Iterative RAG

Modern information retrieval increasingly employs both embedding and generative models to handle complex queries. However, current serving systems suffer from low throughput and poor GPU utilization because they execute these models in isolation. Coarse-grained partitioning, such as dedicating GPUs to specific tasks, fails to adapt to dynamic workloads and creates computational "bubbles". To address these, we present Orthrus, a serving system that performs heterogeneous batching within a unified inference loop. The primary challenge lies in unifying embedding and generation workloads with conflicting computational patterns while optimizing batch composition for high performance. Orthrus addresses these challenges through chunked embedding with incremental pooling and by adjusting batch composition in a workload-aware manner. Evaluation on four A100 GPUs shows that, relative to baseline deployments, Orthrus achieves 1.28$\times$--4.52$\times$ higher throughput on controlled workloads and up to 55.8% lower end-to-end p99 latency on an iterative-RAG benchmark. We release our code at https://github.com/illinoisdata/Orthrus .

As Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) shifts toward diverse portfolio generation, it is stymied by two critical bottlenecks: flawed measurement of evidence utilization, and suboptimal context budget allocation. We resolve both sequentially. To resolve measurement, we expose a pervasive ``diagnostic illusion'': standard relevance proxies fail catastrophically on hard negatives. We replace them with an efficient causal leave-one-out probe that accurately isolates generative reliance and formally calibrates the structural dilution of LLM attention. To resolve allocation, we deploy this causal probe in a deconfounded factorial grid. We prove that the prevailing strategy of monolithic context widening is an architectural trap penalized by relevance decay. Instead, allocating compute iteratively across multiple sequential generations drives transformative portfolio recall gains of 16.7--20.5 absolute percentage points, scaling robustly up to 32B models. Finally, we unify these solutions into a deployable closed-loop submodular scheduler. Augmented by an attribution-steered contrastive decoder to override LLM attention inertia, our architecture systematically forces fresh evidence integration. By dominating classical open-loop baselines, we establish sequential, feedback-driven orchestration as the definitive paradigm for generative search. Our code, data, and causal measurement instruments are available at https://github.com/PeiYangLiu/ascp.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising performance across a wide range of biomedical applications, including medical question answering (QA), yet they remain prone to hallucinations and outdated knowledge. Although retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can alleviate this issue by incorporating external documents, there still exist two fundamental limitations. First, medical knowledge is often fragmented across documents, while most RAG methods rely on a single retrieval path, which makes it challenging to jointly preserve fine-grained semantic information and structured global associations. Second, static retrieval strategies are typically insufficient to support deep reasoning that is important in complex medical QA. In this paper, we present a dual-path retrieval framework with an iterative retrieval-reasoning mechanism termed "Hybrid-IR" for complex medical QA. The proposed Hybrid-IR integrates graph-based retrieval for exploration of structured knowledge and dense retrieval for fine-grained semantic matching. Moreover, the reasoning trajectory can be progressively refined through an iterative retrieve-reason loop. Experiments on three widely used medical QA benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our Hybrid-IR.

Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation (iRAG) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for answering complex multi-hop questions by progressively retrieving and reasoning over external documents. However, current systems predominantly operate on parsed text, which creates two critical bottlenecks: (1) Coarse-grained attribution, where users are burdened with manually locating evidence within lengthy documents based on vague text-level citations; and (2) Visual semantic loss, where the conversion of visually rich documents (e.g., slides, PDFs with charts) into text discards spatial logic and layout cues essential for reasoning. To bridge this gap, we present Chain of Evidence (CoE), a retriever-agnostic visual attribution framework that leverages Vision-Language Models to reason directly over screenshots of retrieved document candidates. CoE eliminates format-specific parsing and outputs precise bounding boxes, visualizing the complete reasoning chain within the retrieved candidate set. We evaluate CoE on two distinct benchmarks: Wiki-CoE, a large-scale dataset of structured web pages derived from 2WikiMultiHopQA, and SlideVQA, a challenging dataset of presentation slides featuring complex diagrams and free-form layouts. Experiments demonstrate that fine-tuned Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct achieves robust performance, significantly outperforming text-based baselines in scenarios requiring visual layout understanding, while establishing a retriever-agnostic solution for pixel-level interpretable iRAG. Our code is available at https://github.com/PeiYangLiu/CoE.git.

Medical retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems typically operate on text chunks extracted from biomedical literature, discarding the rich visual content (tables, figures, structured layouts) of original document pages. We propose MED-VRAG, an iterative multimodal RAG framework that retrieves and reasons over PMC document page images instead of OCR'd text. The system pairs ColQwen2.5 patch-level page embeddings with a sharded MapReduce LLM filter, scaling to ~350K pages while keeping Stage-1 retrieval under 30 ms via an offline coarse-to-fine index (C=8 centroids per page, ANN over centroids, exact two-way scoring on the top-R shortlist). A vision-language model (VLM) then iteratively refines its query and accumulates evidence in a memory bank across up to 3 reasoning rounds, with a single iteration costing ~15.9 s and the full three-round pipeline ~47.8 s on 4xA100. Across four medical QA benchmarks (MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, MMLU-Med), MEDVRAG reaches 78.6% average accuracy. Under controlled comparison with the same Qwen2.5-VL-32B backbone, retrieval contributes a +5.8 point gain over the no-retrieval baseline; we also note a +1.8 point edge over MedRAG + GPT-4 (76.8%), with the caveat that this is a cross-paper rather than head-to-head comparison. Ablations isolate +1.0 from page-image vs text-chunk retrieval, +1.5 from iteration, and +1.0 from the memory bank.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds language models in external evidence, but multi-hop question answering remains difficult because iterative pipelines must control what to retrieve next and when the available evidence is adequate. In practice, systems may answer from incomplete evidence chains, or they may accumulate redundant or distractor-heavy text that interferes with later retrieval and reasoning. We propose S2G-RAG (Structured Sufficiency and Gap-judging RAG), an iterative framework with an explicit controller, S2G-Judge. At each turn, S2G-Judge predicts whether the current evidence memory supports answering and, if not, outputs structured gap items that describe the missing information. These gap items are then mapped into the next retrieval query, producing stable multi-turn retrieval trajectories. To reduce noise accumulation, S2G-RAG maintains a sentence-level Evidence Context by extracting a compact set of relevant sentences from retrieved documents. Experiments on TriviaQA, HotpotQA, and 2WikiMultiHopQA show that S2G-RAG improves multi-hop QA performance and robustness under multi-turn retrieval. Furthermore, S2G-RAG can be integrated into existing RAG pipelines as a lightweight component, without modifying the search engine or retraining the generator.

Large language models (LLMs) remain brittle on multi-hop question answering (MHQA), where answering requires combining evidence across documents through retrieval and reasoning. Iterative retrieval systems can fail by locking onto an early low-recall trajectory and amplifying downstream errors, while planning-only approaches may produce static query sets that cannot adapt when intermediate evidence changes. We propose \textbf{Planned Active Retrieval and Reasoning RAG (PAR$^2$-RAG)}, a two-stage framework that separates coverage from commitment. PAR$^2$-RAG first performs breadth-first anchoring to build a high-recall evidence frontier, then applies depth-first refinement with evidence sufficiency control in an iterative loop. Across four MHQA benchmarks, PAR$^2$-RAG consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art baselines, compared with IRCoT, PAR$^2$-RAG achieves up to 23.5% higher accuracy, with retrieval gains of up to 10.5% in NDCG.

Recently, large language models (LLMs) have gained much attention for the emergence of human-comparable capabilities and huge potential. However, for open-domain implicit question-answering problems, LLMs may not be the ultimate solution due to the reasons of: 1) uncovered or out-of-date domain knowledge, 2) one-shot generation and hence restricted comprehensiveness. To this end, this work proposes a gradual knowledge excavation framework for open-domain complex question answering, where LLMs iteratively and actively acquire external information, and then reason based on acquired historical knowledge. Specifically, during each step of the solving process, the model selects an action to execute, such as querying external knowledge or performing a single logical reasoning step, to gradually progress toward a final answer. Our method can effectively leverage plug-and-play external knowledge and dynamically adjust the strategy for solving complex questions. Evaluated on the StrategyQA dataset, our method achieves 78.17% accuracy with less than 6% parameters of its competitors, setting new SOTA for ~10B-scale LLMs.

Recent literature highlights the potential of graph-based approaches within large language model (LLM) retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines for answering queries of varying complexity, particularly those that fall outside the LLM's prior knowledge. However, LLMs are prone to hallucination and often face technical limitations in handling contexts large enough to ground complex queries effectively. To address these challenges, we propose a novel iterative, feedback-driven GraphRAG architecture that leverages response quality assessment to iteratively refine outputs until a sound, well-grounded response is produced. Evaluating our approach with queries from the HotPotQA dataset, we demonstrate that this iterative RAG strategy yields responses with higher semantic quality and improved relevance compared to a single-shot baseline.

Enterprise software systems commonly expose functionality through relational databases and REST APIs, requiring users to understand schemas, endpoints, and parameters. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can support natural language interfaces by grounding large language models (LLMs) in enterprise-specific documentation. We evaluate three training-free RAG configurations - Standard RAG, Relevance Filtering RAG, and Iterative Retrieval RAG - for SQL query generation, REST API call generation, and a combined task requiring routing between both operation types. Using SAP Transactional Banking, we constructed an expert-reviewed dataset with mock execution screening and compared the configurations under database-only, API-only, and mixed-documentation settings. Without retrieval, exact match accuracy is 0% across all tasks, whereas retrieval achieves mock execution success of up to 79.30% and component match accuracy of up to 78.86%. In the combined task, Iterative Retrieval RAG achieves higher exact match accuracy than Standard RAG (10.29% vs. 7.45%), with similar mock execution success (68.93% vs. 67.10%). However, for REST API call generation under mixed documentation, Iterative Retrieval RAG achieves lower mock execution success than Standard RAG (50.53% vs. 75.79%). Overall, retrieval-control strategies show task- and metric-dependent behavior under mixed-documentation settings.