Symbolic Reasoning

Recovering analytical solutions of physical fields from visual observations is a fundamental yet underexplored capability for AI-assisted scientific reasoning. We study visual-to-symbolic analytical solution inference (ViSA) for two-dimensional linear steady-state fields: given field visualizations (and first-order derivatives) plus minimal auxiliary metadata, the model must output a single executable SymPy expression with fully instantiated numeric constants. We introduce ViSA-R2 and align it with a self-verifying, solution-centric chain-of-thought pipeline that follows a physicist-like pathway: structural pattern recognition solution-family (ansatz) hypothesis parameter derivation consistency verification. We also release ViSA-Bench, a VLM-ready synthetic benchmark covering 30 linear steady-state scenarios with verifiable analytical/symbolic annotations, and evaluate predictions by numerical accuracy, expression-structure similarity, and character-level accuracy. Using an 8B open-weight Qwen3-VL backbone, ViSA-R2 outperforms strong open-source baselines and the evaluated closed-source frontier VLMs under a standardized protocol.

Auto-formalization (AF) translates natural-language reasoning problems into solver-executable programs, enabling symbolic solvers to perform sound logical deduction. In practice, however, AF pipelines are currently brittle: programs may fail to execute, or execute but encode incorrect semantics. While prior work largely mitigates syntactic failures via repairs based on solver feedback, reducing semantics failures remains a major bottleneck. We propose Draft-and-Prune (D&P), an inference-time framework that improves AF-based logical reasoning via diversity and verification. D&P first drafts multiple natural-language plans and conditions program generation on them. It further prunes executable but contradictory or ambiguous formalizations, and aggregates predictions from surviving paths via majority voting. Across four representative benchmarks (AR-LSAT, ProofWriter, PrOntoQA, LogicalDeduction), D&P substantially strengthens AF-based reasoning without extra supervision. On AR-LSAT, in the AF-only setting, D&P achieves 78.43% accuracy with GPT-4 and 78.00% accuracy with GPT-4o, significantly outperforming the strongest AF baselines MAD-LOGIC and CLOVER. D&P then attains near-ceiling performance on the other benchmarks, including 100% on PrOntoQA and LogicalDeduction.

This paper introduces PYTHEN, a novel Python-based framework for defeasible legal reasoning. PYTHEN is designed to model the inherently defeasible nature of legal argumentation, providing a flexible and intuitive syntax for representing legal rules, conditions, and exceptions. Inspired by PROLEG (PROlog-based LEGal reasoning support system) and guided by the philosophy of The Zen of Python, PYTHEN leverages Python's built-in any() and all() functions to offer enhanced flexibility by natively supporting both conjunctive (ALL) and disjunctive (ANY) conditions within a single rule, as well as a more expressive exception-handling mechanism. This paper details the architecture of PYTHEN, provides a comparative analysis with PROLEG, and discusses its potential applications in autoformalization and the development of next-generation legal AI systems. By bridging the gap between symbolic reasoning and the accessibility of Python, PYTHEN aims to democratize formal legal reasoning for young researchers, legal tech developers, and professionals without extensive logic programming expertise. We position PYTHEN as a practical bridge between the powerful symbolic reasoning capabilities of logic programming and the rich, ubiquitous ecosystem of Python, making formal legal reasoning accessible to a broader range of developers and legal professionals.

We introduce power term polynomial algebra, a representation language for Boolean formulae designed to bridge conjunctive normal form (CNF) and algebraic normal form (ANF). The language is motivated by the tiling mismatch between these representations: direct CNF<->ANF conversion may cause exponential blowup unless formulas are decomposed into smaller fragments, typically through auxiliary variables and side constraints. In contrast, our framework addresses this mismatch within the representation itself, compactly encoding structured families of monomials while representing CNF clauses directly, thereby avoiding auxiliary variables and constraints at the abstraction level. We formalize the language through power terms and power term polynomials, define their semantics, and show that they admit algebraic operations corresponding to Boolean polynomial addition and multiplication. We prove several key properties of the language: disjunctive clauses admit compact canonical representations; power terms support local shortening and expansion rewrite rules; and products of atomic terms can be systematically rewritten within the language. Together, these results yield a symbolic calculus that enables direct manipulation of formulas without expanding them into ordinary ANF. The resulting framework provides a new intermediate representation and rewriting calculus that bridges clause-based and algebraic reasoning and suggests new directions for structure-aware CNF<->ANF conversion and hybrid reasoning methods.

We present a new self-supervised machine learning approach for symbolic simplification of complex mathematical expressions. Training data is generated by scrambling simple expressions and recording the inverse operations, creating oracle trajectories that provide both goal states and explicit paths to reach them. A permutation-equivariant, transformer-based policy network is then trained on this data step-wise to predict the oracle action given the input expression. We demonstrate this approach on two problems in high-energy physics: dilogarithm reduction and spinor-helicity scattering amplitude simplification. In both cases, our trained policy network achieves near perfect solve rates across a wide range of difficulty levels, substantially outperforming prior approaches based on reinforcement learning and end-to-end regression. When combined with contrastive grouping and beam search, our model achieves a 100% full simplification rate on a representative selection of 5-point gluon tree-level amplitudes in Yang-Mills theory, including expressions with over 200 initial terms.

Multi-step theorem prediction is a central challenge in geometry problem solving. Existing neural-symbolic approaches rely heavily on supervised parametric models, which exhibit limited generalization to evolving theorem libraries. In this work, we explore training-free theorem prediction through the lens of in-context learning (ICL). We identify a critical scalability bottleneck, termed Structural Drift: as reasoning depth increases, the performance of vanilla ICL degrades sharply, often collapsing to near zero. We attribute this failure to the LLM's inability to recover latent topological dependencies, leading to unstructured exploration. To address this issue, we propose Theorem Precedence Graphs, which encode temporal dependencies from historical solution traces as directed graphs, and impose explicit topological constraints that effectively prune the search space during inference. Coupled with retrieval-augmented graph construction and a stepwise symbolic executor, our approach enables LLMs to act as structured planners without any gradient-based optimization. Experiments on the FormalGeo7k benchmark show that our method achieves 89.29% accuracy, substantially outperforming ICL baselines and matching state-of-the-art supervised models. These results indicate that explicit structural priors offer a promising direction for scaling LLM-based symbolic reasoning.

Large language models suffer from content effects in reasoning tasks, particularly in multi-lingual contexts. We introduce a novel method that reduces these biases through explicit structural abstraction that transforms syllogisms into canonical logical representations and applies deterministic parsing to determine validity. Evaluated on the SemEval-2026 Task 11 multilingual benchmark, our approach achieves top-5 rankings across all subtasks while substantially reducing content effects and offering a competitive alternative to complex fine-tuning or activation-level interventions.

Training on verifiable symbolic data is a promising way to expand the reasoning frontier of language models beyond what standard pre-training corpora provide. Yet existing procedural generators often rely on fixed puzzles or templates and do not deliver the distributional breadth needed at scale. We introduce Reasoning Core, a scalable suite that procedurally generates verifiable symbolic reasoning data across core formal domains: PDDL planning over randomized domains, first-order logic with equality, context-free grammar parsing and generation, causal reasoning over random Bayesian networks, and systems of equations. Each task is paired with an external solver for rigorous verification and admits continuous difficulty control for curriculum design. Examples can optionally include solver-derived reasoning traces, enabling supervised training from the earliest pre-training stages, and the same interface provides verifiable reward functions for reinforcement learning. Our experiments show that mixing Reasoning Core data into pre-training improves downstream reasoning while preserving, or slightly improving, language modeling quality. Zero-shot evaluations confirm these tasks challenge frontier models such as GPT-5. The code and data are publicly available under the MIT license.

The identification of repeating patterns in discrete grids is rudimentary within symbolic reasoning, algorithm synthesis and structural optimization across diverse computational domains. Although statistical approaches targeting noisy data can approximately recognize patterns, symbolic analysis utilizing deterministic extraction of periodic structures is underdeveloped. This paper aims to fill this gap by employing a hierarchical algorithm that discovers exact tessellations in finite planar grids, addressing the problem where multiple independent patterns may coexist within a hierarchical structure. The proposed method utilizes composite discovery (dual inspection and breadth-first pruning) for identifying rectangular regions with internal repetition, normalization to a minimal representative form, and prime extraction (selective duplication and hierarchical memoization) to account for irregular dimensions and to achieve efficient computation time. We evaluate scalability on grid sizes from 2x2 to 32x32, showing overlap detection on simple repeating tiles exhibits processing time under 1ms, while complex patterns which require exhaustive search and systematic exploration shows exponential growth. This algorithm provides deterministic behavior for exact, axis-aligned, rectangular tessellations, addressing a critical gap in symbolic grid analysis techniques, applicable to puzzle solving reasoning tasks and identification of exact repeating structures in discrete symbolic domains.

We introduce INDUCTION, a benchmark for finite structure concept synthesis in first order logic. Given small finite relational worlds with extensionally labeled target predicates, models must output a single first order logical formula that explains the target uniformly across worlds, with correctness verified via exact model checking. The benchmark includes three regimes, FullObs, CI (contrastive), and EC (existential completion), nd penalizes formula bloat. We find sharp difficulty gradients, persistent hard structural families, and observe that low bloat formulas generalize far better on held out worlds. Elite recent models show qualitatively different behaviors across tasks and performance metrics, hinting to their different strategies of concept generalization.

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong general-purpose reasoning capabilities, yet they frequently hallucinate when used as world models (WMs), where strict compliance with deterministic transition rules--particularly in corner cases--is essential. In contrast, Symbolic WMs provide logical consistency but lack semantic expressivity. To bridge this gap, we propose Neuro-Symbolic Synergy (NeSyS), a framework that integrates the probabilistic semantic priors of LLMs with executable symbolic rules to achieve both expressivity and robustness. NeSyS alternates training between the two models using trajectories inadequately explained by the other. Unlike rule-based prompting, the symbolic WM contributes candidate-level scores through log-linear reranking, without requiring the LLM to interpret rule text. Rule-guided sampling prioritizes transitions that are weakly covered by symbolic rules, using 35--60% of the training pairs while outperforming full-data supervised fine-tuning in five of six settings. Experiments on ScienceWorld, WebShop, and PlanCraft demonstrate consistent gains in WM prediction accuracy and data efficiency; one-step lookahead on open-ended WebShop also improves agent reward. Our models, rules, and code are available at https://github.com/tianyi-lab/NeSyS.

Based on a transformer based sequence-to-sequence architecture combined with a dynamic batching algorithm, this work introduces a machine learning framework for automatically simplifying complex expressions involving multiple elliptic Gamma functions, including the $q$-$θ$ function and the elliptic Gamma function. The model learns to apply algebraic identities, particularly the SL$(2,\mathbb{Z})$ and SL$(3,\mathbb{Z})$ modular transformations, to reduce heavily scrambled expressions to their canonical forms. Experimental results show that the model achieves over 99% accuracy on in-distribution tests and maintains robust performance (exceeding 90% accuracy) under significant extrapolation, such as with deeper scrambling depths. This demonstrates that the model has internalized the underlying algebraic rules of modular transformations rather than merely memorizing training patterns. Our work presents the first successful application of machine learning to perform symbolic simplification using modular identities, offering a new automated tool for computations with special functions in quantum field theory and the string theory.

Language models frequently produce plausible yet incorrect reasoning traces that are difficult to verify. We investigate fine-tuning models to use Prolog as an external symbolic reasoning tool, training Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) on a cleaned version of GSM8K (which we release as gsm8k-prolog-prover). We systematically vary prompt structure, reward composition (execution, syntax, semantics, structure), and inference protocol (single-try, multiple-try, and two agentic modes). Our reinforcement learning approach outperforms supervised fine-tuning on GSM8K, and the resulting 3B model achieves zero-shot performance on MMLU-STEM and MMLU-Pro competitive with 7B few-shot baselines. Most importantly, we identify an accuracy--auditability trade-off: configurations tuned for correctness alone learn to delegate reasoning to natural language and use Prolog only for the final computation, while configurations rewarded for symbolic structure produce fully auditable programs at a cost in accuracy. We interpret this trade-off as a form of reward hacking and discuss its implications for deploying neurosymbolic systems in safety-critical domains. The source code for our experiments is available under https://github.com/aisilab/Prolog-as-a-Tool