Abstract
This work highlights the duality between state estimation and model predictive control. A model predictive controller, observed control, is presented that uses this duality to efficiently compute control actions with linear prediction horizon length scalability. The proposed algorithms provide exceptional computational efficiency, adaptive time horizon lengths, and early optimization termination criteria. The use of Kalman smoothers as the backend optimization framework provides for a familiar implementation supported by strong theoretical guarantees. Additionally, a formulation is presented that separates linear model predictive control into purely reactive and anticipatory components, enabling any-time any-horizon observed control while ensuring controller stability for short time horizons. Finally, the method is extended to nonlinear systems and non-quadratic cost functions to obtain locally-optimal control of complex systems while maintaining linear prediction horizon scalability and adaptive-horizon capabilities.
Explore similar work
Apr 27, 2026math.OC
We study finite-horizon quadratic control of linear systems with bilinear observations, in which the control input affects not only the state dynamics but also the partial observations of the state. In this setting, the separation principle can fail because control inputs influence the future quality of state estimates. State estimation requires an input-dependent Kalman filter whose gain and error covariance evolve as functions of the control inputs. To address this challenge, we propose a belief-space model predictive control (
B-MPC) method that plans directly over both the estimated state and its error covariance. In particular,
B-MPC plans with a deterministic surrogate of the belief evolution defined by the input-dependent Kalman filter. Through numerical experiments in two synthetic settings, we show that
B-MPC can outperform both the separation-principle controller and its MPC variant in favorable regimes, and that these gains are accompanied by lower estimation covariance and more uncertainty-aware action choices.
Daniel Cao, Beixi Du, Andrew Lowitt +3
Jun 4, 2026eess.SY
Nonlinear Model Predictive Control requires solving a constrained nonlinear program (NLP) in real-time at every sampling instant, a computational bottleneck that limits deployment on resource-constrained hardware or at high sampling rates. We address this challenge for the broad class of input-affine nonlinear systems to show that the optimal control move can be approximated by a state-dependent quadratic program (QP) whose cost parameters depend on the current state and reference. We propose a single-network residual-corrector architecture: a state-dependent analytic baseline provides initial QP parameters, and the network learns only the corrections needed to match the full NLP solution; the QP is solved by a differentiable interior-point layer, guaranteeing constraint satisfaction for the first control action. The network is trained offline on data generated by an NLP solver using a hybrid loss that combines supervised imitation and KKT-residual penalties. We validate the approach on a three-link planar robotic arm with Cartesian end-effector tracking, demonstrating orders-of-magnitude speedup over the NLP solver while maintaining comparable tracking performance.
Francesco Pillitteri, Alberto Bemporad
Apr 29, 2026eess.SY
We study finite-horizon budget allocation as a closed-loop economic control problem and evaluate receding-horizon Model Predictive Control (MPC) relative to reactive budgeting policies. Budgets are allocated periodically under execution noise and operational constraints, while return efficiency may evolve over time. Using a controlled simulation framework motivated by digital marketing, we compare reactive pacing to MPC across environments with increasing degrees of non-stationarity. Our results show that non-stationarity alone does not justify predictive control. When return dynamics are stationary or evolve through unpredictable stochastic drift, MPC offers no systematic advantage over reactive baselines. By contrast, when return efficiency exhibits predictable structure over the planning horizon, that is captured through an underlying model, MPC consistently outperforms reactive budgeting by exploiting intertemporal trade-offs.
Nilavra Pathak, Smriti Shyamal, Prasant Mhasker +1