Life Cycle Assessment

The proliferation of generative and agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems has introduced computational demands whose environmental consequences are substantial yet underexamined. This paper examines the environmental footprint of modern AI systems across energy consumption, carbon emissions, water usage, and electronic waste over the full lifecycle of large language models, multimodal foundation models, and agentic workflows, from hardware fabrication and training through fine-tuning and inference to end-of-life disposal. This work provides a conceptual analysis, utilizing order-of-magnitude estimations based on published data, without conducting original physical measurements. We contribute a lifecycle taxonomy that crosses lifecycle phases with five impact dimensions and emission scopes; a Sustainability Assessment Framework for AI Systems (SAFIA) comprising nine indicators; a comparative analysis of traditional, generative, and agentic AI; seven open challenges; policy recommendations for regulators, cloud providers, hardware manufacturers, and AI developers; and a research roadmap to 2035. The analysis indicates that inference can rival or exceed training energy over a deployment lifetime, that agentic workflows can multiply the energy of equivalent single-pass inference by one to several orders of magnitude depending on the number of model and tool calls, that indirect water use and embodied carbon are systematically underreported, and that measurement tools, disclosure practices, and regulation have not kept pace with agentic deployment. These findings call for agent-aware energy measurement, lifecycle-based carbon and water accounting, and mandatory disclosure for large-scale AI training and deployment.

In an era defined by escalating climate change and the pervasive deployment of edge intelligence, the environmental cost of semiconductor manufacturing and operation has reached a critical threshold. As Deep Learning (DL) accelerators dominate System-on-Chip (SoC) die area, achieving true sustainability requires a paradigm shift from static worst-case efficiency to dynamic energy-proportionality. This paper introduces Eco-SoC, a highly scalable VLSI architecture co-designed specifically for sustainable artificial intelligence. We propose a hardware-level Dynamic Precision-Scaling Logic (DPSL) framework that adaptively modulates bit-width precision based on real-time activation sparsity, successfully reducing switching activity by up to 42% on a commercial 7nm FinFET process node. Furthermore, we transcend traditional Power-Performance-Area (PPA) metrics by providing a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) using the Architectural Carbon footprint Tool (ACT). Our synthesis demonstrates that Eco-SoC offsets its increased embodied carbon footprint (a marginal 4.8% area overhead) within 1.1 years of edge deployment. Finally, by introducing a thermal-aware power gating mechanism that mitigates localized hotspots, Eco-SoC doubles the projected Mean Time To Failure (MTTF) of the silicon, providing a tangible, scalable strategy for electronic waste (e-waste) mitigation in next-generation computing systems.

The interpretation phase of life cycle assessment often lacks structured mechanisms for translating quantified improvement opportunities addressing environmental hotspots into actionable strategic pathways under technological, social, and policy uncertainty. To overcome this limitation, this study introduces a perspective-conditioned retrieval-augmented generation framework for LCA interpretation, where a multi-perspective retrieval and controlled synthesis is incorporated in the artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted LCA. To operationalise large language models in LCA interpretation, a perspective fusion RAG architecture was developed, covering academic, industry, public discourse, and European union (EU) funding datasets. Our approach comprises three steps: (1) a scenario anchor defining system boundaries and decarbonization targets, (2) a set of perspective-specific micro-queries with constrained retrieval, and (3) a neutral synthesis step integrating only ledger-stored outputs without further retrieval. The framework is demonstrated through a hydrogen-enabled diesel reduction use case in an Italian apple production facility using GPT-5 nano as the reasoning model. Overall, the structured retrieval and constrained synthesis are designed to mitigate the risk of hallucination while preserving cross-domain diversity. The approach presented can support more disciplined translation of impact results into strategic pathways and opens up new avenues for the use of advanced AI tools in LCA studies, particularly those focused on technologies that could be deployed at scale. This proof-of-concept demonstrates how AI-assisted, evidence-grounded interpretation can support implementation-oriented decision-making beyond conventional LCA studies.

The environmental impact of training large language models (LLMs) is increasingly scrutinised, yet most published estimates focus on operational energy and disclose little about manufacturing (embodied) emissions, water consumption, or the underlying highperformance computing (HPC) infrastructure. We present a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the pre-training of Lucie 7B, an open-source multilingual Foundation Model developed by the OpenLLM-France consortium and trained on the NVIDIA H100 partition of the Jean Zay supercomputer operated by IDRIS (CNRS). The assessment is framed by the AFNOR SPEC 2314 "Frugal AI" reference and applies the Labos 1point5 methodology for greenhouse gas(GHG) accounting in computing. The study scope extends from data preparation to model validation, and integrates the full life cycle of the hardware infrastructure: manufacturing (including raw-material extraction), use (compute, temporary storage, system administration, cooling), and end-of-life. We report (i) an annual footprint of 417.5 tCO2eq for the Jean Zay H100 partition, split almost equally between manufacturing and operation; (ii) an effective intensity of 36.7 gCO2eq per H100 GPU-hour; (iii) a total training footprint of 21 tCO2eq for Lucie 7B (574 564 H100 GPU-hours), inclusive of amortised hardware manufacturing; (iv) on-site water consumption of approximately 76m3 for the training campaign and an annual Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE) of 0.07 L/kWh for IDRIS; (v) a heat-reuse factor (ERF) of 0.37 thanks to waste-heat recovery into the urban heating network. The study contributes one of the few publicly documented LCAs of an LLM training campaign that explicitly couples operational data with embodied emissions decomposed by subsystem (compute, storage, power chain, cooling), and discusses the implications for the design of frugal-by-construction AI systems in Europe.

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been accompanied by significant increases in computational and environmental costs, driven by large-scale investments in AI infrastructure, hardware, and software. In particular, graphics cards have become central to AI training, with frequent hardware updates required to meet escalating computational demands. However, the environmental damages of graphics cards production remain understudied. This study addresses this gap by estimating the environmental damages associated with graphics cards production over the past decade (2013-2025). We analyze trends in energy consumption, carbon emissions and resource depletion. We compile and provide a dataset documenting the environmental damages of NVIDIA workstation graphics cards production since 2013. Our analysis of this dataset reveals a steady increase in production-related impacts over the period. Our finding highlights the need for greater transparency in life-cycle data, a persistent challenge in AI environmental assessments. While operational efficiency improvements (e.g., energy-efficient training, carbon-aware computing) are often prioritized, our results underscore that production-related impacts are also escalating and cannot be overlooked. The AI community must move beyond incremental optimizations and confront the necessity of sufficiency. This shift may demand structural changes such as policy interventions, hardware design for longevity, and cultural shifts away from perpetual growth and increased performance.

Proper accounting of the energy requirements and environmental impact of artificial intelligence (AI) systems is necessary for researchers, developers, policy makers, and users to assess the barriers to building systems at scale. With the growing complexity of pipelines and underlying infrastructure needed to develop and deploy AI systems, previous approaches for evaluating AI efficiency which focus on the costs of a single training run or an individual inference prediction are no longer sufficient. In this position paper, we enunciate the need for applying life cycle assessment to evaluate the costs of the machine learning model development and deployment pipeline to properly account for the required resources and downstream impact. Life cycle assessments enable the incorporation of costs across the full life cycle of an AI system and its underlying infrastructure, from the embodied costs associated with the physical computing hardware through the operational costs in training and inference.

New multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) are continuously being trained and deployed, following rapid development cycles. This generative AI frenzy is driving steady increases in energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and a plethora of other environmental impacts linked to datacenter construction and hardware manufacturing. Mitigating the environmental consequences of GenAI remains challenging due to an overall lack of transparency by the main actors in the field. Even when the environmental impacts of specific models are mentioned, they are typically restricted to the carbon footprint of the final training run, omitting the research and development stages. In this work, we explore the impact of GenAI research through a fine-grained analysis of the compute spent to create Moshi, a 7B-parameter speech-text foundation model for real-time dialogue developed by Kyutai, a leading privately funded open science AI lab. For the first time, our study dives into the anatomy of compute-intensive MLLM research, quantifying the GPU-time invested in specific model components and training phases, as well as early experimental stages, failed training runs, debugging, and ablation studies. Additionally, we assess the environmental impacts of creating Moshi from beginning to end using a life cycle assessment methodology: we quantify energy and water consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and mineral resource depletion associated with the production and use of datacenter hardware. Our detailed analysis allows us to provide actionable guidelines to reduce compute usage and environmental impacts of MLLM research, paving the way for more sustainable AI research.

Chemicals are embedded in nearly every aspect of modern society, yet their production poses substantial sustainability concerns. Achieving a sustainable chemical industry requires detailed Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); however, current assessments face many unknowns due to limited, partly inconsistent, and untransparent data coverage since existing Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) databases account for only a tiny fraction of traded chemicals. Here, we introduce the Chemical RetrosYnthesiS for Transparent Assessment of Life-cycles (CRYSTAL) framework, which automatically generates consistent and transparent LCI data for organic chemicals based on their molecular structure using retrosynthesis and machine-learned gate-to-gate inventories. Using the predictive power of CRYSTAL, we create a consistent database for more than 70000 organic chemicals, comprising over 110000 transparent LCI datasets that quantify both feedstock and energy demands, together with associated auxiliary materials, biosphere flows, and waste flows. From this comprehensive database, we identify 50 key environmental hotspots driving high impacts of organic chemical production across multiple environmental categories and pivotal hub chemicals that are most critical for downstream chemical production. In providing this comprehensive data foundation, the CRYSTAL framework offers systematic guidance for targeted engineering and policy interventions. Its transparent, modular nature is designed to shift chemical LCA from a reliance on "unknown unknowns" to a collaboratively improvable mapping of "known unknowns".

Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into life cycle assessment (LCA) has accelerated in recent years, with numerous studies successfully adapting machine learning algorithms to support various stages of LCA. Despite this rapid development, comprehensive and broad synthesis of AI-LCA research remains limited. To address this gap, this study presents a detailed review of published work at the intersection of AI and LCA, leveraging large language models (LLMs) to identify current trends, emerging themes, and future directions. Our analyses reveal that as LCA research continues to expand, the adoption of AI technologies has grown dramatically, with a noticeable shift toward LLM-driven approaches, continued increases in ML applications, and statistically significant correlations between AI approaches and corresponding LCA stages. By integrating LLM-based text-mining methods with traditional literature review techniques, this study introduces a dynamic and effective framework capable of capturing both high-level research trends and nuanced conceptual patterns (themes) across the field. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the potential of LLM-assisted methodologies to support large-scale, reproducible reviews across broad research domains, while also evaluating pathways for computationally-efficient LCA in the context of rapidly developing AI technologies. In doing so, this work helps LCA practitioners incorporate state-of-the-art tools and timely insights into environmental assessments that can enhance the rigor and quality of sustainability-driven decisions and decision-making processes.

Recent Machine Learning (ML) approaches have shown increased performance on benchmarks at the cost of escalating compute demands. Hardware, algorithmic and carbon optimizations have been proposed to curb energy use and environmental impacts. We estimate the environmental impacts associated with training models documented in the Epoch AI database over the last decade, with a particular focus on impacts associated with Large Language Models and the hardware used to train them. We find that energy use and environmental impacts associated with training ML models have increased exponentially, even when considering impact reduction strategies such as using less carbon intensive electricity mixes or more efficient hardware. Optimization strategies do not mitigate the impacts induced by model training, suggesting rebound effect. We show that the impacts of hardware must be considered over the entire life cycle rather than the sole use phase in order to avoid impact shifting. Our study demonstrates that increasing efficiency alone does not ensure sustainability. There is an urgent need to systematically integrate environmental impacts in NLP evaluation practices to better inform the community and support the use of impact as a feature in research planning and decision making.