Disentangling Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Physics-Informed Neural Networks. Application to Insulation Material Degradation Prognostics

In modern industry, keeping complex systems reliable, safe, and efficient hinges on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM). Machine Learning (ML) has largely driven advancements in diagnostics and prognostics, yet purely data-driven models face inherent limitations, such as poor generalization, an inability to infer causal relationships, and a lack of interpretability. Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) helps mitigate these limitations by incorporating prior physical knowledge directly into the ML pipeline, thereby fostering growing interest in its application to PHM. This work investigates how PIML is being leveraged in the context of PHM through a systematic literature review of 212 studies. The review introduces a four-class classification scheme, consisting of observational bias, inductive bias, learning bias, and hybrid approaches, and further categorizes studies by PHM task. Across all four classes, the reviewed studies consistently demonstrate improved predictive performance over conventional baselines across a broad range of assets, although the literature is heavily skewed toward lithium-ion batteries and bearings, and dominated by problem-specific solutions. Overall, the review indicates that physics-informed approaches already provide tangible benefits, whereas claims of improvements concerning some of the aforementioned limitations lack sufficient supporting evidence. Future research should prioritize transferable design patterns, benchmarks comparing integration strategies, and uncertainty-aware models that are lightweight and robust enough for online deployment in real-world settings.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising framework for solving inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs), including the reconstruction of turbulent flow fields from sparse data. However, most existing PINN formulations are deterministic and do not provide reliable quantification of epistemic uncertainty, which is critical for ill-posed problems such as data-driven Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) modeling. In this work, we develop and systematically evaluate a set of probabilistic extensions of PINNs for uncertainty quantification in turbulence modeling. The proposed framework combines (i) Bayesian PINNs with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling and a tempered multi-component likelihood, (ii) Monte Carlo dropout, and (iii) repulsive deep ensembles that enforce diversity in function space. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of ensemble diversity and likelihood tempering in improving uncertainty calibration for PDE-constrained inverse problems. The methods are assessed on a hierarchy of test cases, including the Van der Pol oscillator and turbulent flow past a circular cylinder at Reynolds numbers Re=3,900 (direct numerical simulation data) and Re = 10,000 (experimental particle image velocimetry data). The results demonstrate that Bayesian PINNs provide the most consistent uncertainty estimates across all inferred quantities, while function-space repulsive ensembles offer a computationally efficient approximation with competitive accuracy for primary flow variables. These findings provide quantitative insight into the trade-offs between accuracy, computational cost, and uncertainty calibration in physics-informed learning, and offer practical guidance for uncertainty quantification in data-driven turbulence modeling.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have shown promise in addressing the ill-posed deconvolution problem in computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging for acute ischemic stroke assessment. However, existing PINN-based approaches remain deterministic and do not quantify uncertainty associated with violations of physics constraints, limiting reliability assessment. We propose Evidential Perfusion Physics-Informed Neural Networks (EPPINN), a framework that integrates evidential deep learning with physics-informed modeling to enable uncertainty-aware perfusion parameter estimation. EPPINN models arterial input, tissue concentration, and perfusion parameters using coordinate-based networks, and places a Normal--Inverse--Gamma distribution over the physics residual to characterize voxel-wise aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in physics consistency without requiring Bayesian sampling or ensemble inference. The framework further incorporates physiologically constrained parameterization and stabilization strategies to promote robust per-case optimization. We evaluate EPPINN on digital phantom data, the ISLES 2018 benchmark, and a clinical cohort. On the evaluated datasets, EPPINN achieves lower normalized mean absolute error than classical deconvolution and PINN baselines, particularly under sparse temporal sampling and low signal-to-noise conditions, while providing conservative uncertainty estimates with high empirical coverage. On clinical data, EPPINN attains the highest voxel-level and case-level infarct-core detection sensitivity. These results suggest that evidential physics-informed learning can improve both accuracy and reliability of CTP analysis for time-critical stroke assessment. Source code is available at https://github.com/jhlee0619/EPPINN.