MedBeads: An AI-Native Clinical Context Graph Built from Immutable Beads and Reconstructable Clinical Links
Authors: Takahito Nakajima
Organizations: Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba · Center for Cyber Medicine Research, University of Tsukuba
Abstract
Generative AI can encode substantial medical knowledge, but patient-specific answers remain constrained by the context supplied at inference time. Electronic health records and FHIR support documentation and interoperability, but they do not by themselves define the complete, current, and auditable context a model should receive. Similarity-based retrieval can find related text, but it neither guarantees collection of clinically connected records nor makes omissions explicit. We introduce MedBeads, an AI-facing clinical record substrate that assembles a declared closure of longitudinal patient information before generation. A Bead is an immutable clinical or knowledge object identified by SHA-256 over canonical content and stored as an append-only frame in a patient-scoped Pod. Structural parent edges form a patient-rooted Merkle DAG. Typed clinical links occupy a separate, reconstructable interpretation layer derived from signed, versioned knowledge rules; they can be recomputed when knowledge changes without rewriting clinical facts. Retrieval follows authorized structural and clinical edges, resolves amendments and retractions, and reports policy or token truncation. An open-source Go implementation uses append-only Pods and reconstructable SQLite projections. File-based conversion of 1,135 synthetic Synthea FHIR bundles produced approximately one million Beads and demonstrated deterministic clinical-link derivation and interpretation-layer reconstruction. These engineering results establish feasibility and reproducibility, not reduced hallucination or improved clinical outcomes. MedBeads reframes grounding as a data-structure problem by delivering a policy-bounded, provenance-bearing clinical subgraph rather than an opaque list of similar fragments.
Large language models (LLMs) show promise for clinical reasoning and decision support, but evaluation in structured, electronic health record-congruent settings remains limited. Existing benchmarks often rely on static datasets or unstructured inputs that do not reflect the interoperable data formats used in clinical systems. We introduce a reusable pipeline for generating terminology-grounded HL7 FHIR R4 bundles from unstructured text, enabling controllable evaluation of clinical decision support systems over structured inputs. The pipeline combines staged LLM generation with terminology-grounded validation and repair to eliminate hallucinated codes and enforce structural and semantic consistency. Applying this approach to MedCaseReasoning, we construct MedCase-Structured, a synthetic dataset of 1,732 FHIR bundles derived from clinician-authored diagnostic cases, producing complete, valid bundles for 97.1% of attempted cases. Evaluation on MedCase-Structured reveals consistently lower diagnostic accuracy for LLMs on structured FHIR inputs than with plain text, highlighting the importance of deployment-aligned benchmarking.
Patient contexts span hundreds of heterogeneous documents and thousands of structured data points, yet the document-level metadata that AI systems need for retrieval and triage is absent or incomplete. Standard retrieval-augmented generation fails on this data, mishandling temporal reasoning, cross-document dependencies, and missing metadata. We deploy ACIE (Agentic Clinical Information Extraction) at University Medicine Essen: an on-premise agentic RAG pipeline that reasons over complete patient contexts and grounds every answer in source passages for clinician verification. We quantify the metadata gap, trace the architectural decisions it shaped, and evaluate extraction alongside an independent retrospective lymphoma registry study, in which nuclear-medicine physicians verify every extracted value against its cited sources. Across 7,326 judgments, clinicians accepted 96.5% of extractions, with per-type acceptance ranging from 80% to 99%.
Osman Alperen Çinar-Koraş, Marie Bauer, Sameh Khattab +7
Longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs) capture years of patient history across notes, codes, labs, and procedures, and contain evidence needed to reason about likely clinical outcomes. However, comprehensive clinician review of these records is impractical, and LLM-based processing is costly and often unreliable, missing some relevant observations while hallucinating others. We therefore propose EviGen, a three-layer framework for verifiable clinical rationale generation that addresses these challenges. The first layer is a patient-conditioned retriever that uses learnable queries to find evidence predictive of, not just textually relevant to, a clinical outcome and ranks it by prediction attribution scores. The second layer is an LLM generator that consumes this ranked evidence as a scaffold to produce a clinical rationale grounded in the retrieved spans. The third layer is a process-supervised verifier that checks the generated rationale at the reasoning-step level, flagging unreliable claims. Across three medical prediction datasets, EviGen improves prediction performance and rationale faithfulness over full-context LLM and RAG baselines, and is preferred by clinical reviewers in a usability evaluation.