maintaining efficiency with only 0.8M trainable parameters. Our project is available at https://github.com/YMlinfeng/MST-CLIPIQA.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been increasingly adopted for Image Quality Assessment (IQA). However, current methods typically employ a static one-shot scoring paradigm, despite the fact that humans assess image quality through dynamic visual inspection, e.g., selectively adjusting views to verify details and subtle artifacts. Specifically, relying solely on a single-pass observation introduces two primary limitations: first, perceiving the image only at a global scale restricts the assessment of finer local details; second, the original intensity distribution of the image may overwhelm the visibility, leading to insufficient inspection of image quality. To address these issues, we propose Tool-IQA, shifting the assessment mechanism from passive scoring to a tool-augmented workflow. In particular, we equip VLMs with simple yet effective view tools: a Magnifier to inspect local details, and a Gamma Corrector to uncover visibility and hidden artifacts. The assessment follows a structured pipeline that consists of an initial observation with rubric notes, a tool-augmented in-depth inspection, and a final quantification for calibrated quality score. Furthermore, to ensure efficient and purposeful tool callings, we introduce a batch-aware training strategy to reward tool interactions that can yield positive contributions rather than simply encouraging usage. Experiments on a variety of IQA benchmarks demonstrate that, with effective tool calling and calibrated assessment, our proposed Tool-IQA significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art models, e.g., it achieves a PLCC of 0.854 on the challenging CLIVE dataset.

In recent years, there have been notable advancements in the area of instruction-based image editing (IIE), which focuses on the automatic alteration of input images using a model. Nevertheless, assessing the effectiveness of these editing models poses a considerable challenge due to the intricate nature of instructions and the wide variety of edits. To tackle this problem, one urgent task in this domain is the development of a robust evaluation framework that can precisely gauge the quality of editing outcomes and offer valuable benchmarks to guide future improvements. To address this challenge, we present a comprehensive evaluation benchmark named I2EBench2.0, designed for single-round and multi-round assessment of IIE models. I2EBench2.0 has four key features: 1) Evaluation Across Single and Multi-rounds: I2EBench2.0 simultaneously evaluates both single-round and multi-round instruction-based edits, assessing the precision and consistency of the edits. 2) Extensive Evaluation Criteria: I2EBench2.0 encompasses a broad range of criteria, evaluating both high-level and low-level aspects of each IIE model. Specifically, it incorporates 16 dimensions for single-round evaluations and 7 for multi-round evaluations. 3) Alignment with Human Judgment: To ensure our benchmark aligns with human evaluation, we conducted a comprehensive user study for each criterion. 4) Research-driven Insights: By analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of current IIE models across all 16 single-round and 7 multi-round dimensions, we provide critical insights aimed at directing future research in this area. We tested eight recently developed IIE models using I2EBench2.0 and derived academic insights through meticulous comparison and analysis. The related code, dataset, and images generated by all IIE models are available on GitHub: https://github.com/cocoshe/I2EBench.

This paper addresses the challenge of assessing image quality in ID cards in remote verification systems by applying capture-related quality measures from the Open Face Image Quality (OFIQ) standard to ID card images. Our preprocessing pipeline includes corner detection, perspective normalization, and comprehensive foreground masking to ensure accurate and unbiased quality measure computation. We evaluate the effectiveness of these measures by analyzing their correlation with the performance of three presentation attack detection (PAD) algorithms across four diverse ID card datasets, where two datasets contain bona fide, i.e. pristine, images and two contain printed mock ID cards. Our results suggest that quality assessment based on some OFIQ measures can significantly improve PAD performance.

In abdominal CT imaging, developing a low-dose, no-reference image quality assessment (No-reference IQA) model that mimics doctors' reading habits for evaluating CT image quality has significant practical value. This paper proposes a novel deep learning-based framework, ClinReadNet, whose design aligns with the clinical reading logic of radiologists: first, it introduces the Sobel ordinal quality network (SOQN) module, which can simultaneously focus on edge details highly relevant to image quality and the quality distribution pattern of the entire image, accurately matching the clinical image-reading judgment habit of "considering both local details and overall context"; second, the framework integrates the (shifted) window multi-scale temperature multi-head self-attention ((S)W-MTMSA) module, which further replicates the radiologists' image-reading process of shifting from overall scanning to local focusing, and accurately locks in regions of interest through multi-sharpness attention; third, it designs the hierarchical ranked probability score (HRPS) loss function, which combines the dual logics of coarse classification and fine classification, while paying attention to the distance information between grading labels, effectively improving the performance of image quality assessment. Experiments conducted on the LDCTIQAG2023 dataset show that the proposed method achieves the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance: the values of Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (PLCC), Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient (SROCC), and Kendall's rank-order correlation coefficient (KROCC) reach 0.9507, 0.9554, and 0.8629 respectively, with the sum of their absolute values (Score) being 2.7690, outperforming existing methods.

Reliable evaluation of instance segmentation models requires metrics that accurately and consistently reflect segmentation quality. However, the metrics most widely used in biological imaging carry fundamental mathematical weaknesses: hard Intersection-over-Union (IoU) thresholds that produce discontinuous, low sensitivity scoring; per-object normalization that distorts scores under object size variation; and greedy or one-to-many matching procedures that yield non-optimal, order-dependent correspondences. Together, these properties produce unintuitive and unreliable model rankings under common failure modes such as split cells, merged cells, and cell boundary imprecision. We propose Maximum Matching Accuracy (MMA), a threshold-free continuous metric that finds a globally optimal one-to-one matching between predicted and ground truth objects and aggregates total overlap using per-pixel normalization. We evaluate MMA against AP@50, PQ, SEG, and AJI across three experiments: synthetic failure cases, progressive corruption tests, and a model ranking comparison. MMA produces scores that are more stable, more sensitive, and more interpretable than existing alternatives, providing a principled foundation for fair instance segmentation benchmarking in biological cell imaging.

Automated L2 speech assessment can assign proficiency labels, but often lacks interpretability. We propose a rubric-guided SpeechLLM for multi-aspect, multi-granular assessment, trained with a hybrid objective combining supervised fine-tuning and Bounded Direct Preference Optimization. The model jointly predicts ordinal labels at the sentence-level (accuracy, fluency, prosody), word/phoneme-level accuracy, and generates a natural-language rationale in the same response. On SpeechOcean762, our approach matches or outperforms single-granularity models while remaining competitive with prior approaches. We analyze rationale reliability along two axes: self-consistency with model predictions and alignment with ground-truth labels, using sentiment consistency (plausibility) and mention-based agreement (faithfulness). Rationales are plausible at the sentence level, but faithfulness degrades at the word/phoneme level: references are sparse and weakly aligned with token-level labels.