Agentic AI Empowered Intent-Based Networking for 6G
Organizations: Department of Computer Science, Brunel University London, UK · Department of Computer Science, University of Reading, UK
Abstract
The transition towards sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks necessitates autonomous orchestration mechanisms capable of translating high-level operational intents into executable network configurations. Existing approaches to Intent-Based Networking (IBN) rely upon either rule-based systems that struggle with linguistic variation or end-to-end neural models that lack interpretability and fail to enforce operational constraints. This paper presents a hierarchical multi-agent framework where Large Language Model (LLM) based agents autonomously decompose natural language intents, consult domain-specific specialists, and synthesise technically feasible network slice configurations through iterative reasoning-acting (ReAct) cycles. The proposed architecture employs an orchestrator agent coordinating two specialist agents, namely Radio Access Network (RAN) and Core Network agents, via ReAct-style reasoning, grounded in structured network state representations. Experimental evaluation across diverse benchmark scenarios demonstrates that the proposed system outperforms monolithic agents, rule-based systems, and direct LLM prompting, with architectural principles applicable to Open RAN (O-RAN) deployments. The results also demonstrate that whilst contemporary LLMs possess substantial general telecommunications knowledge, structured prompt engineering encoding domain-specific decision thresholds and operational policies is essential for reliable network automation performance.
Figures & tables
| Sector ID | Active | Load | Spectrum Available (MHz) | Context | ||
| Users | (%) | mmWave | Mid | Low | ||
| stadium_central | 45,000 | 88 | 800 | 20 | 5 | High-density urban venue |
| city_plaza | 1,200 | 35 | 800 | 80 | 30 | Commercial district |
| industrial_park_a | 500 | 60 | 400 | 100 | 20 | Factory environment |
| suburban_residential | 3,000 | 45 | 0 | 60 | 40 | Fixed wireless access |
| rural_highway | 150 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 50 | Wide-area coverage |
| Latency to RAN Sector (ms) | |||||||
| Node ID | stadium_ | city_ | industrial_ | suburban_ | rural_ | Compute | Description |
| central | plaza | park_a | residential | highway | Load (%) | ||
| mec_stadium_1 | 2 | 12 | 15 | 25 | 45 | 65 | Stadium co-location (edge) |
| mec_industrial_1 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 25 | 40 | 30 | Factory proximity (edge) |
| metro_agg_hub | 8 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 50 | Metro aggregation (metro) |
| regional_dc_north | 35 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 50 | 40 | Regional data centre (core) |
| Scenario ID | Category | Semantic | Utility | Tokens | Time | Iterations |
| Accuracy | Score | (s) | ||||
| esports_stadium | URLLC | 1.0 | 0.91 | 13363 | 3.2 | 3 |
| industrial_automation | URLLC | 1.0 | 0.94 | 13573 | 4.0 | 3 |
| connected_ambulance_rural | URLLC | 1.0 | 0.54 | 13617 | 3.5 | 3 |
| ar_maintenance_industrial | URLLC | 0.5 | 0.94 | 12989 | 3.1 | 3 |
| stadium_4k_streaming | eMBB | 0.5 | 0.71 | 12587 | 3.3 | 3 |
| Iteration 1: Intent Parsing and RAN Consultation |
| Orchestrator classifies traffic as URLLC based on keywords “ultra-low latency” (<5ms explicit threshold) and “safety-critical operations”, identifying dual constraints of latency and reliability for industrial control application. |
| ACTION: CALL_AGENT | agent_name=ran_specialist | request=Can industrial_park_a support ultra-low latency and high reliability for automated robotic assembly with mmWave, mid-band, or low-band spectrum? What spectrum allocation is recommended? |
| Iteration 2: RAN Response and Core Consultation |
| RAN specialist evaluates spectrum options considering reliability requirements in industrial environment (potential interference, penetration challenges). Recommends mid-band despite mmWave availability, justifying: “Mid-band offers better balance between capacity and penetration, crucial for maintaining high reliability in industrial setting with potential interference.” Issues load monitoring warning (sector at 60% utilisation). |
| Orchestrator synthesises RAN output and consults Core specialist, formulating URLLC-aware query emphasising stringent latency requirement: |
| ACTION: CALL_AGENT | agent_name=core_specialist | request=Given mid-band allocation at industrial_park_a for automated robotic assembly line requiring ultra-low latency (<5ms), which UPF node can provide necessary latency and what considerations for high reliability and current 60% sector load? |
| System | Semantic | Utility | Tokens | Time |
| Configuration | Accuracy | Score | (s) | |
| Proposed Multi-Agent | 0.67 | 0.75 | 13281 | 3.8 |
| Monolithic Agent | 0.62 | 0.74 | 1894 | 0.8 |
| Rule-Based System | 0.46 | 0.75 | N/A | 0.1 |
| Direct LLM | 0.58 | 0.66 | 1157 | 0.6 |
| Configuration | Semantic | Utility | Sem | Util |
| Accuracy | Score | |||
| Full System | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Remove Prompts | 0.58 | 0.73 | -0.09 | -0.02 |
| Remove Specialists | 0.62 | 0.74 | -0.05 | -0.01 |
| Remove ReAct | 0.54 | 0.55 | -0.13 | -0.20 |
Intent-Based Networking
Intent-Based Networking translates high-level goals into validated network policies and uses feedback to manage services, resources, and performance.
See all 23 papers