Representation Learning for Equivariant Inference with Guarantees

A latent world model built from an equivariant encoder and predictor inherits a provable symmetry of its training loss: when the dynamics carries a group $G$ acting on latents by an orthogonal representation $ρ(g)$, the one-step prediction relMSE is exactly invariant across the whole group, so fitting a restricted slice of orientations mathematically determines it on the entire orbit. The symmetry survives a real Muon/AdamW+EMA+VICReg run -- composed residual $\sim 10^{-6}$ after training, under any optimiser (intrinsic Vector-Neuron/e3nn parametrisation) -- and one-step error is flat across the group (5-seed medians: equivariant $\times 1.00$ vs a higher-capacity non-equivariant baseline $\times 12.7$ in 2D, $\times 17.2$ in 3D), while that baseline fits the slice but breaks out-of-distribution. The flatness is not a synthetic artefact: on real-robot DROID end-effector trajectories the equivariant model stays flat across the orbit ($\times 1.000$, rotation residual $1.5\times 10^{-16}$) while a $4.5\times$-larger baseline degrades $\times 11$. One caution is load-bearing: flatness is necessary, not sufficient -- the theorem transports the in-distribution error level unchanged but does not lower it (3D relMSE $\approx 0.43$): across-group error is constant, not low. The same isometry lifts to a closed-loop corollary: under a matching equivariant planner the control error is invariant across the group -- float-floor-exact in 2D/SO(2), statistically flat in 3D/SE(3). Stress-tested against Sutton's Bitter Lesson (augmentation, scale, soft-equivariance), each closes at most the across-group task metric, never the float-floor exactness. This is the generalisation-side foundation of a certified-world-models programme (arXiv:2606.13092, 2606.24945, 2606.24946): flatness transports competence, and the trust bounds built on it are downstream products.

Rotational symmetry is one of the most important structural principles in machine learning on 3D data. In applications ranging from physics and materials science to 3D computer vision, predictions should not depend on an arbitrary choice of coordinate frame. Rotational equivariance captures this requirement mathematically by enforcing that a rotation of the input induces a corresponding transformation of the model output. This tutorial provides a comprehensive introduction to rotational equivariance, starting from the physical and geometric intuition behind coordinate independence and building up the necessary machinery from geometric deep learning, group theory, and representation theory. We introduce message passing on Euclidean graphs, group actions and representations, spherical harmonics, Wigner matrices, tensor products, and Clebsch-Gordan decomposition, and explain how these ingredients give rise to modern equivariant architectures. We then survey the principal strategies for incorporating rotational equivariance in deep learning, including group convolutions, internal tensorial representations, and canonicalization-based methods, and discuss their practical strengths and limitations. The tutorial aims to lower the barrier to the subject by connecting the underlying mathematics to practical model design, by unifying ideas that are often expressed in different formal languages, and by helping practitioners choose among competing approaches through a clear discussion of their trade-offs.

Probabilistic inference over spatially embedded variables requires beliefs that respect $SE(3)$ symmetry, yet existing equivariant networks produce only scalars and vectors -- not the rank-2 precision tensors needed for anisotropic uncertainty, and single-component messages collapse multi-modal energy landscapes to physically meaningless averages. We introduce Equivariant Neural Belief Propagation (ENBP), a factor-graph framework whose messages are equivariant Gaussian mixture models with sufficient statistics that transform exactly under $SE(3)$. Rank-2 precision matrices are synthesised via equivariant outer products, ingested through differentiable spectral decomposition, and kept tractable by a greedy KL-based mixture reduction that provably commutes with $SE(3)$. On GEOM-QM9 and GEOM-Drugs, ENBP achieves 98.9% conformational coverage at 0.090 $\mathring{A}$ error with sub-second latency -- over $100\times$ faster than diffusion baselines at higher accuracy. On multi-body robotic inference, vanilla loopy BP diverges at 15+ agents while ENBP converges with near-zero collision rates and machine-precision equivariance error (${\sim}10^{-7}$ vs.\ $10^{-1}$ for augmented baselines).