Loss of Plasticity

Despite many studies about causes and remedies of plasticity loss in Reinforcement Learning (RL) under continual task changes, no RL method has yet consistently achieved a good balance between adaptation and forgetting. Here we turn to an alternative optimization paradigm, neuroevolution (NE): algorithms that search directly in weight space through mutation and selection over a population of neural networks. Across a wide array of environments and environmental changes, with policies ranging from a few hundred parameters to million-parameter networks, we compare evolution strategies (ES) and genetic algorithms (GAs) against state-of-the-art continual RL variants and population-based RL. ES most consistently achieves a good stability-plasticity trade-off, while the GA is the most plastic method but forgets more than ES. To explain this, we study the return landscape around each method's solutions. ES finds the widest neighborhoods, i.e.\ regions of weight space in which perturbed policies still solve the task, and the size of the overlap between the neighborhoods of consecutive tasks correlates with a method's stability-plasticity trade-off. Rewarding behavioral diversity in a GA through novelty search makes the population even more plastic, at the cost of forgetting. Finally, symptoms of plasticity loss commonly reported in RL do not transfer to NE. Overall, these results establish NE as a competitive alternative to RL under continual task changes, and suggest that training under perturbations in weight space may be a useful mechanism for continual learning more broadly.

Modern language models are likely to be updated throughout their lifetime rather than trained once and frozen. Each update therefore participates in a recurring cycle: decide which experience to learn from, understand what that update changes, and remain capable of learning from what comes next. We show that these challenges are governed by the same evolving update--behavior interaction. We derive a token- and layer-wise decomposition of how learning from one token changes another prediction. By separating the softmax force, shared readout geometry, and residual connections, it exposes two interaction channels and yields a forward-computable approximation. Following this interaction through time reveals a unified picture of continual adaptation. Positive interaction identifies useful experience; negative interaction produces either concentrated collision or accumulated erosion; over longer horizons, updates reshape the shared geometry mediating future learning signals, reducing their transmission. These predictions lead to effective data selection, mechanism-specific controls for interference, and a readout-based diagnostic of future learnability whose degradation predicts the benefit of restoring the readout. Across models and training regimes, the same local interaction thus explains both what an update changes now and how learning today changes what can be learned tomorrow. This view connects data attribution, forgetting, and plasticity loss as distinct regimes of the same evolving learning dynamics.

Plasticity loss has emerged as a critical challenge in continual learning that significantly hinders the acquisition of sequential tasks. While optimizing activation designs offers a potential solution, current fixed-form functions suffer from an inherent spectral bias towards low-frequency variations, whereas learnable variants permit unconstrained updates that induce catastrophic forgetting. To address these limitations, we propose a novel learnable wavelet activation that decomposes the activation function into low-frequency and high-frequency components to explicitly counter spectral bias. Furthermore, we employ dynamic wavelet injection to adaptively enhance plasticity for new tasks, alongside a regularization strategy to ensure the stability of previous learned knowledge. Theoretically, we provide rigorous mathematical guarantees for the proposed framework, proving the structural necessity of the hybrid wavelet architecture for efficient $L^2$ approximation and demonstrating that the decoupled learning rate mechanism successfully restores network plasticity for high-frequency information. Additionally, we provide a formal derivation of the loss-driven injection trigger mechanism to precisely guide the injection. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate that our approach maintains superior trainability and generalization throughout the learning process and achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse continual learning benchmarks.

Neural networks that can grow or both grow and shrink during learning, referred to as growing neural networks and elastic neural networks, respectively, have recently been explored in offline continual learning with a particular focus on catastrophic forgetting. Driven by the observations that 1) online continual learning closely resembles how animals learn; 2) loss of plasticity---the progressive decline in a learning network's ability to learn---is another crucial challenge facing continual learning; and 3) incremental introduction of randomly initialized hidden units was recently shown to help preserve plasticity, in this paper, we study the plasticity of several foundational growing and elastic networks in online continual learning. Our experiments in supervised learning settings show that adaptive growing networks, which incrementally incorporate new, randomly initialized units to the network while keeping all existing connections adaptive, can maintain high prediction accuracy without losing plasticity despite the continuous increase in the dead hidden unit proportion. Furthermore, we demonstrate that adaptive elastic networks, which in addition to progressively adding new hidden units also prune estimated dead hidden units at the beginning of each new task, can achieve excellent accuracy without loss of plasticity while simultaneously maintaining a near-constant, compact size. Our results suggest that growing and elastic networks, which exhibit the ability to adapt its structure to the relevant learning objectives, can be a promising class of algorithms also for preserving high plasticity in online continual learning.

A capability appears in a language model when the last parts of its circuit align in one stochastic attempt, and getting all but one right is worth nothing. We show this no-partial-credit joint alignment is the rate-limiting step of capability formation. Two fingerprints: in a shortcut-free apparatus a five-part circuit missing three waits as long as a three-part circuit missing three (1.19-1.37), so the wait counts missing parts, not size; and on Pythia across seven capabilities and three scales, ablating one part leaves a median 17% of the capability in 32 of 32 discriminating cells, where partial credit predicts 50-83% (p = 2e-10), while a random non-part head leaves 100%. One rare event whose barrier grows with missing parts yields a rate equation -- sites x attempts x drive x exp(-beta*K), minus destruction -- read three ways, each preregistered with frozen constants. Forward: a capability flat at baseline ignites at a step of our choosing once the mix passes a concentration floor (10/10 above, 0/12 below), and while still flat its arrival is datable from its precursor to 5% median error on six held-out models. Backward: the delay to learn a withheld capability grows with waiting until, past a critical step, it never ignites -- yet validation loss falls smoothly throughout, so standard monitors are blind to it. We locate the damage (heads commit to the base data) and isolate the cure: re-initializing only the query-key slices restores learnability (6/6) while the value slices do nothing (0/6). We prove the mechanism in a controlled gated-attention model: occupation forces a deadline whose consequences need no mixing assumption. Completed: SGD's noise fails the fluctuation-dissipation test, so we install one and anneal, melt and pin circuits on schedule. Scope: conjunction circuits in transformers to 1.4B.

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) value factorization methods can suffer from a loss of plasticity, gradually failing to adapt when transferring to new task instances. We trace this issue to stagnant neurons, units whose gradient updates become negligibly small relative to their weights, thereby hindering learning. While existing plasticity injection methods exist, they prove ineffective for such neurons. To address this, we propose Knowledge-retentive Neuron-level PlastIcity Focusing InjEction (KNIFE), a novel method that directly targets stagnant neurons. KNIFE replaces each stagnant neuron with a composite unit comprising three specialized components: a frozen knowledge neuron to preserve acquired knowledge, a re-initialized active neuron to restore learning capacity, and a compensation neuron to ensure the combined output matches the original, thus maintaining previous learned cooperation knowledge. Extensive experiments on SMACv2, predator-prey, and matrix games demonstrate that KNIFE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art plasticity injection methods.

The loss of plasticity - the ability of a network to learn new information after having already learned older information - is a fundamental challenge in creating artificial neural networks capable of continual learning. Although this phenomenon has been known for decades, it has mostly been studied in older, relatively small architectures and rarely in natural-language domains. To determine whether loss of plasticity remains a problem in the modern transformer-based LLM paradigm, we study plasticity loss in GPT-style Transformer models trained on a multilingual continual learning problem. Consistent with prior work, we find evidence of plasticity loss across models ranging from 5M to 314M non-embedding parameters, as measured by deterioration on a held-out Vietnamese probing task. We further find that the onset of plasticity loss follows a predictable scaling law, growing sublinearly with model size. These results suggest that larger models may delay the measurable effects of plasticity loss, but that increasing parameter count alone is likely to be insufficient to completely prevent it. We also find evidence of plasticity loss under stationary multilingual training, challenging the view that the phenomenon is exclusive to continual learning with abrupt task changes. Overall, our results suggest that even large Transformer language models trained on natural-language will eventually lose the ability to efficiently adapt to new data after sufficiently long training, in both continual and stationary settings.

Continual training of deep neural networks under non-stationarity often leads to a progressive loss of plasticity, eventually limiting further learning. We relate plasticity to the empirical Neural Tangent Kernel, and identify dynamical isometry (the condition that layer-wise Jacobian singular values remain close to one) as a key mechanism for preserving plasticity in continual learning. We revisit a class of networks that are almost-everywhere isometric while remaining universal Lipschitz function approximators, demonstrating that near-dynamical isometry is compatible with expressive nonlinear representations. For general architectures, we propose an efficient isometry-promoting regularization scheme and identify a novel mechanism by which it can reactivate dormant ReLU units. Building on this, we introduce AdamO, an Adam-style adaptive optimizer that decouples isometry regularization from gradient updates, analogous to AdamW. We further reinterpret prior plasticity-preserving approaches through the lens of dynamical isometry, showing that they target only a partial measure of isometry. Across supervised and reinforcement-learning continual-learning benchmarks designed to induce plasticity loss, our methods consistently match or outperform existing approaches.

Deep continual learning requires models to adapt to new tasks without retraining from scratch. However, neural networks can lose their ability to adapt to new tasks after training on previous ones, a phenomenon known as loss of plasticity. There have been several explanations and diagnostics proposed for plasticity loss. Motivated by the philosophy that "all models are wrong, but some are useful", we ask: can existing diagnostics predict a neural network's plasticity? In this work, we take a practical view to interpret plasticity as trainability, i.e., a neural network's future optimization gain on a target task. We first take a theoretical approach, showing, by constructing a few counterexamples, that some widely adopted diagnostics of plasticity, including representation rank and neural tangent kernel rank, can fail to predict the loss of trainability in both regression and classification settings. We instead propose a novel metric, called optimization readiness, which combines gradient strength and gradient reliability. We prove that optimization readiness lower bounds one-step optimization gain under standard smoothness assumptions, providing a theoretical guarantee for its predictive power. Empirically, we show that across commonly used deep continual learning settings, such as Slowly-Changing Regression and Permuted MNIST, optimization readiness more reliably ranks checkpoints by trainability than prior diagnostics, even with substantially fewer samples.

Continual learning research attempts to conserve two fundamental capabilities: new knowledge acquisition and the preservation of previously acquired knowledge. While knowledge in this case can be measured through performance over an implicit or explicit task space, model plasticity generally concerns adaptability as data distributions evolve. Though much of the literature has focused on catastrophic forgetting, deep networks can also suffer from loss of plasticity, becoming progressively harder to update under continued training. Recent research has identified multiple mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, including neuron saturation, parameter norm growth, and loss of useful curvature directions. Adaptive reset-based interventions, which selectively reinitialize low-utility network parameters, have emerged as practical solutions to restore trainability. Existing utility measures used to guide resets, such as activation magnitude, contribution utility, or gradient-based activity, rely on proxy signals that can become misaligned with the intervention they are meant to guide. In this paper, we introduce gradient times difference from reference (GXD), a theoretically motivated utility measure based on reference-based gradient attribution that estimates the first-order functional cost of replacing a unit. Our results show that utility measures aligned with the functional cost of the reset can make interventions more reliable in settings where existing reset criteria degrade. GXD reframes adaptive resetting as an intervention cost estimation problem, providing a practical path toward more robust continual learning systems.

In deep reinforcement learning (DRL), an agent is trained from a stream of experience. In a continual learning setting, such agents can suffer from plasticity loss: their ability to learn new skills from new experiences diminishes over training. Recently, Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) networks have been reported to enable scaling laws and facilitate the learning of diverse skills. However, in continual reinforcement learning settings, their performance can degenerate as learning proceeds, indicating a loss of plasticity. To address this, building on Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) theory, we formalize the plasticity loss in MoE policies as a loss of spectral plasticity. We then derive a tractable proxy for spectral plasticity, one expressible in terms of individual expert feature matrices. Leveraging this proxy, we introduce SPHERE, a practical Parseval penalty tailored for MoE-based policies that alleviates the loss of spectral plasticity. On MetaWorld and HumanoidBench, SPHERE improves average success under continual RL by 133% and 50% over an unregularized MoE baseline, while maintaining higher spectral plasticity throughout training.

In continual reinforcement learning (CRL), good performance requires never-ending learning, acting, and exploration in a big, partially observable world. Most CRL experiments have focused on loss of plasticity -- the inability to keep learning -- in one-off experiments where some unobservable non-stationarity is added to classic fully observable MDPs. Further, these experiments rarely consider the role of partial observability and the importance of CRL agents that use memory or recurrence. One potential reason for this focus on mitigating loss of plasticity without considering partial observability is that many partially-observable CRL environments are prohibitively expensive. In this paper, we introduce Forager, a light-weight partially-observable CRL environment with a constant memory footprint. We provide a set of experiments and sample tasks demonstrating that Forager is challenging for current CRL agents and yet also allows for in-depth study of those agents. We demonstrate that agents exhibit loss of plasticity, proposed mitigations can help, but that most useful is to leverage state construction. We conclude with a variant of Forager that generates an unending stream of new tasks to learn that clearly highlights the limitations of current CRL agents.