One Good Source is All You Need: Near-Optimal Regret for Bandits under Heterogeneous Noise
Organizations: UIC · USC
Abstract
We study -armed Multiarmed Bandit (MAB) problem with heterogeneous data sources, each exhibiting unknown and distinct noise variances . The learner's objective is standard MAB regret minimization, with the additional complexity of adaptively selecting which data source to query from at each round. We propose Source-Optimistic Adaptive Regret minimization (SOAR), a novel algorithm that quickly prunes high-variance sources using sharp variance-concentration bounds, followed by a `balanced min-max LCB-UCB approach' that seamlessly integrates the parallel tasks of identifying the best arm and the optimal (minimum-variance) data source. Our analysis shows SOAR achieves an instance-dependent regret bound of , up to preprocessing costs depending only on problem parameters, where is the minimum source variance and denotes the suboptimality gap of the -th arm. This result is both surprising as despite lacking prior knowledge of the minimum-variance source among alternatives, SOAR attains the optimal instance-dependent regret of standard single-source MAB with variance , while incurring only an small (and unavoidable) additive cost of towards the optimal (minimum variance) source identification. Our theoretical bounds represent a significant improvement over some proposed baselines, e.g. Uniform UCB or Explore-then-Commit UCB, which could potentially suffer regret scaling with in place of -a gap that can be arbitrarily large when . Experiments on multiple synthetic problem instances and the real-world MovieLens;25M dataset, demonstrating the superior performance of SOAR over the baselines.
Figures & tables
| Algorithm | Setting (incl. assumptions) | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| MF-UCB ( Kandasamy et al., 2016 ) | Multi-fidelity -armed bandit. Assumes known biases and fidelities. | Ignores variance entirely. Evaluated only on synthetic data. |
| MF-MI-Greedy ( Song et al., 2019 ) | Multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization. Joint GP model over fidelities. Cost-sensitive mutual information criterion. | Relies on GP prior assumptions. Computationally expensive. |
| UCB-V / PAC-UCB ( Audibert et al., 2009 ) | Stochastic MAB with bounded rewards. UCB involves an empirical variance. PAC-UCB variant for known horizon. | Single-source. Evaluated only on synthetic data. |
| UGapE ( Gabillon et al., 2012 ) | Best-arm identification in stochastic MAB. Unified fixed-budget and fixed-confidence. Gap-based exploration with shared strategy. | Single-source. No empirical evaluation. |
| Thompson Sampling (TS) ( Agrawal and Goyal, 2013 ) | Stochastic MAB with bounded rewards. Bayesian algorithm (uses prior), but frequentist regret guarantees. | Single-source. No empirical evaluation. |
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.