Unraveling Groundwater Stress: A Model Generalizable Across Space and Time Reveals Co-Declining Water Tables and Recharge Across Bangladesh
Organizations: Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), BUET, Dhaka,& 1205, Bangladesh. · Institute of Water and Flood Management, BUET, Dhaka & 1000 , Bangladesh. · Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation (BADC), Dhaka, Bangladesh · Department of Public Health Engineering (DPHE), Dhaka, Bangladesh
Abstract
Is Bangladesh replenishing the groundwater it depends on? Answering this question remains difficult in Bangladesh and worldwide because sparse in-situ measurements limit observational capabilities, while existing machine-learning approaches struggle to generalize across time and space. To address this bottleneck, we develop a Teacher-Student framework in which a Teacher accurately learns from sparse annual in-situ minimum (R2 = 0.86) and maximum (R2 = 0.96) depth observations to generate dense spatial patterns, and a Student transfers these patterns from time-varying 25-km GLDAS groundwater storage to high-resolution (2-km) depth maps using location-specific features. The Student achieves R2 = 0.93 over 2003-2022 and generalizes across unseen years (Leave-One-Year-Out R2 = 0.93) and locations (Leave-One-District-Out R2 = 0.70), enabling reconstruction without contemporary in-situ measurements. The reconstruction reveals widespread water-table deepening and a national decline in groundwater recharge of 1.10 mm/yr (p < 0.001). Autocorrelation-corrected analysis identifies statistically significant recharge declines across 55.6% of Bangladesh, compared with significant increases across only 4.9%. This imbalance suggests that pumping-induced recharge enhancement, as proposed by the Bengal Water Machine hypothesis, remains localized rather than widespread across Bangladesh. Together, these findings reveal widespread weakening of groundwater replenishment and provide a scalable framework for monitoring groundwater dynamics in data-sparse aquifers globally.
Figures & tables
| Category / Experiment | Model / Framework | MSE | RMSE | MAE | MAPE (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Year-Specific Architecture Comparison (Ablation Study) | ||||||
| Max GWL | Random Forest | 0.3115 | 22.8765 | 4.7068 | 2.3979 | 34.20 |
| Neural Network | 0.1993 | 26.5521 | 5.0912 | 2.7973 | 41.13 | |
| XGBoost | 0.2172 | 25.9802 | 5.0143 | 2.6763 | 39.29 | |
| LightGBM | 0.2688 | 24.3531 | 4.8523 | 2.6511 | 38.78 | |
| Min GWL | Random Forest | 0.1082 | 33.1914 | 5.6804 | 3.0257 | 82.76 |
| Target Group | Metric | Random Forest | Neural Network | XGBoost | LightGBM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.9344 | 0.7125 | 0.8355 | 0.7487 | |
| MSE | 0.6466 | 2.9228 | 1.6891 | 2.6023 | |
| RMSE | 0.8041 | 1.7096 | 1.2997 | 1.6132 | |
| MAE | 0.3769 | 1.0707 | 0.7714 | 0.9432 | |
| Min GWL | 0.9191 | 0.6803 | 0.8233 | 0.7383 | |
| MSE | 0.6322 | 2.4991 | 1.3812 | 2.0452 |
| Features (data type) | Characteristics | Equation/ Tool name | Data Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slope (Numerical) | The steepness of the terrain, derived from the DEM. Slope influences surface runoff, soil erosion, and infiltration Gao et al. (2024) . | Where: • = Filtered DEM with x-gradient filter • = Filtered DEM with y-gradient filter • Pixel Size (DEM) = Pixel size of the DEM Ritter (2007) Note: Derived from slope of Spatial Analyst Tool in ArcGIS Pro platform | Derived from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) NASA Earthdata (2025) based digital elevation model (SRTM-DEM) of 30 m resolution |
| Drainage Density (Numerical) | The total length of streams per unit area of the watershed. Higher drainage density indicates better drainage and less water retention in the soil Anderson and Anderson (2010) . | Where: • : Total length of streams • : Area of a grid • : Drainage Density Horton (1932) Note: Derived from flow accumulation, stream order, fill, etc. of Spatial Analyst Tool in ArcGIS Pro platform | Derived from SRTM-DEM of 30 m resolution |
| Elevation (Numerical) | The height above sea level, derived from the DEM. Elevation influences climatic and hydrological conditions Kenward et al. (2000) . | Derived from SRTM-DEM of 30 m resolution | |
| Distance from Stream (Numerical) | The proximity of a location to the nearest stream, which affects the availability of water and the potential for flooding Suwanno et al. (2023) . | Where: • : Distance from stream for locations • : Represents features Note: Used Euclidean distance of Spatial Analyst Tool to calculate in ArcGIS Pro platform. | Derived from SRTM-DEM of 30 m resolution |
| Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) (Numerical) | A measure of topographic control on hydrological processes, calculated using slope and upstream contributing area. Higher values indicate wetter areas. | Where: • : Catchment area per unit • : Slope angle in degrees • : Topographic Wetness Index Note: Calculated from flow accumulation and slope using the Spatial Analyst Tool in ArcGIS Pro platform. | |
| Terrain Ruggedness Index (TRI) (Numerical) | Quantifies the terrain’s ruggedness by measuring elevation differences between adjacent grid cells. Rugged terrain affects runoff and groundwater recharge Grinevskii (2014) ; Verma and Mirajkar (2024) . | Where: • max : The highest cell value in the DEM • min : The lowest cell value in the DEM Note: Calculated using ArcGIS Pro platform. | Derived from SRTM-DEM of 30 m resolution |