A Scalable Curiosity-Driven Game-Theoretic Framework for Long-Tail Multi-Label Learning in Data Mining
Organizations: Sun Yat-sen University
Abstract
The long-tail distribution, where a few head labels dominate while rare tail labels abound, poses a persistent challenge for large-scale Multi-Label Classification (MLC) in real-world data mining applications. Existing resampling and reweighting strategies often disrupt inter-label dependencies or require brittle hyperparameter tuning, especially as the label space expands to tens of thousands of labels. To address this issue, we propose Curiosity-Driven Game-Theoretic Multi-Label Learning (CD-GTMLL), a scalable cooperative framework that recasts long-tail MLC as a multi-player game - each sub-predictor ("player") specializes in a partition of the label space, collaborating to maximize global accuracy while pursuing intrinsic curiosity rewards based on tail label rarity and inter-player disagreement. This mechanism adaptively injects learning signals into under-represented tail labels without manual balancing or tuning. We further provide a theoretical analysis showing that our CD-GTMLL converges to a tail-aware equilibrium and formally links the optimization dynamics to improvements in the Rare-F1 metric. Extensive experiments across 7 benchmarks, including extreme multi-label classification datasets with 30,000+ labels, demonstrate that CD-GTMLL consistently surpasses state-of-the-art methods, with gains up to +1.6% P@3 on Wiki10-31K. Ablation studies further confirm the contributions of both game-theoretic cooperation and curiosity-driven exploration to robust tail performance. By integrating game theory with curiosity mechanisms, CD-GTMLL not only enhances model efficiency in resource-constrained environments but also paves the way for more adaptive learning in imbalanced data scenarios across industries like e-commerce and healthcare.
Figures & tables
| Method | Pascal VOC | COCO | Yeast | Mediamill | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mAP | Rare-F1 | mAP | Rare-F1 | Micro-F1 | Rare-F1 | Macro-F1 | Rare-F1 | |
| CC ( Read et al., 2009 ) | ||||||||
| ML-GCN ( Chen et al., 2019 ) | ||||||||
| C-Tran ( Lanchantin et al., 2021 ) | ||||||||
| ML-Decoder ( Ridnik et al., 2023 ) | ||||||||
| LCIFS ( Fan et al., 2024 ) | ||||||||
| Dataset | Model Variant | mAP (%) | Micro-F1 (%) | Rare-F1 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascal VOC 2007 | Full CD-GTMLL | 92.6 0.2 | 91.0 0.3 | 79.2 0.3 |
| No-Curiosity ( ) | 92.3 0.3 | 90.5 0.3 | 75.2 0.4 | |
| Single-Predictor ( ) | 91.8 0.4 | 90.0 0.4 | 74.8 0.5 | |
| MS-COCO 2014 | Full CD-GTMLL | 68.4 0.3 | 61.5 0.3 | 49.3 0.4 |
| No-Curiosity ( ) | 66.0 0.4 | 60.0 0.4 | 46.1 0.5 | |
| Single-Predictor ( ) | 65.5 0.5 | 59.5 0.5 | 45.9 0.6 |
| Dataset | Label Type | Player 1 | Player 2 | Player 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascal VOC 2007 | Head (Frequent) | |||
| Tail (Rare) | ||||
| MS-COCO 2014 | Head (Frequent) | |||
| Tail (Rare) |
Appendix figures & tables2 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Disagreement Weight ( ) | mAP (%) | Rare-F1 (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 92.0 0.4 | 76.5 0.5 |
| 0.05 | 92.4 0.3 | 78.1 0.4 |
| 0.1 | 92.5 0.3 | 78.9 0.4 |
| 0.2 | 92.6 0.2 | 79.3 0.3 |
| 0.5 | 92.4 0.3 | 79.0 0.4 |
| 1.0 | 92.1 0.4 | 78.6 0.4 |
| Overlap Ratio ( ) | mAP (%) | Rare-F1 (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 91.5 0.4 | 75.8 0.6 |
| 0.1 | 92.3 0.3 | 78.5 0.4 |
| 0.2 | 92.6 0.2 | 79.3 0.3 |
| 0.3 | 92.5 0.3 | 79.1 0.3 |
| 0.4 | 92.4 0.3 | 78.9 0.4 |
| 0.5 | 92.4 0.4 | 78.8 0.4 |