stat.MLFeb 11, 2026

Statistical Inference and Learning for Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)

Authors: Justin Whitehouse, Ayush Sawarni, Vasilis Syrgkanis

Organizations: Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University

Abstract

The SHAP (short for Shapley additive explanation) framework has become an essential tool for attributing importance to variables in predictive tasks. In model-agnostic settings, SHAP uses the concept of Shapley values from cooperative game theory to fairly allocate credit to the features in a vector XX based on their contribution to an outcome YY. While the explanations offered by SHAP are local by nature, learners often need global measures of feature importance in order to improve model explainability and perform feature selection. The most common approach for converting these local explanations into global ones is to compute either the mean absolute SHAP or mean squared SHAP. However, despite their ubiquity, there do not exist approaches for performing statistical inference on these quantities. In this paper, we take a semi-parametric approach for calibrating confidence in estimates of the ppth powers of Shapley additive explanations. We show that, by treating the SHAP curve as a nuisance function that must be estimated from data, one can reliably construct asymptotically normal estimates of the ppth powers of SHAP. When p≥2p \geq 2, we show a de-biased estimator that combines U-statistics with Neyman orthogonal scores for functionals of nested regressions is asymptotically normal. When 1≤p<21 \leq p < 2 (and the hence target parameter is not twice differentiable), we construct de-biased U-statistics for a smoothed alternative. In particular, we show how to carefully tune the temperature parameter of the smoothing function in order to obtain inference for the true, unsmoothed ppth power. We complement these results by presenting a Neyman orthogonal loss that can be used to learn the SHAP curve via empirical risk minimization and discussing excess risk guarantees for commonly used function classes.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables1 asset

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. RelShap: Relationally Consistent Shapley Explanations

    Aug 11, 2026Seungeun Lee, Joao Fonseca, Julia StoyanovichFeature AttributionShapley Value Attribution

  2. Beyond Shapley: Efficient Computation of Asymmetric Shapley Values

    Jun 23, 2026Ezequiel Companeetz, Santiago Cifuentes, Sergio AbriolaCooperative Game TheoryFeature Attribution

  3. A Polynomial-Time Axiomatic Alternative to SHAP for Feature Attribution

    Feb 28, 2026Kazuhiro Hiraki, Shinichi Ishihara, Takumi Kongo +1Feature AttributionShapley Value Attribution