Neural Network Pruning
Overview
Neural network pruning studies how to remove parts of a model that contribute little to its predictions, reducing memory use, computation, energy, or latency. Methods range from magnitude-based removal to scores using gradients, Fisher information, curvature, activations, redundancy, or task-specific behavior; they may prune individual weights or structured units such as channels, attention heads, and layers. Pruning can happen during training or after training in one shot or iteratively, often with fine-tuning, distillation, or compensation to recover lost performance. A central challenge is that the best pruning decisions depend on the model, task, calibration data, and hardware, so lower parameter counts do not always translate into faster inference or preserve reliability and reasoning behavior.
Latest papers
292 papers37 papers in the last four weeks, up 3% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.
Spiking Layer-Adaptive Magnitude-based Pruning
Safety-Potential Pruning for Enhancing Safety Prompts Against VLM Jailbreaking Without Retraining
CA-HFP: Curvature-Aware Heterogeneous Federated Pruning with Model Reconstruction
GPrune-LLM: Generalization-Aware Structured Pruning for Large Language Models
Alternating Gradient Flow Utility: A Unified Metric for Structural Pruning and Dynamic Routing in Deep Networks
Pruning-induced phases in fully-connected neural networks: the eumentia, the dementia, and the amentia
HiAP: A Multi-Granular Stochastic Auto-Pruning Framework for Vision Transformers
Exploiting Adaptive Channel Pruning for Communication-Efficient Split Learning
Uncovering a Winning Lottery Ticket with Continuously Relaxed Bernoulli Gates
Adaptive MLP Pruning for Large Vision Transformers
High-Fidelity Pruning for Large Language Models
Deterministic Differentiable Structured Pruning for Large Language Models
HiPP-Prune: Hierarchical Preference-Conditioned Structured Pruning for Vision-Language Models
EvoESAP: Non-Uniform Expert Pruning for Sparse MoE
ROSE: Reordered SparseGPT for More Accurate One-Shot Large Language Models Pruning
Diff-ES: Stage-wise Structural Diffusion Pruning via Evolutionary Search
A Benchmark Study of Neural Network Compression Methods for Hyperspectral Image Classification
CA-AFP: Cluster-Aware Adaptive Federated Pruning
Energy-Efficient Information Representation in MNIST Classification Using Biologically Inspired Learning
Causal Mechanism Reduction: Mechanism Replacement for Neural Network Pruning and Abstraction
GRAIL: Post-hoc Compensation by Linear Reconstruction for Compressed Networks
Isotropic Activation Functions Enable Deindividuated Neurons and Adaptive Topologies
scaffold' neurons is maintained (neurogenesis). These symmetry-led diagonalisation and structural changes prioritise function-invariance: neurogenesis exactly preserves function, neurodegeneration is asymptotically function-preserving with the pruned singular-value threshold. Moreover, this construction enables asymptotic 50\% parameter sparsification of dense networks while preserving function analytically. Thus, the approach enables real-time restructuring of the architecture in response to task demands, task appending, removal or changes. Conceptually, this motivates broader applications of symmetry prescriptions at the small scale, even when no data-driven model-scale symmetry adherence is required. Following this, we build activations around symmetry, not from classical assumptions about individual neurons. Unlike typical elementwise forms, these alternatives feature explicit basis independence and do not individuate neurons. We leverage this to decompose and reinterpret neurons across sequential layers, simplifying structure and providing a natural route to adaptive topologies. Additional developments include a new tunable parameter, the intrinsic length'.