Abstract
Data-driven planar pushing methods have recently gained attention as they reduce manual engineering effort and improve generalization compared to analytical approaches. However, most prior work targets narrow capabilities (e.g., side switching, precision, or single-task training), limiting broader applicability. We present a model-based framework for non-prehensile tabletop pushing that uses a single learned model to address multiple tasks without retraining. Our approach employs a recurrent GRU-based architecture with additional non-linear layers to capture object-environment dynamics while ensuring stability. A tailored state-action representation enables the model to generalize across uncertain dynamics, variable push lengths, and diverse tasks. For control, we integrate the learned dynamics with a sampling-based Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) controller, which generates adaptive, task-oriented actions. This framework supports side switching, variable-length pushes, and objectives such as precise positioning, trajectory following, and obstacle avoidance. Training is performed in simulation with domain randomization to support sim-to-real transfer. We first evaluate the architecture through ablation studies, showing improved prediction accuracy and stable rollouts. We then validate the full system in simulation and real-world experiments using a Franka Panda robot with markerless tracking. Results demonstrate high success rates in precise positioning under strict thresholds and strong performance in trajectory tracking and obstacle avoidance. Moreover, multiple tasks are solved simply by changing the controller's objective function, without retraining. While our current focus is on a single object type, we extend the framework by training on wider push lengths and designing a balanced controller that reduces the number of steps for longer-horizon goals.
Explore similar work
May 29, 2026cs.RO
Non-prehensile robot manipulation is challenging due to discontinuous, long-horizon interactions between the robot and the objects it manipulates. Sampling-based model predictive control methods are effective with discontinuous contact but face challenges with finding promising trajectories in long-horizon planning. We propose a closed-loop object-informed (CLOI) method that splits the problem into object-level planning to find long-horizon object poses that lead the object to its goal, and robot-level planning to select robot actions that follow those poses. We use model predictive path integral (MPPI) control to solve the subproblems and couple their solutions through consensus on the object poses using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). The object plan is revised toward robot-realizable object trajectories, while the robot plan is aligned with the object poses the task requires. In planar pushing tasks with obstacles using an xArm6 manipulator, CLOI increases the success rate by 35% in simulation and 43% on hardware, compared to standard MPPI given the same computational budget.
Nikola Raicevic, Hyomuk Kim, Shahid Mulla +5
Sep 20, 2026cs.RO
Non-prehensile manipulation is practical for relocating large, heavy, or geometrically ungraspable objects. Yet, long-horizon pushing of arbitrarily-shaped 3D objects couples three problems: 1) where to push the object so as to approach the target pose, 2) whether each push is stable and reachable, 3) whether subsequent actions remain feasible. We present an object-centric pushing policy within a feedback-guided hierarchical framework. At the low level, a learning-based policy predicts contact actions from a pose- and scale-normalized point cloud, conditioned on a near single-step subgoal. A stability score is applied to evaluate the predicted contacts by a quasi-static sliding-versus-tipping analysis. At the high level, BIT
∗ first searches for an object path, and the next several subgoals are checked by contact prediction and robot motion planning for future feasibility. Failed motion plans, as feedback, change the local path costs and trigger re-planning. During execution, only the first feasible action is executed. In simulation, we evaluate 22 objects in six different scenes, upon which we also conduct comprehensive ablation studies. Results demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines with a clear margin and can reliably achieve long-horizon object pushing tasks under different situations. We also report quantitative real-robot experiments with a Franka arm and qualitative demonstrations with a mobile manipulator for large and heavy objects, with directly zero-shot sim-to-real transfer.
Zhiyi Yuan, Tianrun Hu, Anxing Xiao +3
Sep 2, 2026cs.RO
Monolithic world models predict the entire next state at every step, spending capacity re-predicting the static majority of a scene and injecting error into it. We ask whether explicitly modeling change (a per-object change gate plus a residual delta head that perturbs only the objects the gate flags) is a more effective and interpretable bias for physical prediction and control. On a MuJoCo tabletop pushing benchmark scaling from 3 to 8 objects, the sparse/residual model predicts next-state poses 2.5 to 4.6 times more accurately than a dense multilayer perceptron at 8.6 to 11.1 times fewer parameters, sustains change-detection F1 of 0.80 to 0.87 where the dense baseline is degenerate, transfers across object counts with zero retraining (99.4 percent F1 retention), and reaches about 90 percent of its full-data accuracy with a quarter of the data. In autoregressive rollout it compounds far less error, hugging the no-motion floor while the dense model drifts. Finally, inside a sampling-based planner, prediction-only models fail (though a true-simulator oracle solves the task with the identical planner, confirming the planner is sound), but once featurized and trained for the states a planner visits, the sparse model begins to plan (0.23 plus or minus 0.06 success over three seeds) while the dense monolith stays at zero at every seed. Modeling what changes, rather than re-predicting the whole world, is a simple, effective bias for object-centric physical AI; code, data generators, and all checkpoints will be released upon publication.
Param Thakkar, Parsika Paresh Shah, Manisha Sushant Gote