Predictive Feature Caching for Training-free Acceleration of Molecular Geometry Generation

Generating chemically valid 3D molecular conformations is critical for computational drug discovery. Classical diffusion-based models like GeoLDM perform well but require hundreds of steps, making large-scale in silico screening impractical. Recent efforts on few-step molecular generation have accelerated this process to 12-50 steps, but they often largely sacrifice sample stability. In this work, we present FlashMol, an ultra-fast molecule generative model producing high-quality molecular conformations in as few as 4 steps. To achieve this, we adapt distribution matching distillation (DMD) - a reverse KL-divergence minimization objective - to the molecular domain for effective distillation. Considering the local minimization behavior of DMD, we respace the molecule generation timesteps, providing the generator with much better initialization and enables effective distillation. Additionally, to mitigate the mode-seeking behavior of DMD and improve diversity, we further regularize it with a Jensen-Shannon divergence term, which incorporates the mean-seeking behavior of the forward KL divergence. Extensive experiments on QM9 and GEOM-DRUG datasets demonstrate that FlashMol matches and even surpasses the original 1000-step teacher, achieving up to 250$\times$ acceleration in sampling speed while maintaining high molecular quality.

The generation of accurate 3D molecular conformations is a pivotal challenge in computational chemistry and drug discovery. Recently, diffusion and flow matching models have achieved remarkable success. However, there is a critical misalignment between their mathematical formulation and the physical reality of molecules. Existing approaches predominantly treat molecules as unstructured point clouds in Cartesian space, overlooking the intrinsic hierarchical mechanics where bond lengths and bond angles are relatively stiff, whereas torsion angles constitute the dominant flexible degrees of freedom. This lack of manifold awareness forces models to relearn fundamental geometric constraints from scratch, often leading to physically implausible intermediate structures. To address this, we propose GO-Flow that aligns generative modeling with molecular geometry via manifold decomposition. Instead of forcing motion through Euclidean space, GO-Flow decomposes the generation process into three physically motivated subspaces: translation space with linear optimal transport, rotation space with geodesic flows on $SO(3)$, and conformation space with entropic optimal transport. This decomposition injects geometric inductive biases and makes the generative paths better aligned with molecular degrees of freedom. When combined with equivariant neural architectures, it encourages rotation-consistent generation and improves geometric validity. Extensive experiments on GEOM-Drugs and GEOM-QM9 demonstrate that GO-Flow achieves state-of-the-art generation quality. Notably, by learning straighter probability paths on the correct manifolds naturally, our method enables high-fidelity sampling with as few as 50 steps, effectively bridging the gap between structural precision and computational efficiency.

Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is fundamental to computational materials discovery. Generative models including CDVAE, DiffCSP, FlowMM, and CrystalFlow learn stable-crystal distributions directly, but diffusion and flow-matching inference requires tens to thousands of sequential network evaluations per candidate. We introduce uFlowCSP, a MeanFlow-based CSP model that learns the average, rather than instantaneous, probability-flow velocity. It generates a complete structure in one to five evaluations, delivering 5x-58x faster inference with equal or better performance. A chemistry- and symmetry-aware Transformer uses canonical atom ordering, global composition, and per-token chemistry embeddings. A coarse crystal-system token is used only during training; it provides additive gains, particularly improving space-group agreement despite being absent at inference, which remains formula-only. On MP-20 with 20 candidates per target, one step matches CrystalFlow (78.38% vs. 78.34%) with 100x fewer evaluations and about 10x lower wall-clock time. Five steps reach 83.64%, exceeding CrystalFlow (78.34% at 2,000 evaluations) and DiffCSP (77.93% at about 20,000), while using 20x fewer evaluations. uFlowCSP generates 10,000 structures in 0.39-1.31 minutes, versus 6.5 for CrystalFlow and 76.1 for DiffCSP. Under CSPBench's energy-ranked top-five structure-and-space-group criterion, five-step uFlowCSP reaches 72%/72%/65% structure, space-group, and consensus match rates. CrystalFlow reaches 78%/73%/68% at 100 steps but falls to 49%/32%/31% at five. Thus, uFlowCSP improves accuracy per network evaluation, not merely peak accuracy.