cs.LGFeb 16, 2026

One Good Source is All You Need: Near-Optimal Regret for Bandits under Heterogeneous Noise

Authors: Amith Bhat, Haipeng Luo, Aadirupa Saha

Organizations: UIC · USC

Abstract

We study KK-armed Multiarmed Bandit (MAB) problem with MM heterogeneous data sources, each exhibiting unknown and distinct noise variances {σj2}j=1M\{σ_j^2\}_{j=1}^M. The learner's objective is standard MAB regret minimization, with the additional complexity of adaptively selecting which data source to query from at each round. We propose Source-Optimistic Adaptive Regret minimization (SOAR), a novel algorithm that quickly prunes high-variance sources using sharp variance-concentration bounds, followed by a `balanced min-max LCB-UCB approach' that seamlessly integrates the parallel tasks of identifying the best arm and the optimal (minimum-variance) data source. Our analysis shows SOAR achieves an instance-dependent regret bound of O~(σ∗2∑i=2Klog⁡TΔi+K∑j=1Mσj2)\tilde{O}\left({σ^*}^2\sum_{i=2}^K \frac{\log T}{Δ_i} + \sqrt{K \sum_{j=1}^M σ_j^2}\right), up to preprocessing costs depending only on problem parameters, where σ∗2:=min⁡jσj2{σ^*}^2 := \min_j σ_j^2 is the minimum source variance and ΔiΔ_i denotes the suboptimality gap of the ii-th arm. This result is both surprising as despite lacking prior knowledge of the minimum-variance source among MM alternatives, SOAR attains the optimal instance-dependent regret of standard single-source MAB with variance σ∗2{σ^*}^2, while incurring only an small (and unavoidable) additive cost of O~(K∑j=1Mσj2)\tilde O(\sqrt{K \sum_{j=1}^M σ_j^2}) towards the optimal (minimum variance) source identification. Our theoretical bounds represent a significant improvement over some proposed baselines, e.g. Uniform UCB or Explore-then-Commit UCB, which could potentially suffer regret scaling with σmax⁡2σ_{\max}^2 in place of σ∗2{σ^*}^2-a gap that can be arbitrarily large when σmax⁡≫σ∗σ_{\max} \gg σ^*. Experiments on multiple synthetic problem instances and the real-world MovieLens;25M dataset, demonstrating the superior performance of SOAR over the baselines.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables3 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Sep 29, 2026

Bandits with Multiple Optimal Arms: Minimax Regret and Non-Adaptivity

We study multi-armed bandits (MAB) with multiple optimal arms, motivated by the fact that many practical decision making problems admit multiple correct answers. For KK-armed bandits with AA optimal arms, we first provide a sharper analysis of previous sub-sampling algorithms (De Heide et al., 2021; Zhu and Nowak, 2020), establishing a O~(K−AKAT)\tilde{O}\Big(\frac{K-A}{\sqrt{KA}}\sqrt{T} \Big) minimax regret, where TT is the total number of interactions and O~(⋅)\tilde O(\cdot) drops all constant and logarithmic factors, improving the previous O~(KT/A)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{KT/A}) regret. We then provide a matching lower bound up to logarithmic factors, indicating that our established rate is nearly minimax-optimal. We further show that the knowledge of AA up to O~(1)\tilde{O}(1) factors is necessary to achieve near-optimal regret, as near-optimal algorithms for one number of optimal arms must incur substantially larger regret than optimal regret for a smaller number. Overall, our results provide a comprehensive minimax characterization of KK-armed bandits with AA over the entire range of 1≤A≤K−11 \leq A \leq K-1.
Sep 11, 2026

Toward Optimal Switching Regret for Multi-Armed Bandits with Oblivious Adversary

We study switching regret in adversarial multi-armed bandits, where the learner competes with an arm sequence that changes at most SS times. When SS is known, an optimal expected regret of O~((S+1)KT)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{(S+1)KT}) is obtainable [Auer et al., 2002]. However, when SS is unknown, Marinov and Zimmert [2021] show that this guarantee is impossible under an adaptive adversary. In this paper, we show that a single algorithm achieves O~((S+1)KT)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{(S+1)KT}) expected regret for every SS against an oblivious adversary, resolving an open problem of Auer et al. [2019b]. Our algorithm combines a fixed-share learner initialized with a small learning rate and dyadic-interval subroutines that search for local improvements using randomized learning rates and implicit exploration. Importantly, a non-uniform prior favors following the main learner, keeping the cost of maintaining many subroutines small. When the subroutines accumulate sufficient improvement over the main learner, its learning rate doubles, allowing adaptation to the unknown number of comparator switches SS.
May 1, 2026

Trading off rewards and errors in multi-armed bandits

In multi-armed bandits, the most-explored arms are the most informative, while reward maximization typically pulls only the best arm. We study the tradeoff between identifying arm means accurately and accumulating reward, and present an algorithm with regret guarantees that interpolates between the two objectives. We provide both upper and lower bounds and validate empirically.