Error Patterns in Historical OCR: A Comparative Analysis of TrOCR and a Vision-Language Model

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a key component in the digitization of historical archives. Recently, Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have emerged as strong alternatives to traditional OCR systems, achieving state-of-the-art performance on standard benchmarks. However, their suitability for archival transcription remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we benchmark traditional OCR systems and VLM-based approaches on the Berrutti dataset, a challenging collection of Uruguayan dictatorship-era documents derived from microfilm scans. While VLMs consistently outperform traditional methods in terms of Character Error Rate (CER) and Word Error Rate (WER), we show that these improvements hide a more complex picture. Through a detailed qualitative analysis, we uncover systematic failure modes that are invisible to standard metrics, including orthographic normalization, spurious content generation, and semantic substitutions that preserve fluency while altering meaning. Errors affecting named entities are particularly critical, as they can introduce substantial semantic distortions with minimal impact on CER and WER. These findings reveal a critical gap between quantitative OCR performance and transcription fidelity in real-world archival settings, and highlight the need for evaluation frameworks that go beyond character-level accuracy to capture the semantic reliability of generated transcriptions.

Recent work has shown that Vision-Language Models (VLMs) used for optical character recognition (OCR) can generate plausible but visually unsupported text, suggesting reliance on language priors. Comparing open-weight VLMs with traditional OCR baselines on low-resource Ancient Greek critical editions, we show that VLM errors often remain fluent even when wrong, producing plausible Greek substitutions where traditional engines produce local recognition noise. To analyze visual evidence during decoding, we introduce controlled image perturbations and token-level grounding measures based on conditional versus image-free decoding distributions. Under character-level perturbations, VLMs diverge sharply from the perturbed ground truth while traditional OCR remains comparatively faithful; however, token-level analysis shows that prior reliance is model-specific: in an OCR-specialist model, fluent lexical errors are produced with little reliance on the image, whereas general-purpose VLMs remain conditioned on the visual input even when wrong. Decode-time interventions fail to reliably restore grounding, while post-OCR language-model correction improves several systems only by repairing text after generation. Our results extend prior evidence of OCR language-prior reliance to low-resource historical documents and a broader set of models, showing that fluent output is not necessarily visually grounded and motivating interpretability-driven evaluation beyond aggregate accuracy.

End-to-end OCR for historical newspapers remains challenging, as models must handle long text sequences, degraded print quality, and complex layouts. While Transformer-based recognizers dominate current research, their quadratic complexity limits efficient paragraph-level transcription and large-scale deployment. We investigate linear-time State-Space Models (SSMs), specifically Mamba, as a scalable alternative to Transformer-based sequence modeling for OCR. We present to our knowledge, the first OCR architecture based on SSMs, combining a CNN visual encoder with bi-directional and autoregressive Mamba sequence modeling, and conduct a large-scale benchmark comparing SSMs with Transformer- and BiLSTM-based recognizers. Multiple decoding strategies (CTC, autoregressive, and non-autoregressive) are evaluated under identical training conditions alongside strong neural baselines (VAN, DAN, DANIEL) and widely used off-the-shelf OCR engines (PERO-OCR, Tesseract OCR, TrOCR, Gemini). Experiments on historical newspapers from the Bibliotheque nationale du Luxembourg, with newly released >99% verified gold-standard annotations, and cross-dataset tests on Fraktur and Antiqua lines, show that all neural models achieve low error rates (~2% CER), making computational efficiency the main differentiator. Mamba-based models maintain competitive accuracy while halving inference time and exhibiting superior memory scaling (1.26x vs 2.30x growth at 1000 chars), reaching 6.07% CER at the severely degraded paragraph level compared to 5.24% for DAN, while remaining 2.05x faster. We release code, trained models, and standardized evaluation protocols to enable reproducible research and guide practitioners in large-scale cultural heritage OCR available at https://github.com/MarcoPerson/ssm-ocr-benchmark.