Machine Learning Driven Prediction of the Behavior of Biohybrid Actuators
Organizations: Unconventional Computing Laboratory & School of Computing & Creative Technologies, College of Arts, Technology and Environment, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1QY, United Kingdom · School of Computing & Creative Technologies, College of Arts, Technology and Environment, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1QY, United Kingdom · Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain · Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy ·
Abstract
Skeletal muscle-based biohybrid actuators have proved to be a promising component in soft robotics, offering efficient movement. However, their intrinsic biological variability and nonlinearity pose significant challenges for controllability and predictability. To address these issues, this study investigates the application of supervised learning, a form of machine learning, to model and predict the behavior of biohybrid machines (BHMs), focusing on a muscle ring anchored on flexible polymer pillars. First, static prediction models (i.e., random forest and neural network regressors) are trained to estimate the maximum exerted force achieved from input variables such as muscle sample, electrical stimulation parameters, and baseline exerted force. Second, a dynamic modeling framework, based on Long Short-Term Memory networks, is developed to serve as a digital twin, replicating the time series of exerted forces observed in response to electrical stimulation. Both modeling approaches demonstrate high predictive accuracy. The best performance of the static models is characterized by R2 of 0.9425, whereas the dynamic model achieves R2 of 0.9956. The static models can enable optimization of muscle actuator performance for targeted applications and required force outcomes, while the dynamic model provides a foundation for developing robustly adaptive control strategies in future biohybrid robotic systems.
Figures & tables
| Stimulation Frequency | Amount of experiments |
| 50 | 69 |
| 30 | 48 |
| 20 | 30 |
| 35 | 12 |
| 70 | 1 |
| 25 | 1 |
| Stimulation Pulse Width | Amount of experiments |
| 15 | 53 |
| 5 | 41 |
| 20 | 17 |
| 10 | 15 |
| 8 | 13 |
| 40 | 10 |
| Aim | IDs of Actuators | Modulation | Freq [H] | PW [ms] | Waveform | Amplitude [mA] | Stim. Time | N. Measures |
| Tetanic contraction | S4 S5 S6 | 20 30 50 70 | MAX PW | Mono Triangular Asym. | 18 | 10 s | 31 | |
| Contraction Modulation | S1 S2 S3 | Linear Amplitude Modulation | 50 | 5 | Sym. Asym | 0-18 | 80 s | 5 |
| Contraction Modulation | S7 S8 S9 | Staircase Amplitude Modulation | 20 30 50 | MAX PW | Mono Sym Triangular Asym. | 3 - 18 | 6 steps 2 s | 39 |
| Contraction Modulation | S13 S14 S15 | Staircase PW Modulation | 20 30 50 | 2ms – MAX | Mono Sym. Triangular Asym. | 18 | 39 | |
| Contraction Modulation | S13 S14 | Linear PW Modulation | 30 35 50 | 0.1ms -MAX 2-MAX | Sym. | 18 | 10 s 20 s | 7 |
| Contraction Modulation | S10 S11 S12 | Linear Frequency Modulation | 10-20 10-30 10-50 20-35 35-50 | Max PW | Mono Sym Triangular Asym. | 18 | 20 s | 40 |
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Robotics
Robotics studies the design and control of machines that perceive, move, and act in physical environments.
See all 751 papers