User Attribute Inference Attacks

To support sustained interactions and personalized assistance, agents use long-term memory to retain and combine user information across sessions. Reusing such memories can lead an agent to state a sensitive relation while completing an ordinary task that does not require it. The relation to protect and the combination of clues that reveal it may remain hidden at memory write time, when later records and tasks are still unknown. In this paper, we introduce MemJoin, a privacy benchmark of 288 synthetic analysis cases in which the complete history entails a sensitive relation, but every individual session is insufficient. We evaluate six memory systems with the same answer-generating model, alongside full-history and no-history controls. Each system writes and updates memories in session order and later retrieves context for an ordinary task, while target annotations remain with the evaluator. We separately check which target attribute values appear in stored records and retrieved context, and whether the final answer states the complete, person-linked relation. In a separate paired test on a prespecified subset, removing shared identifiers and other connecting clues can change complete-relation output while all checked target attribute values remain visible. These findings show why checking attribute visibility alone is insufficient to evaluate what records from different sessions reveal together.

Anyone with a public footprint leaks facts that were never stated, and language models make the inference cheap. We present a framework for measuring and reducing this inference exposure that runs on the owner's own CPU with no language model at analysis time, instantiated on organisations and on individuals. It starts from a measurement result: scoring an inference system against the target's private truth conflates how well the system reads the record with how much the record leaks. On a 128-question instrument over sixteen synthetic firms, almost half of the questions are never answered correctly by any of six readers, four of them language models, and a majority-class guess accounts for most of every reader's score. We therefore separate reading accuracy from leakage rate and introduce an injection protocol that creates cells with known support. Our analyser combines rules, statistical solvers and a 106M-parameter encoder trained from scratch that marks verbatim evidence and never generates text; every answer carries a graded certificate whose recorded proof replays. Its certified answers are correct in 93% of resolved cases, against 49-73% for the language models' quote-backed answers, whose citations are produced alongside the answer rather than deriving it; with plain-prose articles in the record, 70% of its evidence-bearing answers rest on evidence that establishes them, against 18-56% for the models. A constrained defence that rewrites each fact's carrier as a true but coarser statement hides every single-carrier fact from four language-model adversaries at 40% lower edit cost than deletion. On sixteen synthetic people the guessing term is larger still, and a decoy planner with no language model halves the correct answers of the estimator it targets without transferring to a second.

Sensitive attributes such as age, income, and occupation can be inferred from user-generated content by aggregating indirect cues across many ordinary posts. LLM-based profilers can perform this aggregation automatically and with high accuracy, which makes large-scale personal attribute inference a major privacy threat. Existing LLM-based profilers, however, offer limited insight into which specific posts, concepts, and relationships made an inference possible, which is key to targeted privacy mitigation, i.e., redacting or rewriting only the few posts that actually leak an attribute, rather than perturbing entire histories. We introduce GraphProfiler, an auditable LLM-based profiler that represents each user's post history as a source-linked personal knowledge graph where nodes and edges trace back to the originating post and resolves attribute predictions to cited graph records and source texts. GraphProfiler reaches 86.7% attack success rate on the eight-attribute SynthPAI benchmark, within two points of strong text-only baselines, and 84.6% on PANDORA, while citing supporting evidence for over 98% of predictions. Our controlled ablation experiments provide evidence that the cited posts contribute to attack success, as removing them reduces the attack success rate substantially more than removing an equal number of random posts.

Targeted advertising systems can pair audiences selected by advertisers with ad units that expose visible user actions. When an interaction remains linked to the campaign that elicited it, the advertiser may receive an observation tied to a user rather than only an aggregate report. We model that channel as a noisy oracle for attribute inference. The model separates targeting predicates, exposure, interaction, and disclosure. These boundaries capture the gap between eligibility and delivery, and the gap between interaction and advertiser visibility. We build a reproducible benchmark using synthetic populations calibrated with public data, each with known sensitive labels. A generated campaign semantics layer provides topic variants and response priors. The simulator generates the ground truth, event traces, disclosed observations, and metrics. The evaluation compares Bayesian, supervised, positive and unlabeled, and adaptive attacks under common campaign and disclosure definitions. The final evaluation uses four topic variants, seven simulator seeds, and two interaction settings. Repeated campaigns with identity exposure produce measurable but bounded inference signal. At $160$ campaigns, Bayesian and supervised attacks reach about $0.64$ AUC in the main setting and about $0.65$ AUC in the higher interaction setting. Disclosure policy is the strongest control. Aggregate reporting removes the evaluated oracle input tied to users. Type filtering and randomized disclosure reduce the released signal. The result is a model, artifact, and defense evaluation method for privacy in interactive targeted advertising. The code is available at https://github.com/P-HOW/Interactive-Ad-Oracle.

EEG foundation-model releases are usually audited one endpoint at a time: raw-reconstruction, membership inference, identity linkage, or DP-SGD on the downstream head. We audit the same released embeddings under all four endpoints jointly, on BIOT, LaBraM, and EEGPT, and show that each single-endpoint audit clears releases that still leak spectral attributes. The decisive evidence is a cross-encoder transfer audit: a single ridge attribute decoder learned from one frozen encoder transfers, via a fitted linear bridge, to held-out-subject test splits of every other encoder, with subject-disjoint matched-control 95% CI lower bound at least 0.081 across all six BIOT/LaBraM/EEGPT directions. We prove a sufficient condition: two encoders sharing a nontrivial attribute-coordinate projector overlap beta admit a chained ridge bridge attacker with centered-gain lower bound sqrt(beta/(1+tau^2)) - eps_br - rho_0, and back-solve beta in [0.008, 0.198]. To turn the joint audit into a deployment-readable decision rule we introduce an audit-endpoint disagreement score (AEDS), prove sufficient conditions for its positivity, and bootstrap-calibrate it per cell; AEDS is positive in all eight matched-CI cells (BIOT/LaBraM/EEGPT on EEGMMI; LaBraM on Sleep-EDF, 54-channel LIMO, CHB-MIT pediatric scalp EEG) with p<0.001, while a head-level Carlini LiRA membership audit reaches AUC only 0.50-0.70. Standard defenses fail under audit: a Wiener-style noise-aware adaptive attacker, the LiRA audit, and DP-SGD at every utility-preserving epsilon in {4,8} leave the attribute channel essentially unchanged. The contribution is an audit framework that turns scattered single-endpoint defenses into a joint release decision, supported by a cross-encoder bridge theorem and adaptive-attacker, LiRA, and DP-SGD baselines; the audit licenses release-blocking, not raw-waveform exfiltration or held-out-subject identity recovery.

Synthetic data is increasingly promoted as a privacy-preserving substitute for releasing sensitive tabular records, yet its central adversarial threat (reconstruction, the recovery of an individual's hidden attribute values from a synthetic release and a handful of known quasi-identifiers) has been studied only in scattered, hard-to-compare settings. We systematize reconstruction (equivalently, attribute inference) attacks on de-identified and synthetic tabular data. We contribute a taxonomy that organizes attacks by the structure they exploit; a broad, controlled empirical evaluation, pitting fourteen attacks against thirteen synthetic data generation (SDG) methods across five benchmark datasets; and a set of new attacks that fill gaps in the taxonomy, one of which (CoBP-RA) is the strongest attack we measure. We also introduce a methodology for interpreting what attack success means: a memorization test that distinguishes reconstruction of the population distribution from memorization of training records, and a reduction that places reconstruction and membership inference on a single comparable scale. Our findings: the choice of SDG method governs risk far more than the choice of attack; differential privacy reduces reconstruction steadily up to epsilon approximately 10, above which reconstruction risk levels off for all six DP mechanisms we sweep, bounded by what each synthesizer can represent rather than by its noise; de-identification methods are the most exposed, with diffusion the only synthesizer close behind; and most reconstruction reflects distributional structure rather than memorization, concentrating individual risk on atypical records. Our attacks and infrastructure are externally validated by our first-place finish in the 2025 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Collaborative Research Cycle.

Smart meter data can reveal sensitive socio-demographic characteristics of households, raising privacy concerns. While this risk has been demonstrated at fixed granularities, the role of temporal resolution in shaping inference performance remains insufficiently explored. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing how load profiles with granularities from 15 minutes to 7 days affect the predictability of eight socio-demographic attributes in a dataset of 1,589 households over one year. We introduce an evaluation framework where classifiers are trained on year-round data but tested on arbitrary weeks, forcing generalization across seasonal and weekly variations. Our results show three main findings. First, while coarsening granularity reduces predictive accuracy, two plateaus emerge: performance is stable between 15 minutes and 1 hour, and again between 1 and 7 days. This reveals opportunities for data minimization without sacrificing utility. Second, interpretable handcrafted and tsfresh features remain competitive with CNN-based autoencoder embeddings, while XGBoost consistently outperforms alternative classifiers. Third, feature importance analysis highlights differences between static and dynamic attributes: dwelling size can be inferred even from coarse data, whereas swimming pool usage requires fine-grained temporal signals. Overall, our study provides new insights into the privacy-utility trade-off in smart metering, showing how temporal resolution, feature extraction, and classifier choice jointly influence socio-demographic inference.

Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are a powerful representation of linked data, offering flexibility, semantic richness, and support for knowledge enrichment and reasoning. They help data owners organize and exploit heterogeneous data to provide insightful services (e.g., recommendations), yet real-world KGs are often incomplete, hiding true facts or missing valuable insights. Knowledge graph embedding techniques are commonly used to infer valuable missing information. However, reasoning over KGs can inadvertently expose sensitive user information, even when such data is not explicitly stored. In this work, we investigate the privacy risks associated with KGE-based reasoning, focusing on attribute inference attacks where adversaries attempt to deduce sensitive user attributes from seemingly non-sensitive outputs. We propose and evaluate a framework that mitigates these privacy risks by applying post processing sanitization techniques to KGE outputs. Preliminary results demonstrate the effectiveness of these attacks on the outputs of KGE models, and explore the trade-off between recommendation quality and privacy protection when applying randomization based approaches, highlighting the need to experiment with more advanced techniques in future work to address this issue.

The pervasive integration of AI has enabled Offensive AI: the exploitation of AI for malicious ends across the cyber-kill chain. A critical manifestation is the user attribute inference attack, where AI infers sensitive Personally Identifiable Information (PII) from innocuous public data. We explore how music streaming ecosystems, where users routinely release public playlists, can be exploited for Offensive AI. To quantify this threat, we developed musicPIIrate. This novel tool leverages deep learning architectures that utilize both standalone data representations and the structural information embedded in a user's playlist collection. Our design explores set-based approaches (e.g., Deep Sets) and methodologies modeling relationships between playlists (e.g., Graph Neural Networks), which we also combine to leverage both perspectives. Our approach addresses feature extraction from unordered, variable-length set data, enabling accurate PII prediction. Empirical evaluation demonstrates that musicPIIrate achieves state-of-the-art inference accuracy. The tool successfully infers a wide array of attributes, including: Demographics (Age, Country, Gender), Habits (Alcohol, Smoke, Sport), and Personality Traits (OCEAN scores). musicPIIrate outperforms existing methods, beating baselines in 9 out of 15 attribute inference tasks. To counter this vulnerability, we propose JamShield, a lightweight defensive framework. JamShield strategically injects dummy playlists into an account to dilute the PII-carrying signal. Our analysis indicates that JamShield represents a promising defense, lowering inference F1-scores by an average of 10%. This work provides an initial Offensive-AI benchmark for playlist-based PII inference using architectures that leverage set- and graph-structured data and introduces a defense showing encouraging mitigation effects.

Deep learning models for time series imputation are now essential in fields such as healthcare, the Internet of Things (IoT), and finance. However, their deployment raises critical privacy concerns. Beyond the well-known issue of unintended memorization, which has been extensively studied in generative models, we demonstrate that time series models are vulnerable to inference attacks in a black-box setting. In this work, we introduce a two-stage attack framework comprising: (1) a novel membership inference attack based on a reference model that improves detection accuracy, even for models robust to overfitting-based attacks, and (2) the first attribute inference attack that predicts sensitive characteristics of the training data for timeseries imputation model. We evaluate these attacks on attention-based and autoencoder architectures in two scenarios: models that are trained from scratch, and fine-tuned models where the adversary has access to the initial weights. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed membership attack retrieves a significant portion of the training data with a tpr@top25% score significantly higher than a naive attack baseline. We show that our membership attack also provides a good insight of whether attribute inference will work (with a precision of 90% instead of 78% in the genral case).