cs.CLSep 28, 2025

Pragmatic Inference for Improving Social Reasoning Generalization in Large Language Models

Authors: Guangliang Liu, Xi Chen, Bocheng Chen, Han Zi, Xitong Zhang, Yuda Chen, Kristen Johnson

Organizations: Indiana University Indianapolis · Nanyang Technological University · University of Mississippi · Qualcomm · 

Abstract

Achieving social reasoning, including moral reasoning, cultural awareness, and politeness, is critical for the socially reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs). A key bottleneck is limited generalization: social situations that convey similar social implicatures can be expressed through highly diverse linguistic forms, creating an enormous space of possible situations and posing a substantial computational challenge even for LLMs. From a linguistic perspective, this challenge arises because social reasoning operates at the pragmatic level, requiring a pragmatic inference process to infer social implicatures from a given situation and its underlying social context. Although moral values such as moral foundations are generally considered as the representations of the social context, how to construct the corresponding pragmatic inference steps remains underexplored. Taking moral reasoning as an instance of social reasoning, this paper develops a pragmatic inference approach that enables LLMs to infer moral implicatures by (1) specifying the inferential steps through which LLMs derive moral implicatures from language, and (2) explicitly modeling the metapragmatic links among these inferential steps to bridge the pragmatic gaps between them and make such inferences learnable for LLMs. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach substantially improves LLMs' generalization in moral reasoning, highlighting the potential of pragmatic inference for future social reasoning research.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables6 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Apr 2, 2026

Social Meaning in Large Language Models: Structure, Magnitude, and Pragmatic Prompting

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly exhibit human-like patterns of pragmatic and social reasoning. This paper addresses two related questions: do LLMs approximate human social meaning not only qualitatively but also quantitatively, and can prompting strategies informed by pragmatic theory improve this approximation? To address the first, we introduce two calibration-focused metrics distinguishing structural fidelity from magnitude calibration: the Effect Size Ratio (ESR) and the Calibration Deviation Score (CDS). To address the second, we derive prompting conditions from two pragmatic assumptions: that social meaning arises from reasoning over linguistic alternatives, and that listeners infer speaker knowledge states and communicative motives. Applied to a case study on numerical (im)precision across three frontier LLMs, we find that all models reliably reproduce the qualitative structure of human social inferences but differ substantially in magnitude calibration. Prompting models to reason about speaker knowledge and motives most consistently reduces magnitude deviation, while prompting for alternative-awareness tends to amplify exaggeration. Combining both components is the only intervention that improves all calibration-sensitive metrics across all models, though fine-grained magnitude calibration remains only partially resolved. LLMs thus capture inferential structure while variably distorting inferential strength, and pragmatic theory provides a useful but incomplete handle for improving that approximation.
May 20, 2026

Tracing the ongoing emergence of human-like reasoning in Large Language Models

Humans effortlessly go beyond literal meanings: If you mow the lawn, I will give you fifty dollars, is typically understood as implying that the speaker will pay only if the lawn is mowed, whereas If you are hungry, there is pizza in the oven implies that pizza is available regardless of the hearers hunger. Large Language Models - LLMs - show human-like performance on many tasks, yet it remains unclear whether they reason like humans. To address this, we conducted a population-matching experiment assessing how twentyfive LLMs compute conditional inferences across four languages, compared to an equal number of humans per language. We find that humans enrich logical reasoning through pragmatic inferences across languages. Model behavior is more variable. Some LLMs perfectly follow the truth-table of conditionals but they ignore pragmatic inferences, while others deviate from the truth-table, adhering to a single interpretation across the board, thus reflecting accurate rule-based processing but not human-like reasoning. Overall, LLMs are accurate semantic operators, but fail to capture the pragmatic enrichments characteristic of human reasoning. Crucially, LLM accuracy is neither predicted nor boosted by open vs. closed status, training orientation, or architecture type, suggesting that pragmatic reasoning is still an emerging ability in the cognitive toolkit of artificial systems.
May 29, 2025

SocialMaze: A Benchmark for Evaluating and Enhancing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models in Complex Social Environments

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in socially grounded applications, where success requires interpreting context, inferring others' mental states, and reasoning about unreliable information. Yet existing benchmarks rarely evaluate these demands jointly in complex, evolving settings. We introduce SocialMaze, a benchmark that organizes six tasks across social deduction games, daily-life interactions, and digital community platforms along three descriptive design axes: deep reasoning, dynamic interaction, and information uncertainty. These axes characterize intended sources of task difficulty rather than latent, factor-analytic dimensions of model capability. Automated checks and human validation support data quality. Evaluations of twelve proprietary and open-weight LLMs show substantial variation in the use of evolving interaction histories; stronger chain-of-thought reasoners perform better on tasks requiring deeper inference, while uncertainty consistently degrades performance. Reasoning workflows help weaker short-chain-of-thought backbones but saturate on stronger reasoners. Finally, targeted fine-tuning on curated reasoning traces substantially improves structured social-reasoning tasks, whereas transfer to language-aggregation tasks remains statistically inconclusive. The project homepage is available at https://xzx34.github.io/socialmaze/.