Small-Data Learning

Brain signal decoding is challenging because neural recordings are noisy and vary across individuals, while labeled data are often limited. Recent attention-based models on the symmetric positive definite (SPD) manifold have nevertheless achieved strong performance using covariance and connectivity representations, yet the contribution of learned token weighting remains unclear. We examine two representative architectures, MAtt (based on log-Euclidean geometry) and GBWAtt (based on generalized Bures--Wasserstein geometry), and find that their learned attention weights remain close to uniform after training. We relate this behavior to bounded similarity parameterizations that, under the original softmax scaling, limit attention-weight contrast. Moreover, replacing learned weights with uniform weights, throughout training and evaluation, has little effect on mean predictive performance while preserving each model's original aggregation geometry. Motivated by these findings, we introduce SPD-MetaFormer, an attention-free architecture built on uniformly weighted Fréchet aggregation under log-Euclidean geometry. Its backbone uses a geodesic residual to update a summary token and a shared spectral feedforward map to transform all tokens, followed by a learned weighted readout. Token states remain SPD-valued until tangent-space classification. Across three EEG benchmarks, SPD-MetaFormer achieves competitive results relative to published Euclidean and manifold baselines. Separate matched reproductions test learned versus uniform weighting within MAtt and GBWAtt. These results suggest that, in the short-sequence and limited-data regimes studied, carefully designed SPD architectures can provide a simpler and effective alternative to adaptive manifold attention.

The small-sample learning problem remains a fundamental challenge in machine learning because limited training data lead to unstable model estimation and generalization. Structural Risk Minimization (SRM) has long been regarded as a principled solution under the classical i.i.d. assumption. However, domain generalization (DG) violates this assumption, leaving the theoretical role of SRM in DG largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we establish the first theoretical guarantees for SRM in DG under mild assumptions. Specifically, based on the concept of stability, we derive learning consistency and generalization error bounds and prove that these bounds become tight when the hypotheses satisfy the stability condition. Building upon this, under a specific hypothesis space assumption, we establish stability, learning, and generalization bounds for SRM. We further discuss the applicability of these bounds to deep learning. This work establishes theoretical foundations for SRM under distribution shifts and sheds light on the design of robust DG algorithms in small-sample scenarios.

The small-sample-size (SSS) problem remains a fundamental challenge in machine learning when labeled data are scarce due to cost, accessibility, or ethical constraints. While numerous approaches have been proposed, existing methods often struggle to maintain stable and discriminative representations under high-dimensional and limited-data conditions. Kernelized Linear Principal Component Discriminant Analysis (KLPCDA), a recently proposed modular framework, integrates variance preservation, inter-class separability, and intra-class compactness within a unified kernel space. Although its formulation has shown promising initial results, a systematic understanding of how its components interact across diverse SSS scenarios remains lacking. In this paper, we present a systematic cross-domain study of KLPCDA to characterize the interaction mechanisms among its core objectives. We analyze the behavior of its seven variants across multiple real-world SSS tasks, including hyperspectral image classification, mechanical fault diagnosis, medical diagnosis, and face recognition. Through extensive experiments and ablation studies, we investigate how different objective combinations influence performance under varying conditions such as noise, class imbalance, and high dimensionality. Our analysis reveals consistent patterns in the interaction of the three core objectives variance, between-class, and within-class terms, providing a unified and interpretable understanding of their roles in stabilizing representations and enhancing discrimination in SSS settings. Based on these findings, we further derive practical guidelines for selecting appropriate KLPCDA variants under different data characteristics. Experimental results demonstrate that KLPCDA achieves strong and robust performance across domains, while maintaining low computational complexity suitable for resource-constrained environments.

In physically dominated machining processes, experimental datasets are small, expensive, and material-specific; in this regime, data curation, evaluation design, and the form of physics integration can matter as much as the learning algorithm. Using an abrasive waterjet milling dataset ($n{=}155$, Inconel,718), we make three methodological contributions. First, we separate physics-based data cleaning from statistical curation and treat the latter as competing modelling hypotheses rather than silent preprocessing. Second, we find that model rankings from a 15-point hold-out set can be unstable: the single-split winner drops from rank1 to rank7 under 10-fold cross-validation, while Gaussian Process (GP) variants occupy the top ranks. Third, we study a spectrum of physics integration levels and find that residual learning on a compact physics baseline is competitive for GP, yielding lower variance and an interpretable decomposition, but degrades tree-based models. Bayesian hyper parameter tuning improves parameter-sensitive baselines such as gradient boosting and SVR, yet harms multi-stage hybrid pipelines at this sample size. GP uncertainty intervals are approximately calibrated ($86\%$ empirical coverage at nominal $90\%$). The resulting picture is methodological: for small, expensive process datasets, our results suggest that, in this setting, reliable model comparison benefits from explicit curation hypotheses, robust evaluation, and careful choices about how physics enters the model.

Symbolic methods are generally not considered competitive with strong modern learners on realistic supervised tasks. We evaluate Algebraic Machine Learning (AML), a framework that learns through subdirect decomposition of algebraic structure rather than numerical optimization, against standard baselines on image and tabular classification across varying training-set sizes. We find that AML trained only on training data without using validation or cross-validation outperforms a family of cross-validated baseline methods including CNNs on small to medium image datasets (50--2000 training examples). On tabular datasets in the same size range, XGBoost is overall the best performing method, but AML is nonetheless comparable to methods incorporating task-specific biases such as LightGBM and random forests. AML achieves this competitive performance across two very different types of datasets using a generic algebraic inductive bias, rather than the modality-specific biases built into standard baselines like CNNs for images or XGBoost for tabular data, and requires no cross validation because it has no task-dependent hyperparameters to tune.

This work investigates the ``small-vs-large gap'', where repeating on fewer samples can lead to compute saving during training compared to using a larger dataset. This is observed across algorithmic tasks, architectures and optimizers and cannot be explained using prior theory. We argue that the speedup comes from appropriate layer-wise growth enabled by sampling biases, which is more pronounced when the dataset size is smaller. We provide both theoretical analysis and empirical evidence from various interventions. Our results suggest that using a smaller dataset with more repetitions is not just a fallback strategy under data scarcity, but can be proactively leveraged as a favorable inductive biases for optimization, particularly in reasoning tasks.

Aim/Introduction: Distance-encoding biomorphic-informational neural network (DEBI-NN) is a recently proposed architecture in which connection weights are defined by the distances between neurons positioned in a Euclidian space. This approach drastically reduces the number of trainable parameters compared to classical neural networks in which weights are directly trained. The training process for DEBI-NN is based on a genetic algorithm (GA), rather than gradient descent (GD) which remains the prevailing optimization algorithm in deep learning. We aim to design and implement a GD learner for DEBI-NN and assess its performance compared to GA. Materials and Methods: We designed a spatial backpropagation scheme tailored to DEBI-NN and carried out a comparison between GD and GA for classification tasks, using a synthetic non-linear "two-moons" dataset, two clinical medical imaging radiomic datasets and a fetal cardiotocography dataset with a sample sizes ranging from n=85 to n=2126. Each optimizer was tuned through targeted hyperparameter searches adapted to each dataset. Results: Across all experiments, GA consistently produced superior decision boundaries and classification performance (Synthetic: 100% vs 83%; DLBCL: 83% vs 78%; HECKTOR: 80% vs 67%; Fetal: 81% vs 66%), whereas GD exhibited instability and failed to fully capture the non-linear patterns inherent to DEBI-NN's spatial encoding. The entangled gradients resulting from neuron interdependencies limit the effectiveness of classical backpropagation. Conclusion: These findings highlight fundamental limitations of gradient-based methods in architectures with highly interdependent spatial parameters and confirm the suitability of evolutionary strategies for training DEBI-NN.

Deep-sea cold seep stage assessment has traditionally relied on costly, high-risk manned submersible operations and visual surveys of macrofauna. Although microbial communities provide a promising and more cost-effective alternative, reliable inference remains challenging because the available deep-sea dataset is extremely small ($n = 13$) relative to the microbial feature dimension ($p = 26$), making purely data-driven models highly prone to overfitting. To address this, we propose a knowledge-enhanced classification framework that incorporates an ecological knowledge graph as a structural prior. By fusing macro-microbe coupling and microbial co-occurrence patterns, the framework internalizes established ecological logic into a Graph-Regularized Multinomial Logistic Regression (GRMLR) model, effectively constraining the feature space through a manifold penalty to ensure biologically consistent classification. Importantly, the framework removes the need for macrofauna observations at inference time: macro-microbe associations are used only to guide training, whereas prediction relies solely on microbial abundance profiles. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms standard baselines, highlighting its potential as a robust and scalable framework for deep-sea ecological assessment.

Hollow-core fibers offer superior loss and latency characteristics compared to solid-core alternatives, yet the geometric complexity of nested antiresonance nodeless fibers (NANFs) makes traditional optimization computationally prohibitive. We propose a high-efficiency, two-stage machine learning framework designed to identify high-performance NANF designs using minimal training data. The model employs a neural network (NN) classifier to filter for single-mode designs (suppression ratio $\ge$ 50 dB), followed by a regressor that predicts confinement loss (CL). By training on the common logarithm of the loss, the regressor overcomes the challenges of high dynamic range. Using a sparse data set of only 1,819 designs, all with CL greater or equal to 1 dB/km, the model successfully identified optimized designs with a confirmed CL of 0.25 dB/km. {This demonstrates the NN has captured underlying physical behavior and is able to extrapolate to regions of lower CL. We show that small data sets are sufficient for stable, high-accuracy performance prediction, enabling the exploration of design spaces as large as $14e6$ cases at a negligible computational cost compared to finite element methods.

Cu NPs have a broad applicability, yet their synthesis is sensitive to subtle changes in reaction parameters. This sensitivity, combined with the time- and resource-intensive nature of experimental optimization, poses a major challenge in achieving reproducible and size-controlled synthesis. While ML shows promise in materials research, its application is often limited by scarcity of large high-quality experimental data sets. This study explores ML to predict the DLS-derived hydrodynamic diameter of Cu NPs using a small data set of 25 syntheses. Latin Hypercube Sampling is used to efficiently cover the parameter space while creating the experimental data set. Ensemble regression models successfully predict hydrodynamic diameters with good predictive performance given the limited dataset. Since quantitative regression requires a unique DLS-derived hydrodynamic diameter, the regression model is restricted to mono-modal DLS distributions, while a complementary classification model identifies synthesis conditions for which quantitative prediction is applicable. Using equivalent out-of-sample validation, the ML and DoE models showed comparable generalization. The final ensemble model achieved an R2=0.74 compared to 0.60 for the DoE model, while retaining the complete synthesis parameter space, making it better suited for synthesis guidance. Additionally, classification models using both random forests and LLMs are evaluated to distinguish between large and small particles. These classification models exhibited only modest predictive performance, indicating that this small dataset is insufficient to fully exploit the capabilities of complex LLMs. Overall, this study demonstrates that carefully curated small data sets, paired with robust classical ML, can effectively support the synthesis of Cu NPs and highlights that for lab-scale studies, complex models like LLMs may offer limited benefits.