Overview

Tool-use evaluation studies whether language-model agents choose appropriate tools, provide valid arguments, interpret results, and complete tasks reliably. Benchmarks use executable APIs, simulators, and application environments, with deterministic state checks, trace analysis, and tests of long workflows, constraints, multimodal inputs, and tool failures. Researchers also measure efficiency, privacy, recovery, and whether tools actually improve performance using controls such as tool-free runs and deliberately misleading results. A central challenge is that final-answer scores and model-judge ratings can hide faulty processes, while harnesses, interfaces, and scoring rules can substantially change measured performance.

Latest papers

CardsList

97 papers17 papers in the last four weeks, up 21% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

  1. Open, Reliable, and Collective: A Community-Driven Framework for Tool-Using AI Agents

    Mar 31, 2026Hy Dang, Quang Dao, Meng JiangTool-Using AgentsLLM Agent Reliability

  2. CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints

    Mar 16, 2026Junjie Ye, Guoqiang Zhang, Wenjie Fu +4Tool-Use EvaluationAI Agent Benchmarks

  3. DREAM: Deep Research Evaluation with Agentic Metrics

    Feb 21, 2026Elad Ben Avraham, Changhao Li, Ron Dorfman +8AI Agent EvaluationDeep Research Agents

  4. When Users Are Happy but Agents Are Wrong: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Tool-Augmented Dialogue

    Oct 22, 2025Tanya Shourya, Yingfan Wang, Zhaoyi Joey Hou +3Tool-Use EvaluationAI Agent Benchmarks